Serum Abnormal Metabolites for Evaluating Therapeutic Response and Prognosis of Patients With Multiple Myeloma

被引:8
|
作者
Wei, Yujun [1 ]
Wang, Jinying [2 ]
Chen, Fei [1 ]
Li, Xin [1 ]
Zhang, Jiajia [1 ]
Shen, Man [1 ]
Tang, Ran [1 ]
Huang, Zhongxia [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chaoyang Hosp, Dept Hematol, Multiple Myeloma Med Ctr Beijing, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chaoyang Hosp, Multiple Myeloma Med Ctr Beijing, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
关键词
multiple myeloma; UPLC-MS; metabolome; biomarkers; treatment; disease progression; prognosis; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.808290
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
AimsTo evaluate abnormal metabolites related to treatment response and prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) patients through ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS). MethodsForty-six symptomatic MM patients were included in this study who had a prior high level of positive monoclonal proteins before receiving targeted therapy with bortezomib-based regimens. UPLC-MS along with traditional immunofixation was performed on MM diagnostic samples and effective serum samples, and UPLC-MS was used to target valuable metabolic markers related to M protein.MM patients were segregated into pre-therapy (pre-T) and post-therapy (post-T) groups according to the response after chemotherapy. A monoclonal protein could be detected at baseline in 33 newly diagnosed MM (NDMM), 13 refractory and relapsed MM (RRMM) patients and 20 healthy controls (HC) by immunofixation. ResultsBetween pre-T and post-T patients, the data showed that 32, 28 and 3 different metabolites were significantly correlated with M protein in IgG, IgA and light chain-type MM, respectively. These identified metabolites were significantly enriched in arginine and proline metabolism as well as glycerophospholipid metabolism pathways. Among them, PC (19:0/22:2) was displayed to increase significantly and consistently with M protein in each subtype of MM after treatment, which obviously indicated that it was related to the treatment response of MM. Further survival analysis of metabolic markers found that aspartic acid, LysoPE (16:0), SM (d18:1/17:0), PC (18:0/24:1), PC (16:0/16:0), TG (18:1/18:1/22:5) and LysoPE (18:2) reaching a certain cutoff value may be associated with shorter progression free survival (PFS). Finally, Cox multivariate regression analysis identified three factors were independent prognostic factors of MM. Moreover, there were significantly different in PC (19:0/22:2) and in aspartic acid between MM patients and healthy people. ConclusionThis work identified significant metabolic disorders in 46 pairs off pre- and post-therapy MM patients, specifically in arginine, proline and glycerophospholipid pathways. The abnormal metabolites have the potential to serve as new biomarkers for evaluating treatment response and prognosis, as well as early monitoring of disease activity. Therefore, these systematic studies on abnormal metabolites as biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment will provide the evidence for future precise treatment of MM.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Abnormal serum lysophospholipids in multiple myeloma patients
    Sasagawa, T
    Okita, M
    Murakami, J
    Kato, T
    Watanabe, A
    LIPIDS, 1999, 34 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [2] Prognosis and Therapeutic Response Transfer Learning Model for Multiple Myeloma
    Voegeli, Jerome
    Moreno, Dana
    Kryukov, Maxim
    Mathez, Gregory
    Petremand, Remy
    Pere, Arthur
    Ekstrom, Leeland
    Jaun, Andre
    BLOOD, 2021, 138 : 1883 - +
  • [3] Serum BAFF levels are related to angiogenesis and prognosis in patients with multiple myeloma
    Fragioudaki, M.
    Tsirakis, G.
    Pappa, C. A.
    Aristeidou, I.
    Tsioutis, C.
    Alegakis, A.
    Kyriakou, D. S.
    Stathopoulos, E. N.
    Alexandrakis, M. G.
    LEUKEMIA RESEARCH, 2012, 36 (08) : 1004 - 1008
  • [4] Immunophenotype Drift of Residual Plasma Cells Indicates Therapeutic Response and Prognosis in Multiple Myeloma
    Du, Chenxing
    Gang, An
    Xu, Yan
    Mao, Xuehan
    Yan, Yuting
    Liu, Jiahui
    Fan, Huishou
    Sui, Weiwei
    Deng, Shuhui
    Li Zengjun
    Zhao, Jiawei
    Yi, Shuhua
    Zou, Dehui
    Qiu, Lugui
    BLOOD, 2019, 134
  • [5] Serum Platelet Factor 4 Is a Promising Therapeutic Response and Prognostic Marker in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
    Bai, Ju
    He, Aili
    Zhang, Wanggang
    Yang, Yun
    Wang, Jianli
    Zhang, Pengyu
    Zhang, Yang
    Zhang, Lei
    Gu, Liufang
    Wang, Jin
    Shi, Rui
    Meng, Xin
    Tian, Wei
    Wang, Xiaman
    Lei, Xiaoru
    BLOOD, 2014, 124 (21)
  • [6] ABNORMAL IMMUNE RESPONSE TO KEYHOLE LIMPET HEMOCYANIN (KLH) IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA
    HARRIS, J
    ALEXANIAN, R
    HERSH, EM
    MIGLIORE, P
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1969, 70 (05) : 1084 - +
  • [7] Thalidomide metabolites in mice and patients with multiple myeloma
    Lu, J
    Palmer, BD
    Kestell, P
    Browett, P
    Baguley, BC
    Muller, G
    Ching, LM
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2003, 9 (05) : 1680 - 1688
  • [8] Molecular Heterogeneity of Multiple Myeloma: Pathogenesis, Prognosis, and Therapeutic Implications
    Avet-Loiseau, Herve
    Magrangeas, Florence
    Moreau, Philippe
    Attal, Michel
    Facon, Thierry
    Anderson, Kenneth
    Harousseau, Jean-Luc
    Munshi, Nikhil
    Minvielle, Stephane
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (14) : 1893 - 1897
  • [9] A new staging system to predict prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma in an era of novel therapeutic agents
    Iriuchishima, Hirono
    Saitoh, Takayuki
    Handa, Hiroshi
    Isoda, Atsushi
    Matsumoto, Morio
    Sawamura, Morio
    Iwasaki, Atsushi
    Ushie, Chiaki
    Hattori, Hikaru
    Sasaki, Yoshiko
    Mitsui, Takeki
    Yokohama, Akihiko
    Tsukamoto, Norifumi
    Murakami, Hirokazu
    Nojima, Yoshihisa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2015, 94 (02) : 145 - 151
  • [10] Multiple myeloma: Almost all patients are cytogenetically abnormal
    Zandecki, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1996, 94 (02) : 217 - 227