Sequential Bidding for Merging in Algorithmic Traffic

被引:0
|
作者
Markakis, Mihalis G. [1 ]
Talluri, Kalyan [2 ]
Tikhonenko, Dmitrii [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra, IESE Business Sch, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[2] Imperial Coll Business, Dept Analyt & Operat, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
algorithmic traffic; observable queues; sequential bidding; social welfare; PRIORITY AUCTIONS;
D O I
10.1287/msom.2022.1144
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Problem definition: We consider the problem of resolving ad hoc unpredictable congestion in environments where customers have private time valuations. We investigate the design of fair, efficient, budget-balanced, and implementable bidding mechanisms for observable queues. Academic/practical relevance: Our primary motivation comes from merging in algorithmic traffic, i.e., a driver wishing to merge in a relatively dense platoon of vehicles in a coordinated and efficient way, using intervehicle communication and micropayments, akin to an arriving customer trading for position in a single-server observable queue. Methodology: We analyze the performance of a mechanism where the queue joiner makes sequential take-it-or-leave-it bids from tail to head (T2H) of a platoon, with the condition that the vehicle can advance to the next position only if it wins the bid. This mechanism is designed so that it is implementable, balances the budget, and imposes no negative externalities. Results: We compared this mechanism with head to tail (H2T) bidding, which favors the merging driver but potentially causes uncompensated externalities. Assuming i.i.d. time valuations, we obtain the optimal bids, value functions, and expected social welfare in closed form in both mechanisms. Moreover, if the time valuation of the merging driver is not high, we show that the expected social welfare of T2H is close to a partial information social optimum and that the expected social welfare of H2T is lower than that of T2H as long as the platoon is not too short. Managerial implications: Our find-ings suggest that mechanisms based on sequential take-it-or-leave-it bids from T2H of an observable queue have good social welfare performance, even if the corresponding bids are not chosen optimally, as long as the time valuation of the arriving customer is not high. Nevertheless, the tension between individual incentives and social welfare seems hard to resolve, highlighting the role of platforms to enforce the cooperation of involved parties.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 181
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Algorithmic Randomness, Bayesian Convergence and Merging
    Huttegger, Simon
    Walsh, Sean
    Blando, Francesca Zaffora
    ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021, (335): : 211 - 211
  • [2] Algorithmic Randomness, Bayesian Convergence and Merging
    Huttegger, Simon
    Walsh, Sean
    Blando, Francesca Zaffora
    ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021, 335 : 211 - 211
  • [3] Algorithmic Bidding for Virtual Trading in Electricity Markets
    Baltaoglu, Sevi
    Tong, Lang
    Zhao, Qing
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (01) : 535 - 543
  • [4] A Theory of Costly Sequential Bidding
    Daniel, Kent D.
    Hirshleifer, David
    REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2018, 22 (05) : 1631 - 1665
  • [5] Optimal Sequential Merging Strategy Based on Adaptive Threshold for Ramp Traffic Involving Platoons
    Meng, Yun
    Liao, Shilong
    Wang, Ping
    Jin, Yinli
    Yang, Panpan
    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025, 26 (04) : 4661 - 4675
  • [6] Uninformed Bidding in Sequential Auctions
    Lorenzon, Emmanuel
    B E JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 23 (01): : 155 - 179
  • [7] PREDATORY BIDDING IN SEQUENTIAL AUCTIONS
    VONDERFEHR, NHM
    OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1994, 46 (03): : 345 - 356
  • [8] Predatory Bidding in Sequential Auctions
    Gunay, Hikmet
    Meng, Xin
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2007, 4
  • [9] OPTIMAL BIDDING IN SEQUENTIAL AUCTIONS
    OREN, SS
    ROTHKOPF, MH
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1975, 23 (06) : 1080 - 1090
  • [10] FORCING MERGING IN TRAFFIC
    JEWELL, WS
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1964, 12 (06) : 858 - &