Emotional intelligence and individual differences in affective processes underlying task-contingent conscientiousness

被引:20
作者
Minbashian, Amirali [1 ]
Beckmann, Nadin [2 ]
Wood, Robert E. [3 ]
机构
[1] UNSW Sydney, UNSW Business Sch, Sch Management, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ Durham, Sch Educ, Durham, England
[3] UNSW Sydney, Australian Grad Sch Management, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
affect; cognitive-affective personality system; emotional intelligence; personality dynamics; task-contingent conscientiousness; LATENT CLASS ANALYSIS; DEFENSIVE PESSIMISM; EMPIRICAL-EXAMINATION; STATISTICAL POWER; PERSONALITY; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; COMPLEXITY; MOTIVATION; SITUATIONS;
D O I
10.1002/job.2233
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Organisational researchers have recently begun to focus on the more dynamic aspects of personality in the workplace. The present study examines individual differences in the affective processes that underlie one such dynamic construct, task-contingent conscientiousness. Using experience sampling data collected over 3 weeks from 201 managers, we show (a) that individuals differ substantially from each other in the paths that connect task demand, positive and negative affect, and conscientious behaviour; (b) that these individual differences cohere to define person types or classes that represent meaningful differences in the extent to which task-contingent conscientiousness is mediated affectively; and (c) that emotional intelligence increases the likelihood of membership in classes that are characterised by affectively mediated effects. Theoretical implications of the findings are discussed with reference to the cognitive-affective personality system model, research on the consequences of affect in the workplace, and the literature on emotional intelligence. Practical applications are suggested for managers who wish to use personality assessment for developmental purposes, especially in relation to facilitating behavioural change.
引用
收藏
页码:1182 / 1196
页数:15
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge [J].
Ackerman, PL .
INTELLIGENCE, 1996, 22 (02) :227-257
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1984, STRESS COPING APPRAI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MPLUS WEB NOTES
[4]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[5]  
BARGH JA, 1994, NEBR SYM MOTIV, V41, P71
[6]   Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? [J].
Barrick, MR ;
Mount, MK ;
Judge, TA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2001, 9 (1-2) :9-30
[7]   Why does affect matter in organizations? [J].
Barsade, Sigal G. ;
Gibson, Donald E. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 21 (01) :36-59
[8]   An episodic process model of affective influences on performance [J].
Beal, DJ ;
Weiss, HM ;
Barros, E ;
MacDermid, SM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 90 (06) :1054-1068
[9]   It depends how you look at it: On the relationship between neuroticism and conscientiousness at the within- and the between-person levels of analysis [J].
Beckmann, Nadin ;
Wood, Robert E. ;
Minbashian, Amirali .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2010, 44 (05) :593-601
[10]   Can high optimism and high pessimism co-exist? Findings from arthritis patients coping with pain [J].
Benyamini, Y .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2005, 38 (06) :1463-1473