Quantitative analysis of survival of transplanted smooth muscle cells with real-time polymerase chain reaction

被引:61
|
作者
Yasuda, T
Weisel, RD
Kiani, C
Mickle, DAG
Maganti, M
Li, RK
机构
[1] Toronto Gen Hosp, Div Cardiovasc Surg, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
[2] Toronto Gen Hosp, Toronto Gen Res Inst, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Div Cardiac Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.06.027
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Cell transplantation improves heart function after myocardial infarction. This study investigated the survival of implanted cells in normal and infarcted myocardium. Methods: Male rat aortic smooth muscle cells were cultured. For the in vitro study, male smooth muscle cells mixed with female smooth muscle cells or male smooth muscle cells injected into a piece of female rat myocardium were used to evaluate the accuracy of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction to measure Y chromosomes. For the in vivo study, 2 million live or dead male smooth muscle cells were injected into normal or infarcted female myocardium. At 1 hour and 1 and 4 weeks after transplantation, hearts, lungs, and kidneys were harvested for measurement of Y chromosomes. Results: In vitro, the accuracy of polymerase chain reaction measurement was excellent in cultured cells (r(2) = 0.996) and the myocardium (r(2) = 0.786). In vivo, 1 hour after 2 X 10(6) cell implantation, live cell numbers decreased to 1.0 +/- 0.2 X 10(6) and 1.1 +/- 0.3 X 10(6), and dead cell numbers decreased to 0.9 +/- 0.2 X 10(6) and 0.8 +/- 0.2 X 10(6) in the normal and infarcted myocardium, respectively (P < .01 for all groups). Lungs and kidneys contained 8.5% and 1.5% of the implanted cells, but no cells were detected at 1 week. At 1 week, no dead smooth muscle cells were detected in the normal or infarcted myocardium. The numbers of live cells at 1 and 4 weeks were 0.48 +/- 0.06 X 10(6) and 0.27 +/- 0.07 X 10(6) in normal myocardium and 0.29 +/- 0.08 X 10(6) and 0.18 +/- 0.05 X 10(6) in infarcted myocardium. Conclusions: One hour after implantation, only 50% of smooth muscle cells remained in the implanted area. Some implanted cells deposited in other tissue. Implanted cell survival progressively decreased during the 4-week study.
引用
收藏
页码:904 / 911
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of haematopoietic chimaerism by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
    L W Harries
    C L Wickham
    J C Evans
    S A Rule
    M V Joyner
    S Ellard
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2005, 35 : 283 - 290
  • [2] Analysis of haematopoietic chimaerism by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
    Harries, LW
    Wickham, CL
    Evans, JC
    Rule, SA
    Joyner, MV
    Ellard, S
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 35 (03) : 283 - 290
  • [3] Bias and Imprecision in Analysis of Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Data
    Tellinghuisen, Joel
    Spiess, Andrej-Nikolai
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2015, 87 (17) : 8925 - 8931
  • [4] A New Method for Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Data Analysis
    Rao, Xiayu
    Lai, Dejian
    Huang, Xuelin
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (09) : 703 - 711
  • [5] Quantitative analysis of total mitochondrial DNA: Competitive polymerase chain reaction versus real-time polymerase chain reaction
    Bhat, HK
    Epelboym, I
    JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMICAL AND MOLECULAR TOXICOLOGY, 2004, 18 (04) : 180 - 186
  • [6] A kinetic model of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
    Mehra, S
    Hu, WS
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2005, 91 (07) : 848 - 860
  • [7] Comprehensive algorithm for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
    Zhao, S
    Fernald, RD
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (08) : 1047 - 1064
  • [8] Real-time polymerase chain reaction
    Oldach, D
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1999, 116 (03) : 763 - 765
  • [9] Real-time polymerase chain reaction
    Wilhelm, J
    Pingoud, A
    CHEMBIOCHEM, 2003, 4 (11) : 1120 - 1128
  • [10] Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction: A potential tool for genetic analysis in neuropathology
    Aldape, K
    Ginzinger, DG
    Godfrey, TE
    BRAIN PATHOLOGY, 2002, 12 (01) : 54 - 66