Propofol causes less postoperative pharyngeal morbidity than thiopental after the use of a laryngeal mask airway

被引:14
|
作者
Chia, Yuan-Yi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lee, Shih-Wei [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Kan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Inst Hlth Care Management, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2008年 / 106卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ane.0000297292.84620.2c
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The insertion of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) may result in postoperative sore throat. The choice of induction drug on airway morbidity after LMA insertion may be important. We performed this study to compare the incidence of postoperative pharyngeal morbidity after the insertion of a LMA in 340 patients administered either 2 mg/kg propofol (group P) or thiopental 5 mg/kg (group T) for induction of anesthesia. Patients were maintained at 1-2 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration sevoflurane in 50% oxygen/air. Spontaneous or assisted spontaneous ventilation was maintained. An investigator blinded to group allocation visited patients at 2, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. Adverse responses were noted (yes/no) at each time point including sore throat, sore mouth, sore jaw, hoarseness, dysphonia, and dysphagia. At 2 h postoperatively, the incidence of sore throat, dysphagia, and postoperative nausea and vomiting in group T was higher than in group P (24% vs 13% for sore throat, 15% vs 3% for dysphagia, 20% vs 11% for nausea, 14% vs 6% for vomiting, P < 0.05). The number-needed-to-treat to prevent sore throat and dysphagia was 10 and 8, respectively (95% confidence intervals, 5-43). We concluded that, when propofol, rather than thiopental, is used for the induction of anesthesia, it results in a lower incidence of early pharyngeal morbidity and postoperative nausea and vomiting after the insertion of a LMA.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 126
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laryngeal morbidity after use of the laryngeal mask airway
    Mencke, T.
    Noeldge-Schomburg, G.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 54 (02) : 127 - 128
  • [2] The PAXpress airway causes more pharyngeal irritation than the reusable laryngeal mask airway
    Goodman, EJ
    Ziegler, EJ
    Douglas, AM
    Mulgaokar, GD
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 100 (06): : 1862 - 1862
  • [3] Laryngeal mask airway insertion requires less propofol than endotracheal intubation in dogs
    Wiederstein, Iris
    Auer, Ulrike
    Moens, Yves
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 33 (04) : 201 - 206
  • [4] Laryngo-pharyngeal complaints after use of the laryngeal mask airway
    Figueredo, E
    Vivar-Diago, M
    Muñoz-Blanco, F
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1999, 46 (03): : 220 - 225
  • [5] Laryngo-pharyngeal complaints after use of the laryngeal mask airway
    Eduardo Figueredo
    Miguel Vivar-Diago
    Francisco Muñoz-Blanco
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 1999, 46 : 220 - 225
  • [7] Pharyngeal morbidity and the high intracuff pressure of classic laryngeal mask airway
    Thangaswamy, Chitra Rajeswari
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 107 (03): : 1083 - 1084
  • [8] Comparison of laryngeal mask airway supreme and laryngeal mask airway proseal for laryngopharyngeal trauma and postoperative morbidity in children
    Aydogmus, Meltem Turkay
    Eksioglu, Birsen
    Oba, Sibel
    Unsal, Oya
    Turk, Hacer Sebnem Yeltepe
    Sinikoglu, Saki Nadir
    Tug, Aslihan
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2013, 63 (06): : 445 - 449
  • [9] Pharyngeal morbidity and the high intracuff pressure of classic laryngeal mask airway - Response
    Lee, Shih-wei
    Chia, Yuan-yi
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 107 (03): : 1084 - 1084
  • [10] The use of thiopentone/propofol admixture for laryngeal mask airway insertion
    Yeo, KSJ
    Kua, SWJ
    Teoh, GS
    Onsiong, MKS
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2001, 29 (01) : 38 - 42