The effect of flavoured and non-flavoured tobacco on subjective experience, topography and toxicant exposure among waterpipe smokers

被引:16
|
作者
Ben Taleb, Ziyad [1 ]
Vargas, Mayra [2 ]
Kalan, Mohammad Ebrahimi [2 ]
Breland, Alison [3 ]
Eissenberg, Thomas [3 ,4 ]
Brown, David [5 ,6 ]
Maziak, Wasim [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Kinesiol, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Epidemiol, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Psychol, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Inst Drug Alc Studies, Richmond, VA USA
[5] Florida Int Univ, Div Family, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[6] Florida Int Univ, Coll Med Community Med, Miami, FL 33199 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PRODUCT USE; UNITED-STATES; NICOTINE; SMOKING; CIGARETTES; COMPONENTS; ADULTS; RISK; SNUS;
D O I
10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-054972
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Flavoured waterpipe (WP) tobacco is a major factor in the resurgence of WP smoking and a main attractant of WP use among youth. Yet, evidence of the effects of limiting flavour on WP smoker's experiences and exposures is limited. This study examined the impact of flavour manipulation on WP smokers' toxicant exposure and smoking experiences. Method A total of 144 WP smokers attended two, 45 min ad libitum smoking sessions (flavoured vs non-flavoured tobacco) in a crossover design study. Participants completed a battery of questions assessing subjective smoking experiences. Exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) and plasma nicotine concentrations were measured before and after the smoking sessions. Puff topography was recorded throughout the smoking sessions. Results Compared with the non-flavoured WP tobacco, participants reported enhanced subjective smoking measures of satisfaction and enjoyment following smoking flavoured WP tobacco (ps < 0.05). Although participants spent a longer time smoking flavoured tobacco, they took on average larger puffs while smoking the non-flavoured tobacco (ps < 0.05). Greater levels of eCO were recorded following the non-flavoured tobacco session (p<0.05) compared with flavoured tobacco. No significant differences were observed in plasma nicotine concentrations between the two tobacco conditions. WP harm perception was higher among participants after smoking non-flavoured WP tobacco compared with their preferred flavour (p<0.05). Conclusion Smoking the flavoured tobacco product was associated with enhanced subjective experiences compared with the non-flavoured, suggesting a potential role for flavour regulation in reducing WP use. Mixed results were observed for toxicants exposure in relation to smoking flavoured compared with non-flavoured products suggesting the need for a more comprehensive assessment of the effects of other tobacco constituents and additives on toxicant exposure in WP smokers.
引用
收藏
页码:S72 / S79
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Differences in price of flavoured and non-flavoured tobacco products sold in the USA, 2011-2016
    Agaku, Israel T.
    Odani, Satomi
    Armour, Brian
    Mahoney, Margaret
    Garrett, Bridgette E.
    Loomis, Brett R.
    Rogers, Todd
    Gammon, Doris G.
    King, Brian A.
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2020, 29 (05) : 537 - 547
  • [2] CO exposure, puff topography, and subjective effects in waterpipe tobacco smokers
    Maziak, Wasim
    Rastam, Samer
    Ibrahim, Iman
    Ward, Kenneth D.
    Shihadeh, Alan
    Eissenberg, Thomas
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (07) : 806 - 811
  • [3] EU TOBACCO RULES TO DETER YOUNG SMOKERS Impact of EU flavoured tobacco ban on waterpipe smoking
    Jawad, Mohammed
    Millett, Christopher
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348
  • [4] Differences in Puff Topography, Toxicant Exposure, and Subjective Response Between Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking Men and Women
    Soule, Eric K.
    Ramoa, Carolina
    Eissenberg, Thomas
    Cobb, Caroline O.
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 26 (05) : 440 - 447
  • [5] Comparison of a preferred versus non-preferred waterpipe tobacco flavour: subjective experience, smoking behaviour and toxicant exposure
    Leavens, Eleanor L.
    Driskill, Leslie M.
    Molina, Neil
    Eissenberg, Thomas
    Shihadeh, Alan
    Brett, Emma I.
    Floyd, Evan
    Wagener, Theodore L.
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2018, 27 (03) : 319 - 324
  • [6] Flavored Versus Nonflavored Waterpipe Tobacco: A Comparison of Toxicant Exposure, Puff Topography, Subjective Experiences, and Harm Perceptions
    Ben Taleb, Ziyad
    Breland, Alison
    Bahelah, Raed
    Kalan, Mohammad Ebrahimi
    Vargas-Rivera, Mayra
    Jaber, Rana
    Eissenberg, Thomas
    Maziak, Wasim
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (09) : 1213 - 1219
  • [7] Impact of flavors and humectants on waterpipe tobacco smoking topography, subjective effects, toxicant exposure and intentions for continued use
    Wagener, Theodore L.
    Leavens, Eleanor L. S.
    Mehta, Toral
    Hale, Jessica
    Shihadeh, Alan
    Eissenberg, Thomas
    Halquist, Matthew
    Brinkman, Marielle C.
    Johnson, Amanda L.
    Floyd, Evan L.
    Ding, Kai
    El Hage, Rachel
    Salman, Rola
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2021, 30 (04) : 366 - 372
  • [8] Markers of oxidative stress and toxicant exposure among young waterpipe smokers in the USA
    Rime Jebai
    Mohammad Ebrahimi Kalan
    Mayra Vargas-Rivera
    Olatokunbo Osibogun
    Wei Li
    Prem Gautam
    Mu-Rong Chao
    Chiung-Wen Hu
    Zoran Bursac
    Wasim Maziak
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 26677 - 26683
  • [9] Markers of oxidative stress and toxicant exposure among young waterpipe smokers in the USA
    Jebai, Rime
    Ebrahimi Kalan, Mohammad
    Vargas-Rivera, Mayra
    Osibogun, Olatokunbo
    Li, Wei
    Gautam, Prem
    Chao, Mu-Rong
    Hu, Chiung-Wen
    Bursac, Zoran
    Maziak, Wasim
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (21) : 26677 - 26683
  • [10] Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking and Cigarette Smoking: A Direct Comparison of Toxicant Exposure and Subjective Effects
    Cobb, Caroline O.
    Shihadeh, Alan
    Weaver, Michael F.
    Eissenberg, Thomas
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (02) : 78 - 87