共 50 条
Bedside ultrasonography for the detection of small bowel obstruction in the emergency department
被引:65
|作者:
Jang, Timothy B.
[1
,2
,3
]
Schindler, Danielle
[1
,2
]
Kaji, Amy H.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Olive View Med Ctr, Torrance, CA 90509 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Torrance, CA 90509 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Harbor UCLA Med Ctr, Torrance, CA 90509 USA
关键词:
SONOGRAPHY;
DIAGNOSIS;
D O I:
10.1136/emj.2010.095729
中图分类号:
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100602 ;
摘要:
Background Plain film radiography (x-ray) is often the initial study in patients with suspected small bowel obstruction (SBO) to expedite patient care. Objective To compare bedside ultrasonography (US) and x-ray for the detection of SBO. Methods This was a prospective study using a convenience sample of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with abdominal pain, vomiting, or other symptoms suggestive of a SBO. Patients were evaluated with US prior to x-ray and CT. US was performed by emergency physicians (EPs) who completed a 10 min training module and five prior US exams for SBO. The criterion standard for the diagnosis of SBO was the results of CT read by board-certified radiologists. Results In all, 76 patients were enrolled and evaluated with US for SBO. A total of 33 (43%) were diagnosed as having SBO. Dilated bowel on US had a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI 75 to 98%) and specificity of 84% (95% CI 69 to 93%) for SBO, compared to 27% (95% CI 14 to 46%) and 98% (95% CI 86 to 100%) for decreased bowel peristalsis on US. x-Ray had a sensitivity of 46.2% (95% CI 20.4 to 73.9%) and specificity of 66.7% (95% CI 48.9 to 80.9%) for SBO when diagnostic, but was non-diagnostic 36% of the time. Conclusion EP-performed US compares favourably to x-ray in the diagnosis of SBO.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / 678
页数:3
相关论文