The end of social innovation in urban development strategies? The case of antwerp and the neighbourhood development association 'bom'

被引:23
|
作者
Christiaens, Etienne
Moulaert, Frank
Bosmans, Bie
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, GURU, Sch Architecture Planning & Landscape, APL, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] CNRS, IFRESI, Lille, France
[3] Deputy Advisor Fed Urban Policy, Brussels, Belgium
[4] BOM, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
civil society; real-estate development; social innovation; urban regime;
D O I
10.1177/0969776407077741
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article examines the changes since the 1970s in the urban political regime in Antwerp. It focuses on the period 1990-2005; there was a shift from the traditional physical renewal policy (including social housing construction) of the 1980s, to a neighbourhood-based socially innovative urban development policy (1990s), and finally to a more mainstream real-estate led and market-driven urban policy starting in 2002. The article addresses both the material and discursive practices of main actors within the spheres of political and civil society. The analysis is built around the history of the neighbourhood development association BOM, once a leading urban policy innovator, but closed down in 2005 because it no longer fitted within the 'new' city-hall-controlled top-down urban policy concept.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 251
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条