Urinary bone resorption markers in monitoring treatment of symptomatic osteoporosis

被引:10
|
作者
Parviainen, MT [1 ]
Jääskeläinen, K
Kröger, H
Arnala, I
Alhava, E
机构
[1] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Chem, FIN-70210 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, FIN-70210 Kuopio, Finland
关键词
deoxypyridoline crosslinks; fracture; hormone therapy; N-telopeptide of type I collagen; osteoporosis; postmenopausal women;
D O I
10.1016/S0009-8981(98)00172-7
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
We have studied the clinical usefulness of urinary bone resorption markers in postmenopausal women with symptomatic osteoporosis. The study design is a randomised double-blind placebo controlled study, in which the subjects were daily treated for 24 months either with a hormone analogue (2.5 mg Livial(R), generic name Tibolone, Organon, Amsterdam, Holland) plus 800 mg calcium (n = 14, age 63+/-5 years, range 52-68 years), or with placebo plus 800 mg calcium (n = 19, age 66+/-7 years, range 50-75 years). The laboratory methods for urinary bone resorption markers were enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for urinary pyridoline (PYD) and deoxypyridoline crosslinks (DPD), and for cross-linked N-telopeptides of Type I Collagen (NTx), and an HPLC assay for urinary hydroxyproline (HOP). All the urine assay results were calculated per mmol creatinine. All the resorption markers decreased during the two-year study period in both groups. The Z scores (discriminating power, i.e. ability of the different tests to distinguish the hormone treated subjects from the placebo treated subjects) for HOP and PYD were rather low: 0.06-1.52 for HOP and 0.68-1.47 for PYD. The differences between the two treatment groups were statistically significant for DPD at 12 and 24 months of treatment (P = 0.0471 and P = 0.0466, respectively), the Z scores ranging 0.45-1.90. NTx showed the most prominent decrease from the beginning of the study especially in the hormone treatment group: the differences between the two treatment groups were statistically highly significant for NTx already at 6 months of treatment (P = 0.0015), and the Z scores remained high ranging 2.11-3.82 throughout the two-year study period. Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and femoral neck did not show statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups throughout the two-year study period. After 2 years there was, however, a significant increase in bone density both in the spine (+ 6.6%, P = 0.0002) and in the femoral neck (+ 3.4%, P = 0.0389) in the women with hormone treatment. Tn the control group a significant increase ( + 5.1%, P = 0.0012) in the spine, whereas a non-significant decrease (-1.5%, n.s.) in the femoral neck was observed. We suggest that measurement of urinary cross-linked peptides derived from Type I collagen (NTx and DPD) might be a useful biochemical method of observing the positive clinical effect (i.e. reduction in hone resorption) following hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal fracture patients. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 154
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of urinary bone markers for monitoring treatment of osteoporosis
    Worsfold, M
    Powell, DE
    Jones, TJW
    Davie, MWJ
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 50 (12) : 2263 - 2270
  • [2] Diagnosing and monitoring osteoporosis with bone resorption and formation markers
    Puri, V
    Shah, R
    Krishnan, M
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 15 (08) : 677 - 677
  • [3] Urinary bone markers can monitor treatment for osteoporosis
    Davie, MWJ
    Worsfold, M
    Powell, DE
    Davies, HL
    Williams, HC
    Jones, T
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2002, 17 (07) : 1341 - 1341
  • [4] Changes in bone resorption markers during osteoporosis treatment with oral bisphosphonates
    Eckman, D. A.
    Derikx, H. J. G. M.
    Bultink, I. E. M.
    Van Zanten, A. P.
    Lems, W. F.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2007, 22 : S191 - S191
  • [5] Osteoporosis treatment monitoring: Utility of bone turnover markers
    Bainbridge, PR
    Yap, TS
    Hannon, RA
    Price, A
    Catch, I
    Peel, NF
    Eastell, R
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 11 : S61 - S61
  • [6] Urinary Bone Turnover Markers as Target Indicators for Monitoring Bisphosphonate Drug Treatment in the Management of Osteoporosis
    Kwon, SoHyea
    Wang, Anne H.
    Sadowski, Cheryl A.
    Yuksel, Nese
    Doschak, Michael R.
    CURRENT DRUG TARGETS, 2018, 19 (05) : 451 - 459
  • [7] The Treatment and Monitoring of Osteoporosis using Bone Turnover Markers
    Patel, Nikhil
    Ganti, Latha
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2025, 17
  • [8] Comparison of four markers of bone resorption as diagnostic or monitoring tools in postmenopausal osteoporosis.
    Reginster, JY
    Taquet, AN
    Christiansen, C
    Henriksen, EG
    Collette, J
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1999, 42 (09): : S291 - S291
  • [9] BONE FORMATION AND RESORPTION MARKERS IN OSTEOPOROSIS PATIENTS WITH DIABETES
    Hwang, J. S.
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 35 : S203 - S203
  • [10] Monitoring therapy: Are bone resorption markers (BRM) during osteoporosis treatment with bisphosphonates within the lower half of the premenopausal range?
    Eekman, D. A.
    Derikx, H. J. G. M.
    Bultink, I. E. M.
    Van Zanten, A. P.
    Lems, W. F.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2007, 22 : S191 - S191