What do institutional investors bring to initial coin offerings (ICOs)?

被引:5
|
作者
Wang, Siyi [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Xiaoqiang [1 ,3 ]
Guan, Lei [4 ]
Zhang, Lianmin [1 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Res Inst Big Data, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Sch Sci & Engn, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong kong, Sch Data Sci, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Blockchain technology; Initial coin offerings (ICOs); Pre-ICO stage; Institutional investors; Network externality; BLOCKCHAIN; LOGISTICS; INFORMATION; ALLOCATION; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.tre.2022.102876
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Blockchain technology has attracted global attention for its ability to protect data security and traceability. It has driven the development of practical applications in various fields, namely management science, transport and logistics, and supply chain management. Initial coin offerings (ICOs), an emerging start-up fundraising method developed with blockchain technology, are now popular among start-ups that issue initial tokens as the sole exchange medium for their planned products. In addition to the public offering stage and market stage, the pre-ICO stage is an important phase for many ICO projects. In this paper, we establish an initial coin offering (ICO) model with network effects, a common phenomenon in ICOs, to study the effect of institutional investors' participation in the pre-ICO stage of offerings made by cash-strapped entrepreneurs. We find that introducing institutional investors significantly increases the equilibrium price of tokens during the public offering stage as well as the price fluctuation of tokens over time. Meanwhile, entrepreneurs will over-issue tokens when the intensity of network externality is relatively high. Interestingly, when institutional investors' required rate of return decreases, the change in the optimal issuance is not monotonic. Under some circumstances, the lower the rate of return required by institutional investors is, the less the optimal issuance to them is, even if the network externality is high. A higher issuance in the pre-ICO stage is thus a mixed blessing that can increase the price during public offerings and reduce the equilibrium price in other stages. The negative impact is even greater when network externality is high.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Initial Coin offerings: what rights do investors have?
    Zhao, Xiaoju
    Hou, Wenxuan
    An, Jiafu
    Liu, Xianda
    Zhang, Yun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2021, 27 (4-5): : 305 - 320
  • [2] Initial coin offerings (ICOs): Why do they succeed?
    Campino, Jose
    Brochado, Ana
    Rosa, Alvaro
    FINANCIAL INNOVATION, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [3] Initial coin offerings (ICOs): Why do they succeed?
    José Campino
    Ana Brochado
    Álvaro Rosa
    Financial Innovation, 8
  • [4] Institutional investors and post-ICO performance: an empirical analysis of investor returns in initial coin offerings (ICOs)
    Fisch, Christian
    Momtaz, Paul P.
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 64
  • [5] The Impact of Professional Investors on the Success of Startup Financing via Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs)
    Koscielecka, Anna
    18TH RSEP INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, FINANCE & BUSINESS CONFERENCE, 2020, : 1 - 9
  • [6] Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs): the importance of human capital
    Campino J.
    Brochado A.
    Rosa Á.
    Journal of Business Economics, 2021, 91 (8) : 1225 - 1262
  • [7] Initial coin offerings (ICOs) to finance new ventures
    Fisch, Christian
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2019, 34 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [8] Serial and large investors in initial coin offerings
    Dmitri Boreiko
    Dimche Risteski
    Small Business Economics, 2021, 57 : 1053 - 1071
  • [9] Serial and large investors in initial coin offerings
    Boreiko, Dmitri
    Risteski, Dimche
    SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2021, 57 (02) : 1053 - 1071
  • [10] Financing inventory through initial coin offerings (ICOs)
    Gan R.J.
    Tsoukalas G.
    Netessine S.
    Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management, 2020, 14 (1-2): : 60 - 76