Software Project Failure Process Definition

被引:7
|
作者
Nizam, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakif Univ, Dept Software Engn, TR-80523 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Software; Bridges; Schedules; Software engineering; Prediction methods; Licenses; Buildings; Bayesian belief network; grounded theory; qualitative process analysis; software process models; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; DE-ESCALATION; MANAGEMENT; SUCCESS; RISKS; MUM;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3162878
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Many researchers have attempted to identify the factors behind software project failures and their solutions from various perspectives. However, systematic and integrated process definitions of failure as process models for success are lacking. This study aims to build a process definition for software project failure as an anti-pattern by identifying the main phases and their relationships in terms of team behavior. We researched software engineering literature and case studies to gather information about critical incidents and repeating behaviors of teams in failed projects into a novel dataset. Grounded theory was employed to build a theoretical foundation for failure phase definitions from the collected data. The design structure matrix and Bayesian belief network were used for the quantitative assessment of the transitions between phases. The results revealed that common behavioral patterns occurred in approximately 89 percent of the case studies, supporting the decision to consider software project failure as a process. The proposed failure process definition has a simple structure that uses everyday concepts for phase names and reveals the critical behaviors leading a software project to failure Thus, it provides critical insights for software professionals, non-technical stakeholders, and managers to evaluate the progress of their projects and design strategies to avoid failure.
引用
收藏
页码:34428 / 34441
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Calculating completeness of software project scope definition
    ul Hassan, Isma
    Ahmad, Naveed
    Zuhaira, Behjat
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 94 : 208 - 233
  • [2] APPLYING REUSABILITY TO SOFTWARE PROCESS DEFINITION
    MOGILENSKY, J
    STIPE, D
    TRI-ADA 89 : INDUSTRY, ACADEMIA, GOVERNMENT: ADA TECHNOLOGY IN CONTEXT : APPLICATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEPLOYMENT, 1989, : 355 - 366
  • [3] Software project and process measurement
    Vector Consulting Services, Germany
    CrossTalk, 2009, 7-8 (22-27):
  • [4] A SOFTWARE FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCESS
    Banica, Logica
    Rosca, Doina
    Stefan, Cristian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY SERIES A-MATHEMATICS PHYSICS TECHNICAL SCIENCES INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2009, 10 (02): : 179 - 187
  • [5] Software project failure lessons learned
    Chisham, D
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1999, 42 (11) : 22 - 23
  • [6] A Process Definition for Domain Specific Software Development
    Lethrech, Mohammed
    Kenzi, Adil
    Elmagrouni, Issam
    Nassar, Mahmoud
    Kriouile, Abdelaziz
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2015 THIRD IEEE WORLD CONFERENCE ON COMPLEX SYSTEMS (WCCS), 2015,
  • [7] Software process definition & improvement: An industry report
    Jester, Michael
    Krasner, Herb
    Perry, Dewayne E.
    32ND EUROMICRO CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND ADVANCED APPLICATIONS (SEAA) - PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 206 - +
  • [8] Definition of Software Metrics for Software Project Development by Using Fuzzy Sets and Logic
    Mirseidova, Sholpan
    Atymtayeva, Lyazzat
    6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, AND THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCED INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2012, : 272 - 276
  • [9] A definition of software process quality based on statistical process control
    Li, Z
    Gong, B
    He, XG
    Yu, ZY
    Proceedings of the 11th Joint International Computer Conference, 2005, : 814 - 817
  • [10] A Survey of Software Project Managers on Software Process Change
    Guo, Yuepu
    Seaman, Carolyn
    ESEM'08: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2008 ACM-IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND MEASUREMENT, 2008, : 263 - 269