Anticipated group versus individual examinations: A classroom comparison

被引:14
|
作者
Woody, William Douglas [1 ]
Woody, Lisa K. [1 ]
Bromley, Susan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ No Colorado, Dept Psychol, Greeley, CO 80639 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00986280701818540
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Instructors across disciplines continue to seek methods to improve students' retention of class material. One potential method for increasing retention is the use of collaborative, or group, testing. We tested the hypothesis that group testing would lead to greater retention than individual testing. Two instructors, teaching 2 sections of their respective courses, alternated testing formats across the 2 courses. Participants were 147 students from 4 separate undergraduate psychology courses (2 per instructor). Participants taking the group test initially scored higher than those taking the individual test. However, after 3 weeks, with retesting on a subset of questions, there was no significant difference in retention between group versus individual test takers. These findings call into question the value of collaborative testing.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 17
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GROUP AND INDIVIDUAL JUDGMENTS FOR ANTICIPATED EVENTS
    Klugman, Samuel F.
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1947, 26 (01): : 21 - 28
  • [2] A COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF DIABETIC EDUCATION IN THE CLASSROOM SETTING VERSUS INDIVIDUAL INSTRUCTION
    CARPENTIER, W
    BRATCHER, T
    HEJL, J
    LATIMER, C
    PIZIAK, V
    DIABETES, 1986, 35 : A33 - A33
  • [3] Emotional Storytelling in the Classroom: Individual versus Group Interaction between Children and Robots
    Leite, Iolanda
    McCoy, Marissa
    Lohani, Monika
    Ullman, Daniel
    Salomons, Nicole
    Stokes, Charlene
    Rivers, Susan
    Scassellati, Brian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI'15), 2015, : 75 - 82
  • [4] GROUP CONTINGENCY FOR INDIVIDUAL MISBEHAVIORS IN CLASSROOM
    GREENE, RJ
    PRATT, JJ
    MENTAL RETARDATION, 1972, 10 (03): : 33 - 35
  • [6] A comparison of group versus individual cognitive treatment for irritable bowel syndrome
    Vollmer, AJ
    Blanchard, EB
    BIOFEEDBACK AND SELF-REGULATION, 1996, 21 (04): : 356 - 356
  • [7] Differential access to information and anticipated group interaction:: Impact on individual reasoning
    Augustinova, M
    Oberlé, D
    Stasser, GL
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 88 (04) : 619 - 631
  • [8] Individual versus group therapy for obesity: Comparison of dropout rate and treatment outcome
    Minniti, A.
    Bissoli, L.
    Di Francesco, V.
    Fantin, F.
    Mandragona, R.
    Olivieri, M.
    Fontana, G.
    Rinaldi, C.
    Bosello, O.
    Zamboni, M.
    EATING AND WEIGHT DISORDERS-STUDIES ON ANOREXIA BULIMIA AND OBESITY, 2007, 12 (04) : 161 - 167
  • [9] Individual versus group therapy for obesity: Comparison of dropout rate and treatment outcome
    A. Minniti
    L. Bissoli
    V. Di Francesco
    F. Fantin
    R. Mandragona
    M. Olivieri
    G. Fontana
    C. Rinaldi
    O. Bosello
    M. Zamboni
    Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, 2007, 12 : 161 - 167
  • [10] Controlled comparison of individual versus group cognitive therapy for irritable bowel syndrome
    Vollmer, A
    Blanchard, EB
    BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 1998, 29 (01) : 19 - 33