Increased pregnancy outcome after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of human vitrified-warmed blastocysts

被引:34
|
作者
Sciorio, Romualdo [1 ]
Thong, K. J. [1 ]
Pickering, Susan J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Infirm Edinburgh NHS Trust, EFREC, Edinburgh Assisted Concept Programme, 51 Little France Crescent,Old Dalkeith Rd, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Blastocyst vitrification/warming; Closed device vitrification; Pregnancy and implantation rates; Single embryo transfer; FROZEN EMBRYO-TRANSFER; LIVE-BIRTH-RATES; VITRIFICATION; CRYOPRESERVATION; IMPLANTATION; CLEAVAGE; CULTURE; MORPHOLOGY; CYCLES; D5;
D O I
10.1017/S0967199419000273
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Vitrification is a highly efficient technique for the cryopreservation of the human embryo. The effect of delayed blastulation may be responsible for implantation failures and negatively affects in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. The current literature displays discordant results; some studies have announced higher pregnancy rates after day 5 (D5) transfer compared with day 6 (D6) transfer, while others have shown equivalent outcomes. In the present study an investigation into the clinical implications of delayed blastulation (D5 versus D6) was carried out. We performed a retrospective study comparing clinical pregnancies and implantation rates following warmed single blastocyst transfer (WSBT). All patients coming for a programmed warmed transfer at Edinburgh Assisted Conception Programme, EFREC, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, were included in this study and divided in two groups according to the day of blastocyst vitrification: D5 (n = 1563) and D6 (n = 517). The overall survival rate was 95.0% (1976/2080) with no significant difference between the D5 and D6 groups: 95.3% (1489/1563) and 94.2% (487/517) respectively. WSBT of D6 blastocysts resulted in a lower implantation and clinical pregnancy compared with D5 embryos. The implantation rate (IPR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) were respectively 49.4% and 42.6% for the D5 and 37.4% and 32.2% for the D6 embryos, which was statistically significant. The multiple pregnancy rate was 1.32% (1.14% for D5 vs 1.84% for D6). Although the transfer of D6 vitrified-warmed blastocyst remains a reasonable option, priority to a D5 embryo would reduce the time to successful pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 284
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Increased live births after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts
    Tubbing, Alice
    Shaw-Jackson, Chloe
    Ameye, Lieveke
    Colin, Jerome
    Rozenberg, Serge
    Autin, Candice
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2018, 35 (03) : 417 - 424
  • [2] Increased live births after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts
    Alice Tubbing
    Chloë Shaw-Jackson
    Lieveke Ameye
    Jérôme Colin
    Serge Rozenberg
    Candice Autin
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2018, 35 : 417 - 424
  • [3] Perinatal outcomes after vitrified-warmed day 5 blastocyst transfers compared to vitrified-warmed day 6 blastocyst transfers: A meta analysis
    Zeng, MeiFang
    Qin, Su Su
    Wen, Ping
    Xu, ChengMing
    Duan, JinLiang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 247 : 219 - 224
  • [4] COMPLETE ZONA REMOVAL USING LASER ASSISTED HATCHING FOR VITRIFIED-WARMED DAY 6 BLASTOCYSTS INCREASED CLINICAL PREGNANCY AND LIVE BIRTH RATES FOLLOWING SINGLE VITRIFIED-WARMED BLASTOCYST TRANSFER.
    Ueno, S.
    Uchiyama, K.
    Okimura, T.
    Yabuuchi, A.
    Okuno, T.
    Kobayashi, T.
    Kato, K.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (03) : E172 - E172
  • [5] Clinical outcome of vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer performed on day 5 and day 6 after LH surge detected by urine tests
    Reljic, M.
    Kovac, V.
    Lovrec, V. Gavric
    Mlakar, L.
    Testen, P. Kores
    Knez, J.
    Rakic, K.
    Kovacic, B.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 34 : 215 - 215
  • [6] OUTCOME OF VITRIFIED/WARMED DAY 5 BLASTOCYSTS: SHOULD WE CONSIDER MORE ELECTIVE SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFERS?
    Liebermann, J.
    Pelts, E. J.
    Sanchez, S. R.
    Wagner, Y.
    Beltsos, A.
    Rapisarda, J.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (03) : E327 - E327
  • [7] Transfer of day 4 vitrified-warmed embryos yields equally good clinical outcomes as compared to blastocysts vitrified on days 5 or 6
    Menezes, J.
    Lalitkumar, P. G. L.
    Borg, P.
    Vaegter, K.
    Wramsby, M.
    Wramsby, H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 : 3 - 3
  • [8] Is pregnancy rate following transfer of high quality blastocysts vitrified at day 6 comparable to that of blastocysts vitrified at day 5?
    Meriano, J.
    Haas, J.
    Casper, R.
    Laskin, C.
    Cadesky, K.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 232 - 232
  • [9] Clinical outcome after transfer of human blastocysts (BLs) vitrified on day 5 and on day 6 with a cryoloop technique.
    Mukaida, T
    Wada, S
    Tomiyama, T
    Oka, C
    Takahashi, K
    Kasai, M
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 78 (03) : S12 - S12
  • [10] Single blastocyst transfer (SET) and pregnancy outcome of day 5 and day 6 human blastocysts vitrified using a closed device
    Sciorio, Romualdo
    Thong, K. J.
    Pickering, Susan J.
    CRYOBIOLOGY, 2018, 84 : 40 - 45