Mitigation of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane emissions from manure management chains: a meta-analysis and integrated assessment

被引:214
|
作者
Hou, Yong [1 ]
Velthof, Gerard L. [2 ]
Oenema, Oene [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Soil Qual Grp, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Alterra, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
ammonia; composting; greenhouse gases; injection; meta-analysis; processing; separation; trade-offs; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DIETARY CRUDE PROTEIN; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; FATTY-ACID CONCENTRATION; DAIRY-CATTLE BUILDINGS; SUGAR-BEET PULP; PIG SLURRY; GASEOUS EMISSIONS; NUTRIENT DIGESTIBILITY; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.12767
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Livestock manure contributes considerably to global emissions of ammonia (NH3) and greenhouse gases (GHG), especially methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). Various measures have been developed to mitigate these emissions, but most of these focus on one specific gas and/or emission source. Here, we present a meta-analysis and integrated assessment of the effects of mitigation measures on NH3, CH4 and (direct and indirect) N2O emissions from the whole manure management chain. We analysed the effects of mitigation technologies on NH3, CH4 and N2O emissions from individual sources statistically using results of 126 published studies. Whole-chain effects on NH3 and GHG emissions were assessed through scenario analysis. Significant NH3 reduction efficiencies were observed for (i) housing via lowering the dietary crude protein (CP) content (24-65%, compared to the reference situation), for (ii) external slurry storages via acidification (83%) and covers of straw (78%) or artificial films (98%), for (iii) solid manure storages via compaction and covering (61%, compared to composting), and for (iv) manure application through band spreading (55%, compared to surface application), incorporation (70%) and injection (80%). Acidification decreased CH4 emissions from stored slurry by 87%. Significant increases in N2O emissions were found for straw-covered slurry storages (by two orders of magnitude) and manure injection (by 26-199%). These side-effects of straw covers and slurry injection on N2O emission were relatively small when considering the total GHG emissions from the manure chain. Lowering the CP content of feed and acidifying slurry are strategies that consistently reduce NH3 and GHG emissions in the whole chain. Other strategies may reduce emissions of a specific gas or emissions source, by which there is a risk of unwanted trade-offs in the manure management chain. Proper farm-scale combinations of mitigation measures are important to minimize impacts of livestock production on global emissions of NH3 and GHG.
引用
收藏
页码:1293 / 1312
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mitigation of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane emissions during solid waste composting with different additives: A meta-analysis
    Cao, Yubo
    Wang, Xuan
    Bai, Zhaohai
    Chadwick, David
    Misselbrook, Tom
    Sommer, Sven G.
    Qin, Wei
    Ma, Lin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 235 : 626 - 635
  • [2] Algorithms for calculating methane and nitrous oxide emissions from manure management
    Sommer, SG
    Petersen, SO
    Moller, HB
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2004, 69 (02) : 143 - 154
  • [3] Algorithms for calculating methane and nitrous oxide emissions from manure management
    S.G. Sommer
    S.O. Petersen
    H.B. Møller
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2004, 69 : 143 - 154
  • [4] Towards a representative assessment of methane and nitrous oxide emissions and mitigation options from manure management of beef cattle feedlots in Brazil
    Costa Junior, C.
    Cerri, C. E. P.
    Dorich, C. D.
    Maia, S. M. F.
    Bernoux, M.
    Cerri, C. C.
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2015, 20 (03) : 425 - 438
  • [5] Towards a representative assessment of methane and nitrous oxide emissions and mitigation options from manure management of beef cattle feedlots in Brazil
    C. Costa Junior
    C. E. P. Cerri
    C. D. Dorich
    S. M. F. Maia
    M. Bernoux
    C. C. Cerri
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2015, 20 : 425 - 438
  • [6] Emissions of nitrous oxide, ammonia and methane from Australian layer-hen manure storage with a mitigation strategy applied
    Naylor, T. A.
    Wiedemann, S. G.
    Phillips, F. A.
    Warren, B.
    McGahan, E. J.
    Murphy, C. M.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (09) : 1367 - 1375
  • [7] Emission factors for methane and nitrous oxide from manure management and mitigation options
    Groenestein, Karin
    Mosquera, Julio
    Van der Sluis, Sietske
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2012, 9 : 139 - 146
  • [8] Emissions of Ammonia, Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrous Oxide from Dairy Cattle Housing and Manure Management Systems
    Leytem, April B.
    Dungan, Robert S.
    Bjorneberg, David L.
    Koehn, Anita C.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2011, 40 (05) : 1383 - 1394
  • [9] 2004 Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Manure Management in South Africa
    Moeletsi, Mokhele Edmond
    Tongwane, Mphethe Isaac
    ANIMALS, 2015, 5 (02): : 193 - 205
  • [10] Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane from cattle manure heaps: effect of compaction and covering
    Chadwick, DR
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 39 (04) : 787 - 799