Performance of ozone as a disinectant for combined sewer overflow

被引:23
|
作者
Wojtenko, I [1 ]
Stinson, MK [1 ]
Field, R [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Urban Watershed Management Branch, Water Supply & Water Resources Div, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Edison, NJ 08837 USA
关键词
ozone; high-rate disinfection; combined sewer overflow (CSO); pathogens; microorganisms; microbes; suspended solids;
D O I
10.1080/20016491089235
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Disinfection of combined sewer overflow (CSO) minimizes the number of disease-causing microorganisms (pathogens) released into receiving waters. Currently, the primary disinfecting agent used in the United States for wastewater treatment is chlorine (Cl-2); however, Cl-2 produces problems in aquatic ecosystems. As a result, alternative disinfectants are being investigated. This article presents the results of a state-of-the-art review of the effectiveness of ozone (O-3) for CSO disinfection. Data on major studies investigating CSO ozonation as well as its advantages and disadvantages are presented. Ozone inactivates a wider range of microorganisms than Cl-2. In addition, O-3 has a relatively high disinfection kill power, releases limited byproducts, is nonreactive with ammonia, and has an excellent ability for removing undesirable odor and color. The effectiveness of ozonation was found to be strongly dependent upon the occluding effects of suspended solids and influent quality. The reaction of O-3 with water impurities is a major limitation. In general, ozonation can be an effective, but expensive, technology for CSO disinfection.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 309
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modelling the performance of combined-sewer overflow chambers
    Harwood, R
    Saul, AJ
    JOURNAL OF THE CHARTERED INSTITUTION OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2001, 15 (04): : 300 - 304
  • [2] The performance of a novel combined sewer overflow with perforated conical screen
    Jefferies, C
    Allinson, CL
    McKeown, J
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 37 (01) : 243 - 250
  • [3] URBAN RUNOFF AND COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW
    FIELD, R
    KNOWLES, D
    JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1975, 47 (06): : 1352 - 1369
  • [4] URBAN RUNOFF AND COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW
    WALKER, K
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF THE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1991, 63 (04): : 433 - 436
  • [5] URBAN RUNOFF AND COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW
    WALKER, KP
    DEGUIDA, RN
    WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 1995, 67 (04) : 414 - 419
  • [6] URBAN RUNOFF AND COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW
    MOFFA, PE
    FREEDMAN, SD
    HAGARMAN, JA
    DEGUIDA, RN
    JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1983, 55 (06): : 676 - 679
  • [7] URBAN RUNOFF AND COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW
    FIELD, R
    SZEELEY, PJ
    JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1974, 46 (06): : 1209 - 1226
  • [8] URBAN RUNOFF AND COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW
    FIELD, R
    CIBIK, C
    JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1980, 52 (06): : 1290 - 1307
  • [9] URBAN RUNOFF AND COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW
    FIELD, R
    CURTIS, J
    BOWDEN, R
    JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1976, 48 (06): : 1191 - 1206
  • [10] URBAN RUNOFF AND COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW
    MOFFA, PE
    FREEDMAN, SD
    DEGUIDA, RN
    JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1985, 57 (06): : 563 - 566