Comparative Immunovirological and Clinical Responses to Antiretroviral Therapy Between HIV-1 Group O and HIV-1 Group M Infected Patients

被引:5
|
作者
Kouanfack, Charles [1 ]
Unal, Guillemette [2 ]
Schaeffer, Laura [3 ]
Kfutwah, Anfumbom [4 ,7 ]
Aghokeng, Avelin [5 ,8 ]
Mougnutou, Rose [1 ]
Tchemgui-Noumsi, Nathalie [1 ]
Alessandri-Gradt, Elodie [2 ]
Delaporte, Eric [5 ]
Simon, Francois [6 ]
Vray, Muriel [3 ]
Plantier, Jean-Christophe [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dschang, Yaounde Cent Hosp, Fac Med & Pharmaceut Sci, Dschang, Cameroon
[2] Univ Rouen Normandie, Normandy Univ, Grp Rech Adaptat Microbienne,EA 2656, Rouen Univ Hosp,Lab Virol,Natl Reference Ctr HIV, Paris, France
[3] Inst Pasteur, Unit Epidemiol Emerging Dis, Paris, France
[4] Ctr Pasteur Cameroon, Virol Dept, Yaounde, Cameroon
[5] Univ Montpellier, Inst Rech & Dev, Inst Natl Sante & Rech Med, Rech Translat VIH & Malad Infect, Paris, France
[6] Univ Hosp St Louis, Fac Med Paris Diderot, Paris, France
[7] WHO, Intercountry Support Team Cent African Subreg, Libreville, Gabon
[8] Montpellier Univ, Inst Rech Dev, Ctr Natl Rech Sci Malad Infect & Vecteurs Ecol Ge, Montpellier, France
关键词
HIV-1 group O; immunovirological response; genetic diversity; cART; TYPE-1; GROUP-O; REVERSE-TRANSCRIPTASE; GENETICALLY DIVERSE; RETROVIRUS; EVOLUTION; DIAGNOSIS; CAMEROON; TIME; SUSCEPTIBILITY; RALTEGRAVIR;
D O I
10.1093/cid/ciz371
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Little is known about impact of genetic divergence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group O (HIV-1/O) relative to HIV-1 group M (HIV-1/M) on therapeutic outcomes. We aimed to determine if responses to standardized combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) were similar between groups despite strain divergence. Methods. We performed an open nonrandomized study comparing the immunological, virological, and clinical responses to cART based on 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus 1 ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor, in naive and paired HIV-1/O vs HIV-1/M infected (+) patients (ratio 1:2), matched on several criteria. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with undetectable plasma viral load (pVL, threshold 60 copies/mL) at week (W) 48. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with undetectable pVL at W24 and W96 and CD4 evolution between baseline and W24, W48, and W96. Results. Forty-seven HIV-1/O+ and 94 HIV-1/M+ patients were included. Mean pVL at baseline was significantly lower by 1 log for HIV-1/O+ vs HIV-1/M+ patients. At W48, no significant difference was observed between populations with undetectable pVL and differences at W24 and W96 were not significant. A difference in CD4 gain was observed in favor of HIV-1/M at W48 and W96, but this was not significant when adjusted on both matched criteria and pVL at baseline. Conclusions. Our data demonstrate similar immunovirological and clinical response between HIV-1/O+ and HIV-1/M+ patients. They also reveal significantly lower baseline replication for HIV-1/O variants, suggesting specific virological properties and physiopathology that now need to be addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:1471 / 1477
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HIV-1 group M superinfection in an HIV-1 group O-infected patient
    Plantier, JC
    Lemée, W
    Dorval, L
    Gueudin, M
    Braun, J
    Hutin, P
    Ruffault, A
    Simon, F
    AIDS, 2004, 18 (18) : 2444 - 2446
  • [2] HIV-1 group O resistance pathway with raltegravir is similar to HIV-1 group M
    Alessandri-Gradt, Elodie
    Morgand, Marjolaine
    Delaugerre, Constance
    Peytavin, Gilles
    Sellier, Pierre
    Simon, Francois
    Plantier, Jean-Christophe
    AIDS, 2015, 29 (10) : 1271 - 1273
  • [3] Mortality and immunovirological outcomes on antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 and HIV-2-infected individuals in the Gambia
    Peterson, Ingrid
    Togun, Oluwatoyin
    de Silva, Thushan
    Oko, Francis
    Rowland-Jones, Sarah
    Jaye, Assan
    Peterson, Kevin
    AIDS, 2011, 25 (17) : 2167 - 2175
  • [4] Reactivity of a new HIV-1 group O third generation A-HIV-1/-2 assay with an unusual HIV-1 seroconversion panel and HIV-1 group O group M subtyped samples
    van Binsbergen, J
    Keur, W
    van der Graaf, M
    Siebelink, A
    Jacobs, A
    de Rijk, D
    Toonen, J
    Zekeng, L
    Ze, EA
    Gurtler, LG
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 1997, 69 (1-2) : 29 - 37
  • [5] REDUCED CAPACITY OF ANTIBODIES FROM PATIENTS INFECTED WITH HIV-1 GROUP-O TO NEUTRALIZE PRIMARY ISOLATES OF HIV-1 GROUP-M VIRUSES
    NYAMBI, P
    NKENGASONG, J
    PEETERS, M
    SIMON, F
    EBERLE, J
    JANSENS, W
    FRANSEN, K
    WILLEMS, B
    VEREECKEN, K
    HEYNDICKX, L
    PIOT, P
    VANDERGROEN, G
    AIDS RESEARCH AND HUMAN RETROVIRUSES, 1995, 11 : S150 - S150
  • [6] Antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infected children
    Lodha, R
    Upadhyay, A
    Kabra, SK
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2005, 42 (08) : 789 - 796
  • [7] HIV-1 GROUP-O SENSITIVITY TO ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS
    DESCAMPS, D
    COLLIN, G
    LOUSSERTAJAKA, I
    SARAGOSTI, S
    SIMON, F
    BRUNVEZINET, F
    AIDS, 1995, 9 (08) : 977 - 978
  • [8] Hearing loss and antiretroviral therapy in patients infected with HIV-1
    Marra, CM
    Wechkin, HA
    Longstreth, WT
    Rees, TS
    Syapin, CL
    Gates, GA
    ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1997, 54 (04) : 407 - 410
  • [9] Quantitative p24 antigenemia for monitoring response to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 group O infected patients
    Machuca, A
    Gutiérrez, M
    Baquero, M
    Mur, A
    Soriano, V
    AIDS, 1998, 12 : S73 - S73
  • [10] HIV-1 group O and group M dual infection in Benin
    Heyndrickx, L
    Alary, M
    Janssens, W
    Davo, N
    vanderGroen, G
    LANCET, 1996, 347 (9005): : 902 - 903