Use and abuse of empirical knowledge in contemporary bioethics: A critical analysis of empirical arguments employed in the controversy surrounding stem cell research

被引：4

|

作者：

Solbakk, JH ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Oslo, Fac Med, Ctr Med Eth, Oslo, Norway

[2] Univ Bergen, Fac Med, Ctr Int Hlth, Bergen, Norway

来源：

CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS | 2003年 / 12卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1017/S0963180103124073

中图分类号：

R19 [保健组织与事业（卫生事业管理）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：384 / 392

页数：9

相关论文

共 6 条

[1] Use and abuse of empirical knowledge in contemporary bioethics.
Solbakk J.H.
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2004, 7 (1) : 5 - 16
[2] The Importance of Empirical Research in Bioethics: The Case of Human Embryo Stem Cell Research
Somerville, Margaret A.
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2005, 27 (10) : 929 - 930
[3] Eligibility of Cryopreserved Human Embryos for Stem Cell Research in Canada The Importance of Empirical Research in Bioethics: The Case of Human Embryo Stem Cell Research Response
Somerville, Margaret A.
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2006, 28 (01) : 16 - 17
[4] Marginalizing Experience: A Critical Analysis of Public Discourse Surrounding Stem Cell Research in Australia (2005–6)
Tamra Lysaght
John Miles Little
Ian Harold Kerridge
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2011, 8 : 191 - 202
[5] Marginalizing Experience: A Critical Analysis of Public Discourse Surrounding Stem Cell Research in Australia (2005-6)
Lysaght, Tamra
Little, John Miles
Kerridge, Ian Harold
JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY, 2011, 8 (02) : 191 - 202
[6] Rhetoric, power and legitimacy: A critical analysis of the public policy disputes surrounding stem cell research in Australia (2005-6)
Lysaght, Tamra
Kerridge, Ian
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2012, 21 (02) : 195 - 210