Willingness to pay: a feasible method for assessing treatment benefits in epilepsy?

被引:11
|
作者
Stavem, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Hosp Akershus, HELTEF Fdn Hlth Serv Res, N-1474 Nordbyhagen, Norway
[2] Cent Hosp Akershus, Dept Med, N-1474 Nordbyhagen, Norway
来源
关键词
willingness to pay; epilepsy; health economics; evaluation; contingent valuation;
D O I
10.1053/seiz.1998.0242
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Contingent valuation using willingness to pay (WTP) is one of the methods available for assessing the value of a new technology or treatment for a disease in monetary terms. Experience with this method is lacking in epilepsy. The objectives of this study were to assess the acceptability of the WTP method in epilepsy, the level of the responses, and to investigate its validity by comparison with other non-monetary preference measures. Among 397 patients with epilepsy responding to a comprehensive questionnaire, 82 were randomly selected far an interview. They were asked about their WTP for an imaginary new technology which could permanently cure their epilepsy. Fifty-nine patients participated and 57 completed the interview (32 women; mean age 44 years), the majority with well-controlled epilepsy. The patients indicated a median WTP of: Norwegian Kroner (NOK) 150, 000 (USD 20,000; GBP 11, 800), interquartile range NOK 50,000-350, 000 (USD 6, 667-46,667; GBP 3, 937-27,559) for this cure. Nan-response: was Low, indicating high acceptability of this method. There was little association between WTP and other preference. measures; the Spearman rank correlation coefficient was -0.09 and -0.12 with time trade-off and standard gamble respectively, questioning the validity of this method.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 19
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing community values in health care: Is the 'willingness to pay' method feasible?
    Donaldson, C
    Farrar, S
    Mapp, T
    Walker, A
    Macphee, S
    HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS, 1997, 5 (01) : 7 - 29
  • [2] Assessing community values in health care: Is the ‘Willingness to pay’ method feasible?
    Cam Donaldson
    Shelley Farrar
    Tracy Mapp
    Andrew Walker
    Susan Macphee
    Health Care Analysis, 1997, 5 (1) : 7 - 29
  • [3] Estimating the economic benefits of avoiding food-borne risk: Is 'willingness to pay' feasible?
    Donaldson, C
    Mapp, T
    Ryan, M
    Curtin, K
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 1996, 116 (03): : 285 - 294
  • [4] Willingness to pay versus willingness to travel: Assessing the recreational benefits from Dartmoor National Park
    Heyes, C
    Heyes, A
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 50 (01) : 124 - 139
  • [5] Assessing preferences for prevention versus treatment using willingness to pay
    Corso, PS
    Hammitt, JK
    Graham, JD
    Dicker, RC
    Goldie, SJ
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2002, 22 (05) : S92 - S101
  • [6] Willingness to Pay as a Measure of Health Benefits
    Mohan V. Bala
    Josephine A. Mauskopf
    Lisa L. Wood
    PharmacoEconomics, 1999, 15 : 9 - 18
  • [7] Willingness to pay as a measure of health benefits
    Bala, MV
    Mauskopf, JA
    Wood, LL
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1999, 15 (01) : 9 - 18
  • [8] Assessing willingness to pay for cancer prevention
    Milligan, Michael A.
    Bohara, Alok K.
    Pagan, Jose A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2010, 10 (04): : 301 - 314
  • [9] A novel method for assessing distress intolerance: Adaptation of a measure of willingness to pay
    McHugh, R. Kathryn
    Hearon, Bridget A.
    Halperin, Daniella M.
    Otto, Michael W.
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 42 (04) : 440 - 446
  • [10] Assessing willingness to pay for cancer prevention
    Michael A. Milligan
    Alok K. Bohara
    José A. Pagán
    International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 2010, 10 : 301 - 314