More than agents: Federal bureaucrats as information suppliers in policymaking(sic)(sic)(sic)Palabras clave

被引:9
|
作者
Shafran, JoBeth S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Carolina Univ, Polit Sci & Publ Affairs, 351 Stillwell,1 Univ Dr, Cullowhee, NC 28723 USA
关键词
congressional hearings; federal bureaucrats; information processing; POLICY PROCESS; ORGANIZATIONS; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1111/psj.12455
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Bureaucrats are frequently conceptualized as agents of Congress, with much focus placed on their expertise as policy implementers or evaluators. That same expertise, though, allows bureaucrats to supply Congress with information throughout the policy process. Bureaucrats are just one of the many actors that compete to supply Congress with information to define problems and develop solutions. Congressional committees must prioritize all available information, deciding what to attend and what to ignore. I argue that bureaucrats are more likely to testify at hearings when there is (1) limited availability of alternative information sources, (2) the information they hold is necessary for achieving committee goals or tasks (ex. agency oversight), and (3) the information they have can alleviate diverse committee workloads. Using a new dataset of witnesses testifying at congressional committee hearings, I find that the prioritization of bureaucrats as witnesses is explainable in terms of policy area, committee type, and committee agenda.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 943
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Policy Regime Decay(sic)(sic)(sic)Palabras clave
    Sheingate, Adam
    POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2022, 50 (01) : 65 - 89
  • [2] Sharpening Advocacy Coalitions(sic)(sic)(sic)Palabras clave
    Weible, Christopher M.
    Ingold, Karin
    Nohrstedt, Daniel
    Henry, Adam Douglas
    Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.
    POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2020, 48 (04) : 1054 - 1081
  • [3] Is the East Asia quadrilateral sustainable?Palabras Clave(sic)(sic)(sic)
    Rao, Anand
    ASIAN POLITICS & POLICY, 2021, 13 (02) : 266 - 279
  • [4] The institutional grammar in policy process research(sic)(sic)(sic)Palabras clave
    Siddiki, Saba
    Frantz, Christopher
    POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2022, 50 (02) : 299 - 314
  • [5] Updating the Institutional Collective Action Framework(sic)(sic)(sic)Palabras clave
    Kim, Serena Y.
    Swann, William L.
    Weible, Christopher M.
    Bolognesi, Thomas
    Krause, Rachel M.
    Park, Angela Y. S.
    Tang, Tian
    Maletsky, Kiernan
    Feiock, Richard C.
    POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2022, 50 (01) : 9 - 34
  • [6] A Research Agenda for the Study of Policy Entrepreneurs(sic)(sic)(sic)Palabras clave
    Petridou, Evangelia
    Mintrom, Michael
    POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2021, 49 (04) : 943 - 967
  • [7] Social Science and the Analysis of Environmental Policy(sic)(sic)(sic)Palabras clave
    Coglianese, Cary
    Starobin, Shana M.
    REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH, 2020, 37 (05) : 578 - 604
  • [8] Lobbying responsiveness to congressional policy agendas(sic)(sic)(sic)Palabras clave
    Fagan, E. J.
    Furnas, Alexander C.
    POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2024, 52 (01) : 11 - 29
  • [9] The benefits of specialized knowledge in polycentric governance(sic)(sic)(sic)Palabras clave
    Vantaggiato, Francesca Pia
    Lubell, Mark
    POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2022, 50 (04) : 849 - 876
  • [10] Helping Couples in the Shadow of COVID-19Palabras clave(sic)(sic)(sic)
    Stanley, Scott M.
    Markman, Howard J.
    FAMILY PROCESS, 2020, 59 (03) : 937 - 955