Game analysis of environmental cost allocation in green supply chain under fairness preference

被引:22
|
作者
Qin, Qin [1 ]
Jiang, Maoting [1 ]
Xie, Jianmin [1 ]
He, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Mianyang 6210100, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Green supply chain; Fairness preference; Stackelberg game; Cost allocation; COORDINATION; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.020
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Cost allocation is a way to promote enterprises to actively implement green supply chain management, and the behavior preference of decision makers will affect the process. This paper considers the situation that manufacturer has fairness preference and retailer is fair neutral, and constructs a secondary supply chain composed of a single manufacturer and a single retailer. We explore two models of cost allocation-based on the Stackelberg model, the impact of retailers' nonparticipation/participation in cost allocation on supply chain is discussed, while through the Nash bargaining model, the range and optimal solution of the environmental cost allocation ratio are determined. And we show how product wholesale prices, retail prices, green innovation investment, and the optimal ratio of environmental cost allocation are influenced by fairness preference. The results show that retailers' participation in environmental cost allocation will increase the level of product greenness and make the entire supply chain Pareto optimal. The strong fairness preference of manufacturer will weaken the positive effect of retailers participating in cost allocation on the supply chain. Therefore, the government and enterprises should adopt incentive measures to actively promote the collaboration between channel partners in order to share the environmental cost, and manufacturers should pay less attention to fairness. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:6014 / 6022
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Game-Theoretic Analysis of Green Supply Chain Under Cost-Sharing Contract with Fairness Concerns
    Sharma, Abhishek
    Jain, Deepika
    INTERNATIONAL GAME THEORY REVIEW, 2021, 23 (02)
  • [2] Game Analysis in a Supply Chain under Lexicographic Allocation Mechanism with Asymmetric Cost
    Li, Jianbin
    Xu, Minghui
    Zhang, Yuanyuan
    2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-15, 2007, : 4910 - +
  • [3] Revenue sharing and green innovation investment of green supply chain under fairness preference
    Jiang M.-J.
    Chen D.-Y.
    Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2020, 35 (06): : 1463 - 1468
  • [4] Evolutionary Game Analysis of Green Supply Chain Management Diffusion under Environmental Regulation
    Qi, Kai
    Guo, Xinyuan
    Guan, Xinying
    Yang, Zhi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [5] Optimal Decisions of a Green Supply Chain under the Joint Action of Fairness Preference and Subsidy to the Manufacturer
    Zhang, Zi-yuan
    Fu, Duan-xiang
    Zhou, Qing
    DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2020, 2020
  • [6] Green supply chain considering fairness preference and corporate social responsibility
    Gong Y.-D.
    Chen M.-Z.
    Gong, Yan-De (gongyande@126.com), 1743, Northeast University (36): : 1743 - 1753
  • [7] Game Analysis of Supply Chain Members under the Predominance of Risk Preference and Suppliers
    Huang Jianhui
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM 2015: ASIA-PACIFIC PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2015, : 75 - 82
  • [8] Cost Allocation Based on Game Theory in Supply Chain Coordination
    Liu Shuyong
    Chen Yang
    Li Nan
    Qu Lili
    WMSO: 2008 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MODELLING, SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 233 - 236
  • [9] Game Models for Closed-Supply Chain with Different Competition-Cooperation Relationships under Fairness Preference
    Nian, Zhang
    Bin, Li
    Kun, Wei
    Mengxue, Wang
    COMPLEXITY, 2020, 2020
  • [10] Supply chain decisions under asymmetric information with cost and fairness concern
    Qin, Yanhong
    Shao, Yunfei
    ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 13 (10) : 1347 - 1366