The use of Permacol® biological mesh for complex abdominal wall repair

被引:3
|
作者
Dirani, Mazen [1 ]
Chahine, Elias [1 ]
D'Alessandro, Antonio [1 ]
Chouillard, Marc-Anthony [1 ]
Gumbs, Andrew A. [1 ]
Chouillard, Elie [1 ]
机构
[1] Poissy St Germain Med Ctr, Dept Gen & Digest Surg, 10 Rue Champ Gaillard, F-78300 Poissy, France
来源
MINERVA SURGERY | 2022年 / 77卷 / 01期
关键词
Hernia; ventral; Surgical mesh; Infections; ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; RECONSTRUCTION; COLLAGEN; SUTURE; IMPLANTS;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-5691.21.08779-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal wall repair (CAWR) remains challenging, especially in contaminated fields where the use of a synthetic mesh is associated with prohibitively complication rates. Consequently, biological mesh has been proposed as an alternative. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using Permacol (R) in patients who had CAWR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the files of patients who had CAWR using the Permacol (R) mesh. Analysis included patients' preoperative characteristics, procedural parameters, and early and late post-operative complications in- cluding mainly recurrence. A multivariate regression model was performed to determine factors that influence 24-months recurrence rate. RESULTS: Between January 2009 and December 2018, 75 patients. The most common indication was hernia in a con- taminated field (48.0%) and abdominal wall defect greater than 10 cm in diameter (36%). Overall, 44% of our patients were Centers for Disease Control (CDC) class II or III and 81.3% fall into category II or III according to the Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) classification. Recurrence rate of our series was 9.3%. Complete fascial closure was achieved in 60 patients (80%). Upon univariate analysis complete fascial closure, posterior component separation, se- roma drainage, BMI>30 kg/m2 and age >65 years, VHWD grade >2, DINDO CLAVIEN class >2 affected the recurrence rate at 2 years follow-up. When subcutaneous drains are placed prophylactically, recurrence rates drop from 38.7% (5/14) to 3.3% (2/61 patients) when drains are placed at the time of operation (P=0.02). Only fascial closure affected the 24-months recurrence rate on multivariate analysis (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Permacol (R) surgical implant use for CAWR is safe with a relatively low rate of hernia recurrence at 2 years. Prophylactic subcutaneous drain placement may reduce the risk of hernia recurrence. The presence of contami- nated fields does not appear to influence hernia recurrence when Permacol (R) is used, in fact, the only factor that affects recurrence rate at 24-months on multivariate analysis is completeness of the fascial closure.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 49
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A retrospective, Italian multicenter study of complex abdominal wall defect repair with a Permacol biological mesh
    Russello, Domenico
    Sofia, Maria
    Conti, Piero
    Latteri, Saverio
    Pesce, Antonino
    Scaravilli, Francesco
    Vasta, Fabio
    Trombatore, Giovanni
    Randazzo, Valentina
    Schembari, Elena
    Barchitta, Martina
    Agodi, Antonella
    La Greca, Gaetano
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01) : 3367
  • [2] A retrospective, Italian multicenter study of complex abdominal wall defect repair with a Permacol biological mesh
    Domenico Russello
    Maria Sofia
    Piero Conti
    Saverio Latteri
    Antonino Pesce
    Francesco Scaravilli
    Fabio Vasta
    Giovanni Trombatore
    Valentina Randazzo
    Elena Schembari
    Martina Barchitta
    Antonella Agodi
    Gaetano La Greca
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [3] Outcome of Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair with Permacol™ Biologic Mesh
    Cheng, Amy W.
    Abbas, Maher A.
    Tejirian, Talar
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2013, 79 (10) : 992 - 996
  • [4] Porcine xenograft 'Permacol' mesh used to repair massive complex abdominal wall hernia
    Brown, J.
    Joypaul, B. V.
    Proceedings of the Second Joint Meeting European Council of Coloproctology: First National Congress Italian Society of Colo-Rectal Surgery, 2005, : 59 - 63
  • [5] Rejection of Permacol~ mesh used in abdominal wall repair:A case report
    Franchesca T Wotton
    Jacob A Akoh
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2009, 15 (34) : 4331 - 4333
  • [6] Rejection of Permacol® mesh used in abdominal wall repair: A case report
    Wotton, Franchesca T.
    Akoh, Jacob A.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 15 (34) : 4331 - 4333
  • [7] Interposition biological mesh repair of complex abdominal wall defects
    Okechukwu, O.
    Yiannoullou, P.
    Kanesalingam, K.
    van Dellen, D.
    Augustine, T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 : 80 - 80
  • [8] Outcome of Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair with Biologic Mesh: Permacol™ versus Strattice™
    Cheng, Amy W.
    Abbas, Maher A.
    Tejirian, Talar
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2014, 80 (10) : 999 - 1002
  • [9] Comparison of Permacol™ and Strattice™ for the repair of abdominal wall defects
    Mulier, K. E.
    Nguyen, A. H.
    Delaney, J. P.
    Marquez, S.
    HERNIA, 2011, 15 (03) : 315 - 319
  • [10] Comparison of Permacol™ and Strattice™ for the repair of abdominal wall defects
    K. E. Mulier
    A. H. Nguyen
    J. P. Delaney
    S. Marquez
    Hernia, 2011, 15 : 315 - 319