Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Xu, Keteng [1 ]
Chen, Qun [2 ]
Yan, Qing [1 ]
Wang, Qin [1 ]
Sun, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Huangshan City Peoples Hosp, Dept Joint Surg, Huangshan, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Rheumatol, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Navigation; Knee osteoarthritis; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Meta-analysis; LIMB ALIGNMENT; FOLLOW-UP; OSTEOARTHRITIS; ACCURACY; IMPLANT; REPLACEMENT; SURVIVAL; REVISION; QUALITY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-022-03013-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Though unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a useful procedure to treat knee osteoarthritis, it remains a great controversial point as to if navigated systems are able to achieve better accuracy of limb alignment and greater clinic results. Current meta-analysis was conducted to explore if better clinical outcomes and radiographic outcomes could be acquired in the navigated system when compared with conventional procedures. Methods We identified studies in the online databases, including Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science before May 2021. The PRISMA guidelines in this report were strictly followed. Our research was completed via Review Manager 5.4 software. Results Fourteen articles were included, involving 852 knees. The present meta-analysis displayed that the navigated system had remarkably improved outcomes in inliers of mechanical axis (MA) (P < 0.01), MA in the Kennedy's central zone (Zone C) (P = 0.04), inliers of the coronal femoral component (P < 0.01), inliers of the coronal tibial component (P = 0.005), inliers of the sagittal femoral component (P = 0.03), inliers of the sagittal tibial component (P = 0.002) and Range Of Motion (ROM) (P = 0.04). No significant differences were observed in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (P = 0.15), American Knee Society Knee Score (KSS score) (P = 0.61) and postoperative complications (P = 0.73) between these 2 groups. Regarding operating time, the navigated group was 10.63 min longer in contrast to the traditional group. Conclusion Based on our research, the navigated system provided better radiographic outcomes and no significant difference in the risk of complications with longer surgical time than the conventional techniques. But no significant differences were found in functional outcomes. Because the included studies were small samples and short-term follow-up, high-quality RCTs with large patients and sufficient follow-up are required to identify the long-term effect of the navigated system.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
    Keteng Xu
    Qun Chen
    Qing Yan
    Qin Wang
    Jun Sun
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17
  • [2] Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in high tibial osteotomy (HTO): a meta-analysis
    Xu, Keteng
    Wang, Weichao
    Wang, Qin
    Sun, Jun
    Fang, Chen
    Sun, Yusheng
    Shi, Tulong
    Wu, Xun
    Yan, Qing
    COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2022, 27 (01) : 63 - 73
  • [3] Computer-assisted FluoroGuide navigation of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
    Ma, Burton
    Rudan, John
    Chakravertty, Raja
    Grant, Heather
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 52 (05) : 379 - 385
  • [4] Computer-assisted Revision of Failed Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
    Confalonieri, Norberto
    Manzotti, Alfonso
    Chemello, Cesare
    Cerveri, Pietro
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 33 (10) : 52 - 57
  • [5] Comparison of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis
    Zhang, Qidong
    Guo, Wanshou
    Zhang, Qian
    Sun, Ruihua
    Liu, Zhaohui
    Cheng, Liming
    Xia, Yinyin
    Chen, Guanggang
    Ding, Ran
    Zhu, Di
    Li, Zirong
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2010, 21 (05): : 497 - 503
  • [6] Computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using dedicated software versus a conventional technique
    Alfonso Manzotti
    Pietro Cerveri
    Chris Pullen
    Norberto Confalonieri
    International Orthopaedics, 2014, 38 : 457 - 463
  • [7] Improved accuracy in computer-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
    Patrick Weber
    Alexander Crispin
    Florian Schmidutz
    Sandra Utzschneider
    Matthias F. Pietschmann
    Volkmar Jansson
    Peter E. Müller
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2013, 21 : 2453 - 2461
  • [8] Improved accuracy in computer-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
    Weber, Patrick
    Crispin, Alexander
    Schmidutz, Florian
    Utzschneider, Sandra
    Pietschmann, Matthias F.
    Jansson, Volkmar
    Mueller, Peter E.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2013, 21 (11) : 2453 - 2461
  • [9] Computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using dedicated software versus a conventional technique
    Manzotti, Alfonso
    Cerveri, Pietro
    Pullen, Chris
    Confalonieri, Norberto
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (02) : 457 - 463
  • [10] Comparing clinical and radiographic outcomes of robotic-assisted, computer-navigated and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Kunze, Kyle N.
    Farivar, Daniel
    Premkumar, Ajay
    Cross, Michael B.
    Della Valle, Alejandro Gonzalez
    Pearle, Andrew D.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 25 : 212 - 219