Nature of Evidence in Religion and Natural Science

被引：7
|
作者：
Nieminen, Petteri [1 ]
Loikkanen, Juuso [2 ]
Ryokas, Esko [2 ]
Mustonen, Anne-Mari [3 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, Sch Med, Med Biol, Joensuu, Finland
[2] UEF, Systemat Theol, Joensuu, Finland
[3] UEF, Sch Med, Joensuu, Finland
来源：
THEOLOGY AND SCIENCE | 2020年 / 18卷 / 03期
关键词：
Confirmation bias; evidence; falsification; hyperactive agent-detection device; ignosticism; igtheism; religion-science models; testimonial; INTERCESSORY PRAYER; ANALYTIC THINKING; ARGUMENTATION; CRITICISM; DOGMATISM; BELIEVERS; SURVIVAL; RABIES; BIASES;
D O I：
10.1080/14746700.2020.1786221
中图分类号：
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号：
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要：
Regardless of the model for identifying the relationship between science and religion-conflict, independence, dialogue, integration-insufficient attention has been given to the way evidence is processed in each field. Whereas religious claims are based on experiential evidence, scientific claims are based on experimental evidence. Recognizing this difference, the independence or two-language model along with the ethical alliance model would be the most fitting basis for future religion-science interaction.
引用
收藏
页码：448 / 474
页数：27
相关论文
共 50 条
12345