Economic costs of benign prostatic hyperplasia in the private sector

被引:136
|
作者
Saigal, CS
Joyce, G
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2005年 / 173卷 / 04期
关键词
prostate; costs and cost analysis; prostatic hyperplasia; insurance; major medical; economics; medical;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000152318.79184.6f
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Several studies document the impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in working, aged men. Direct medical costs related to BPH treatment are largely borne by employees through higher premiums. However, indirect costs related to lost work are primarily borne by the employer. In this study we used claims data and absentee records from large employers to estimate the costs associated with BPH in working age males. Materials and Methods: We used 2 data sources to examine direct and indirect costs associated with BPH in a privately insured, nonelderly population. Multivariate regression models were used to predict spending for persons with and without a medical claim for BPH, controlling for relevant covariates. Data on work loss were linked to medical claims to estimate work loss related to treatment for BPH. Results: Mean annual expenditures were $4,193 for men without a medical claim for BPH. In contrast, annual spending was $5,729 for men with a claim for BPH. Thus, the incremental cost associated with a diagnosis of BPH was $1,536 yearly. Overall the average employee with the condition missed 7.3 hours of work yearly related to BPH with approximately 10% reporting some work loss related to a health care encounter for BPH. Conclusions: Treatment of men with BPH places a significant burden on employees and their employers through direct medical costs as well as through lost work time. Direct and indirect costs to the private sector related to BPH treatment are estimated to be $3.9 billion.
引用
收藏
页码:1309 / 1313
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Economic modeling to assess the costs of treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Ansong, KS
    UROLOGY, 1996, 47 (01) : 152 - 152
  • [2] THE COSTS OF PROSTATECTOMY FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA
    WEIS, KA
    EPSTEIN, RS
    HUSE, DM
    DEVERKA, PA
    OSTER, G
    PROSTATE, 1993, 22 (04): : 325 - 334
  • [3] An evaluation of the economic costs and patient-related consequences of treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Disantostefano, Rachael L.
    Biddle, Andrea K.
    Lavelle, John P.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 97 (05) : 1007 - 1016
  • [4] The economic costs of urolithiasis in the private sector
    Saigal, CS
    Joyce, G
    Pace, J
    Litwin, MS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 33 - 34
  • [5] COMPARISON OF COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH TURP AND PROSTATIC URETHRAL LIFT FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA
    Orlowski, A.
    Kayes, O.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S268 - S268
  • [6] Economic evaluation of finasteride in benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment
    Nickel, JC
    McDonald, H
    Hux, M
    Brisson, M
    Bernard, L
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 35 - 36
  • [7] An economic evaluation of finasteride for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Baladi, JF
    Menon, D
    Otten, N
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1996, 9 (05) : 443 - 454
  • [8] ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE TREATMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA IN COLOMBIA
    Gomez, P.
    Plata, M.
    Carreno, A.
    Guzman, F.
    Jimenez, L. A.
    Calderon, C.
    Rosselli, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (03) : A79 - A79
  • [9] ECONOMIC-ISSUES AND THE MANAGEMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA
    HOLTGREWE, HL
    UROLOGY, 1995, 46 (3A) : 23 - 25
  • [10] HEALTHCARE COSTS FOR OFFICE BASED BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA THERAPIES
    Smith, Craig
    Pugach, Robert
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E333 - E333