Amniotic fluid embolism incidence, risk factors and outcomes: a review and recommendations

被引:95
|
作者
Knight, Marian [1 ]
Berg, Cynthia [2 ]
Brocklehurst, Peter [1 ]
Kramer, Michael [3 ,4 ]
Lewis, Gwyneth [1 ]
Oats, Jeremy [5 ]
Roberts, Christine L. [6 ]
Spong, Catherine [7 ]
Sullivan, Elizabeth [8 ]
van Roosmalen, Jos [9 ]
Zwart, Joost [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Natl Perinatal Epidemiol Unit, Oxford, England
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent CDC, Div Reprod Hlth, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Pediat, Fac Med, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Fac Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Consultat Council Obstet & Paediat Mortal & Morbi, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Sydney, Royal N Shore Hosp, Kolling Inst Med Res, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[7] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Pregnancy & Perinatol Branch, NIH, Rockville, MD USA
[8] Univ New S Wales, Perinatal & Reprod Epidemiol Res Unit, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet, Leiden, Netherlands
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
SEVERE MATERNAL MORBIDITY; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2393-12-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is a rare but severe complication of pregnancy. A recent systematic review highlighted apparent differences in the incidence, with studies estimating the incidence of AFE to be more than three times higher in North America than Europe. The aim of this study was to examine population-based regional or national data from five high-resource countries in order to investigate incidence, risk factors and outcomes of AFE and to investigate whether any variation identified could be ascribed to methodological differences between the studies. Methods: We reviewed available data sources on the incidence of AFE in Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the USA. Where information was available, the risk factors and outcomes of AFE were examined. Results: The reported incidence of AFE ranged from 1.9 cases per 100 000 maternities (UK) to 6.1 per 100 000 maternities (Australia). There was a clear distinction between rates estimated using different methodologies. The lowest estimated incidence rates were obtained through validated case identification (range 1.9-2.5 cases per 100 000 maternities); rates obtained from retrospective analysis of population discharge databases were significantly higher (range 5.5-6.1 per 100 000 admissions with delivery diagnosis). Older maternal age and induction of labour were consistently associated with AFE. Conclusions: Recommendation 1: Comparisons of AFE incidence estimates should be restricted to studies using similar methodology. The recommended approaches would be either population-based database studies using additional criteria to exclude false positive cases, or tailored data collection using existing specific population-based systems. Recommendation 2: Comparisons of AFE incidence between and within countries would be facilitated by development of an agreed case definition and an agreed set of criteria to minimise inclusion of false positive cases for database studies. Recommendation 3: Groups conducting detailed population-based studies on AFE should develop an agreed strategy to allow combined analysis of data obtained using consistent methodologies in order to identify potentially modifiable risk factors. Recommendation 4: Future specific studies on AFE should aim to collect information on management and longer-term outcomes for both mothers and infants in order to guide best practice, counselling and service planning.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Amniotic fluid embolism incidence, risk factors and outcomes: a review and recommendations
    Marian Knight
    Cynthia Berg
    Peter Brocklehurst
    Michael Kramer
    Gwyneth Lewis
    Jeremy Oats
    Christine L Roberts
    Catherine Spong
    Elizabeth Sullivan
    Jos van Roosmalen
    Joost Zwart
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 12
  • [2] Incidence, Risk Factors, and Consequences of Amniotic Fluid Embolism
    Kramer, Michael S.
    Abenhaim, Haim
    Dahhou, Mourad
    Rouleau, Jocelyn
    Berg, Cynthia
    PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 27 (05) : 436 - 441
  • [3] Incidence and Risk Factors for Amniotic-Fluid Embolism
    Knight, Marian
    Tuffnell, Derek
    Brocklehurst, Peter
    Spark, Patsy
    Kurinczuk, Jennifer J.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 115 (05): : 910 - 917
  • [4] Amniotic fluid embolism: incidence, risk factors, and impact on perinatal outcome
    Kramer, M. S.
    Rouleau, J.
    Liu, S.
    Bartholomew, S.
    Joseph, K. S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (07) : 874 - 879
  • [5] Incidence and Risk Factors for Amniotic-Fluid Embolism EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Knight, Marian
    Tuffnell, Derek
    Brocklehurst, Peter
    Spark, Patsy
    Kurinczuk, Jennifer J.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2010, 65 (09) : 547 - 548
  • [6] Amniotic fluid embolism-risk factors, maternal and neonatal outcomes
    Spiliopoulos, Michail
    Puri, Isha
    Jain, Neetu J.
    Kruse, Lakota
    Mastrogiannis, Dimitrios
    Dandolu, Vani
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2009, 22 (05): : 439 - 444
  • [7] Fatal amniotic fluid embolism: incidence, risk factors and influence on perinatal outcome
    Chengya Zhu
    Dong Xu
    Qiong Luo
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023, 307 : 1187 - 1194
  • [8] Fatal amniotic fluid embolism: incidence, risk factors and influence on perinatal outcome
    Zhu, Chengya
    Xu, Dong
    Luo, Qiong
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2023, 307 (04) : 1187 - 1194
  • [9] A retrospective analysis of the incidence and risk factors for amniotic fluid embolism in cesarean deliveries
    Xianghua Cao
    Qiangjun Gui
    Haoran Yan
    Yujiao Wei
    Xiaoling Chen
    Deng Liang
    Xueping Li
    Jian Wang
    Bingsha Chen
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 25 (1)
  • [10] What are the risk factors for amniotic fluid embolism
    Whalen, Phoebe
    Sharshiner, Rita
    Caughey, Aaron
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (01) : S266 - S266