Bear diets and human-bear conflicts: insights from isotopic ecology

被引:2
|
作者
Falconi, Nereyda [1 ,2 ]
Carlo, Tomas A. [3 ]
Fuller, Todd K. [1 ]
Destefano, Stephen [2 ]
Organ, John F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Environm Conservat, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Massachusetts Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit U, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Biol, State Coll, PA 16801 USA
[4] US Geol Survey, Cooperat Res Units Program, Reston, VA 20192 USA
关键词
bears; carnivory; Nitrogen-15; omnivory; stable isotopes; trophic position; Ursidae; AMERICAN BLACK BEARS; GRIZZLY BEARS; URSUS-ARCTOS; HABITS; NICHE;
D O I
10.1111/mam.12285
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Bears, Ursidae, are considered omnivores, except for giant pandas Ailuropoda melanoleuca and polar bears Ursus maritimus. However, omnivory includes a wide range of dietary variation and trophic positions, making bear dietary ecology unclear. We inferred bear trophic positions from delta N-15 (parts per thousand) values and examined their correlation with diets reported in the literature, including frequency of human-bear conflicts (livestock predation and crop damage incidents). Overall, N-15 signatures were consistent with diet estimates. Bear species with higher N-15 signatures differed more from each other, including cases of large regional intraspecific variance, than bear species with lower N-15 signatures. Bear trophic position and frequency of reports of human-bear conflicts were uncorrelated, suggesting that livestock predation by bears is an opportunistic behaviour rather than a response to food availability dynamics.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 327
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Human-bear conflicts in Slovenia
    不详
    HUMAN-WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS, 2019, 13 (02): : 184 - 185
  • [2] Structural and economic aspects of human-bear conflicts in Greece
    Karamanlidis, Alexandros A.
    Sanopoulos, Angelos
    Georgiadis, Lazaros
    Zedrosser, Andreas
    URSUS, 2011, 22 (02) : 141 - 151
  • [3] A gap in media communication of human-bear conflicts management
    Nanni, Veronica
    Mercugliano, Elena
    Soler, Sofia
    Biasetti, Pierfrancesco
    Mammola, Stefano
    Guadagnini, Roberto
    Manenti, Raoul
    De Mori, Barbara
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2024, 294
  • [4] Spatial tradeoffs between residents' preferences for brown bear conservation and the mitigation of human-bear conflicts
    Kubo, Takahiro
    Shoji, Yasushi
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 176 : 126 - 132
  • [5] Human-bear conflicts in Massanutten Village: achieving success requires partnerships
    Scott, Allison M.
    Kocka, David M.
    Mitchell, Glenn W., Jr.
    HUMAN-WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS, 2018, 12 (03): : 405 - 410
  • [6] Distribution of American black bear occurrences and human-bear incidents in Missouri
    Wilton, Clay M.
    Belant, Jerrold L.
    Beringer, Jeff
    URSUS, 2014, 25 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [7] Foraging ecology of black bears in urban environments: guidance for human-bear conflict mitigation
    Lewis, D. L.
    Baruch-Mordo, S.
    Wilson, K. R.
    Breck, S. W.
    Mao, J. S.
    Broderick, J.
    ECOSPHERE, 2015, 6 (08):
  • [8] From Conflict to Conviviality? Transforming Human-Bear Relations in Bulgaria
    Toncheva, Svetoslava
    Fletcher, Robert
    FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2021, 2
  • [9] Balancing human-bear coexistence with biodiversity conservation
    Su, Kaiwen
    Yang, Jie
    Lin, Lin
    Hou, Yilei
    Wen, Yali
    HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF WILDLIFE, 2023, 28 (02) : 155 - 169
  • [10] Is diversionary feeding an effective tool for reducing human-bear conflicts? Case studies from North America and Europe
    Garshelis, David L.
    Baruch-Mordo, Sharon
    Bryant, Ann
    Gunther, Kerry A.
    Jerina, Klemen
    URSUS, 2017, 28 (01) : 31 - 55