Correlation Coefficients for a Study with Repeated Measures

被引:30
|
作者
Shan, Guogen [1 ]
Zhang, Hua [2 ]
Jiang, Tao [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada Las Vegas, Sch Publ Hlth, Epidemiol & Biostat Program, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[2] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Comp & Informat Engn, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Stat & Math, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Business, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
CALCULATING CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS; ADAPTIVE 2-STAGE DESIGNS; EXACT CONFIDENCE-LIMITS;
D O I
10.1155/2020/7398324
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Repeated measures are increasingly collected in a study to investigate the trajectory of measures over time. One of the first research questions is to determine the correlation between two measures. The following five methods for correlation calculation are compared: (1) Pearson correlation; (2) correlation of subject means; (3) partial correlation for subject effect; (4) partial correlation for visit effect; and (5) a mixed model approach. Pearson correlation coefficient is traditionally used in a cross-sectional study. Pearson correlation is close to the correlations computed from mixed-effects models that consider the correlation structure, but Pearson correlation may not be theoretically appropriate in a repeated-measure study as it ignores the correlation of the outcomes from multiple visits within the same subject. We compare these methods with regard to the average of correlation and the mean squared error. In general, correlation under the mixed-effects model with the compound symmetric structure is recommended as its correlation is close to the nominal level with small mean square error.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条