Bio-gas augmentation and waste minimization by co-digestion process in anaerobic digestion system of a municipal waste water treatment plant

被引:9
|
作者
Sanaye, Sepehr [1 ]
Mohammadi, Mohammad Hadi [1 ]
Yazdani, Mohsen [1 ]
Rashvanlou, Reza Barati [2 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Sci & Technol IUST, Sch Mech Engn, Energy Syst Improvement Lab ESIL, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Municipal wastewater treatment plant; Anaerobic digestion system; Co -digestion model; Process stability; METHANE POTENTIAL BMP; MODEL NO. 1; FOOD WASTE; SOLID-WASTE; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; AUTOMATIC-CONTROL; ENERGY RETROFIT; PIG MANURE; SLUDGE; ADM1;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115989
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Anaerobic digesters of Tehran waste water treatment plant (WWTP) working in mono-digestion operation are investigated for not only methane augmentation but also for waste minimization by the use of co-digestion process. Three types of co-substrate wastes including slaughterhouse flotation greases, biowaste, and cattle manure were selected because they were available in large amounts. A model was required to predict the volume flow rates of feeding co-substrate wastes into digesters during operation time for providing sufficient biogas in order to generate maximum gas engine power output. Thus, Anaerobic Digestion Model Number 1 (ADM1) for mono-substrate is modified so that it could be used with characterization of primary sludge, secondary sludge, and several co-substrate waste inputs into digesters. Then, appropriate coefficients (hydrolysis coefficient and bio-degradability factor) in this model were determined by the use of sludge biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests. After complete modification, calibration and validation of ADM1 method with experimental values of primary and secondary sludge for anaerobic digestion (which is the current reality in Tehran WWTP), the developed model is integrated with a co-substrate feeding strategy for estimation of required feed flow rates of co-substrate wastes. Results indicated that feeding grease, biowaste and manure increased the average generated biogas from 10524 m(3)/day (62.1% CH4) to 29161 m(3)/day (61.5% CH4), 30183 m(3)/day (59.5% CH4), and 32531 m(3)/day (53.8% CH4), respectively. Also, the gas engine power output increased from an average value of 906 kW to about 2.5 MW (during the studied operation time period). Low hydrolysis coefficient and low degradability of manure caused high bio-degradable feed flow rate of this co-substrate waste to about 58,200 kgCOD(b)/day in average. This value for biowaste and grease was 38,800 and 36,100 kgCOD(b)/day, respectively. Feeding grease and biowaste into digesters increased COD removal efficiency from 37% to 58% and 54%, respectively, while feeding manure dropped it to 31%. Furthermore, values of pH and VFA/Alk indicators showed stable conditions in digesters. Moreover, it was found that all three co-digestion processes did not impose a new load on other WWTP equipment for reducing nitrogen in the effluent stream of WWTP. Finally, it was concluded that biowaste is an appropriate co-substrate for our case study.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An overview of bio augmentation of methane by anaerobic co-digestion of municipal sludge along with microalgae and waste paper
    Ajeej, Amritha
    Thanikal, Joseph V.
    Narayanan, C. M.
    Kumar, R. Senthil
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 50 : 270 - 276
  • [2] Experimental study of co-digestion of food waste and tall fescue for bio-gas production
    Chen, Guanyi
    Liu, Gang
    Yan, Beibei
    Shan, Rui
    Wang, Jianan
    Li, Ting
    Xu, Weiwei
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 88 : 273 - 279
  • [3] Effect of fish waste augmentation on anaerobic co-digestion of sludge with food waste
    Chairattanawat, Chayanee
    Yulisa, Arma
    Hwang, Seokhwan
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 361
  • [4] Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste and agricultural waste and the effect of co-digestion with dairy cow manure
    Macias-Corral, Maritza
    Samani, Zohrab
    Hanson, Adrian
    Smith, Geoffrey
    Funk, Paul
    Yu, Hui
    Longworth, John
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 99 (17) : 8288 - 8293
  • [5] Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and microalgae in an integrated treatment plant
    Ferreira, Luisa Ornelas
    Astals, Sergi
    Passos, Fabiana
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 97 (06) : 1545 - 1554
  • [6] Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Water Hyacinth and Sheep Waste
    Patil, Jagadish H.
    AntonyRaj, M. A. L.
    Shankar, B. B.
    Shetty, Mahesh Kumar
    Kumar, B. P. Pradeep
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND EMERGING ECONOMIES (2013 AEDCEE), 2014, 52 : 572 - 578
  • [7] Anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Influence of co-digestion with manure
    Hartmann, H
    Ahring, BK
    WATER RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (08) : 1543 - 1552
  • [8] Energy recovery from food waste and garden and park waste: Anaerobic co-digestion versus hydrothermal treatment and anaerobic co-digestion
    Suarez, Eneko
    Tobajas, Montserrat
    Mohedano, Angel F.
    Angeles de la Rubia, M.
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2022, 297
  • [9] Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal organic solid waste: Achievements and perspective
    Pramanik, Sagor Kumar
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2022, 20
  • [10] Optimization of the Proportions of Kitchen Waste and Municipal Sludge in Anaerobic Co-Digestion
    Zhen, Xiaofei
    Li, Jinping
    Feng, Lei
    Gao, Tianyu
    Osman, Yassir Idris Abdalla
    Zhang, Xuemin
    JOURNAL OF BIOBASED MATERIALS AND BIOENERGY, 2019, 13 (01) : 155 - 160