Educational effects on ascertain dementia 8-item informant questionnaire to detect dementia in the Taiwanese population

被引:7
|
作者
Chen, Sz-Fan [1 ]
Liu, Ming-Hsiung [2 ]
Chen, Nai-Ching [1 ]
Horng, Horng-Dean [3 ]
Tsao, Wen-Lung [3 ]
Chang, Chiung-Chih [1 ]
Chang, Ya-Ting [1 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Neurol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi Hosp, Dept Neurol, Dalin Tzu Chi Dementia Ctr, Chiayi, Taiwan
关键词
CASI; dementia; memory; MMSE; screening; MINI-MENTAL-STATE; COGNITIVE-ABILITIES; AD8; INTERVIEW; PREVALENCE; VERSION; RELIABILITY; ILLITERATE; VALIDITY; SUBTYPES;
D O I
10.1017/S1041610217002733
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background:Dementia screening is a public health priority in Taiwan, where the prevalence of dementia is increasing because of an aging population. However, the reasons affect community-dwelling people to accept a referral to memory specialist clinic after dementia screening was still unclear. To investigate the feasibility, acceptability, sensitivity, and specificity of the ascertain dementia 8-item informant questionnaire (AD8) to screen for patients with cognitive impairments in Taiwan's primary healthcare system.Methods:Researchers invited community-dwelling people whose age was above 50-year-old to attend the Memory Screening Project. AD8 was used to perform the informant interview with adult patients who were attending the Memory Screening Project in Taiwan. Individuals who scored 2 on the AD8 was suggested to accept referral for further cognitive performance evaluation tests, which included three validated dementia tests, i.e. the Mini-Mental Screening Examination (MMSE), the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI), and the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR).Results:Of the 102 participants who scored 2 on the AD8, only 25.5% attended the referral appointment. In participants who had achieved six or more years of education, AD8 scores were not significantly different between groups and could not differentiate between the non-dementia and patients with dementia in the receiver-operator characteristics curve analysis. In contrast, in those participants who had received less than six years of education, the AD8 scores significantly differentiated between non-dementia and patients with dementia (p = 0.03).Conclusions:There was a low rate of attendance at a specialist memory clinic following referral after the AD8 interview. Higher levels of education facilitated individuals to make a decision to accept the recommended referral appointment, while the AD8 showed a higher rate of differentiation between individuals who had received an education of less than six years.
引用
收藏
页码:1189 / 1197
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of Ascertain Dementia 8-item Questionnaire by participant and informant-A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tanwani, Rajiv
    Danquah, Mercy O.
    Butris, Nina
    Saripella, Aparna
    Yan, Ellene
    Kapoor, Paras
    Englesakis, Marina
    Tang-Wai, David F.
    Tartaglia, Maria Carmela
    He, David
    Chung, Frances
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (09):
  • [2] Item-level psychometrics of the Ascertain Dementia Eight-Item Informant Questionnaire
    Ham, Yeajin
    Bae, Suyeong
    Lee, Heerim
    Ha, Yaena
    Choi, Heesu
    Park, Ji-Hyuk F.
    Park, Hae Yean F.
    Hong, Ickpyo F.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (07):
  • [3] The relationship of cognitive change over time to the self-reported Ascertain Dementia 8-item Questionnaire in a general population
    Passler, Jesse S.
    Kennedy, Richard E.
    Crowe, Michael
    Clay, Olivio J.
    Howard, Virginia J.
    Cushman, Mary
    Unverzagt, Frederick W.
    Wadley, Virginia G.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 36 (02) : 243 - 252
  • [4] Validity and reliability of the Farsi version of the ascertain dementia 8-item (AD8-F) informant interview in Iranian patients with mild neurocognitive disorder
    Maryam Pourshams
    James E. Galvin
    Pouya Farokhnezhad Afshar
    Pamela Gail Santos
    Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi
    Leila Kamalzadeh
    Behnam Shariati
    Seyed Kazem Malakouti
    BMC Geriatrics, 22
  • [5] Validity and reliability of the Farsi version of the ascertain dementia 8-item (AD8-F) informant interview in Iranian patients with mild neurocognitive disorder
    Pourshams, Maryam
    Galvin, James E.
    Afshar, Pouya Farokhnezhad
    Santos, Pamela Gail
    Bazargan-Hejazi, Shahrzad
    Kamalzadeh, Leila
    Shariati, Behnam
    Malakouti, Seyed Kazem
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [6] The AD8 - A brief informant interview to detect dementia
    Galvin, JE
    Roe, CM
    Powlishta, KK
    Coats, MA
    Muich, SJ
    Grant, E
    Miller, JP
    Storandt, M
    Morris, JC
    NEUROLOGY, 2005, 65 (04) : 559 - 564
  • [7] The AD8: A brief informant interview to detect dementia
    Galvin, JE
    Roe, CM
    Powlishta, KK
    Coats, MA
    Muich, SJ
    Grant, E
    Miller, JP
    Storandt, M
    Morris, JC
    NEUROLOGY, 2004, 62 (07) : A235 - A236
  • [8] Agreement on dementia severity levels between the 8-item and 21-item Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-based Integrated Care System
    Mitsutake, Seigo
    Ishizaki, Tatsuro
    Furuta, Ko
    Hatakeyama, Akira
    Sugiyama, Mika
    Awata, Shuichi
    Toba, Kenji
    Ito, Hideki
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 21 (08) : 748 - 749
  • [9] Application of AD8 Questionnaire to Screen Very Mild Dementia in Taiwanese
    Yang, Yuan-Han
    Galvin, James E.
    Morris, John C.
    Lai, Chiou-Lian
    Chou, Mei-Chuan
    Liu, Ching-Kuan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND OTHER DEMENTIAS, 2011, 26 (02): : 134 - 138
  • [10] Augmented (8-item) Clinical Dementia Rating Scale is an effective instrument for longitudinal studies of bvFTD and PPA
    Knopman, David
    Weintraub, Sandra
    Pankratz, V. Shane
    DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2012, 33 : 268 - 268