Projections of cold air outbreaks in CMIP6 earth system models

被引:5
|
作者
Smith, Erik T. [1 ]
Sheridan, Scott C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kent State Univ, Dept Geog, Kent, OH 44242 USA
关键词
Cold air outbreaks; Extreme cold events; Climate modeling; ERA5; CMIP6; Shared socioeconomic pathways; CLIMATE MODEL; FUTURE; TEMPERATURE; SCENARIOMIP; FREQUENCY; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-021-03259-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Historical and future simulated temperature data from five climate models in the Coupled Model Intercomparing Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) are used to understand how climate change might alter cold air outbreaks (CAOs) in the future. Three different shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs), SSP126, SSP245, and SSP585, are examined to identify potential fluctuations in CAOs across the globe between 2015 and 2054. Though CAOs may remain persistent or even increase in some regions through 2040, all five climate models show CAOs disappearing by 2054 based on current climate percentiles. Climate models were able to accurately simulate the spatial distribution and trends of historical CAOs, but there were large errors in the simulated interannual frequency of CAOs in the North Atlantic and North Pacific. Fluctuations in complex processes, such as Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, may be contributing to each model's inability to simulate historical CAOs in these regions. Plain language summary Cold air outbreaks (CAOs) are extreme events that can have large, negative impacts on society. Because of these impacts, it is important to understand how climate change might alter CAOs in the future. Three future scenarios from five different climate models are examined to see where CAOs might change the most between 2015 and 2054. While changes in CAOs may be small for some regions through 2040, all the climate models show CAOs disappearing, relative to the historically defined criteria, by 2054. Where the climate models did a good job simulating historical CAOs, like in North America, we have confidence that future projections are relatively accurate. Where the models did poorly at simulating historical CAOs, like the North Atlantic and North Pacific, we have less confidence in future projections. More work needs to be done to understand the complex processes that lead to these errors.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Projections of cold air outbreaks in CMIP6 earth system models
    Erik T. Smith
    Scott C. Sheridan
    Climatic Change, 2021, 169
  • [2] Implementation of UK Earth System Models for CMIP6
    Sellar, Alistair A.
    Walton, Jeremy
    Jones, Colin G.
    Wood, Richard
    Abraham, Nathan Luke
    Andrejczuk, Miroslaw
    Andrews, Martin B.
    Andrews, Timothy
    Archibald, Alex T.
    de Mora, Lee
    Dyson, Harold
    Elkington, Mark
    Ellis, Richard
    Florek, Piotr
    Good, Peter
    Gohar, Laila
    Haddad, Stephen
    Hardiman, Steven C.
    Hogan, Emma
    Iwi, Alan
    Jones, Christopher D.
    Johnson, Ben
    Kelley, Douglas, I
    Kettleborough, Jamie
    Knight, Jeff R.
    Kohler, Marcus O.
    Kuhlbrodt, Till
    Liddicoat, Spencer
    Linova-Pavlova, Irina
    Mizielinski, Matthew S.
    Morgenstern, Olaf
    Mulcahy, Jane
    Neininger, Erica
    O'Connor, Fiona M.
    Petrie, Ruth
    Ridley, Jeff
    Rioual, Jean-Christophe
    Roberts, Malcolm
    Robertson, Eddy
    Rumbold, Steven
    Seddon, Jon
    Shepherd, Harry
    Shim, Sungbo
    Stephens, Ag
    Teixiera, Joao C.
    Tang, Yongming
    Williams, Jonny
    Wiltshire, Andy
    Griffiths, Paul T.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [3] Crossbreeding CMIP6 Earth System Models With an Emulator for Regionally Optimized Land Temperature Projections
    Beusch, Lea
    Gudmundsson, Lukas
    Seneviratne, Sonia I.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (15)
  • [4] Assessment and Constraint of Mesozooplankton in CMIP6 Earth System Models
    Petrik, C. M.
    Luo, J. Y.
    Heneghan, R. F.
    Everett, J. D.
    Harrison, C. S.
    Richardson, A. J.
    GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2022, 36 (11)
  • [5] Validation of terrestrial biogeochemistry in CMIP6 Earth system models: a review
    Spafford, Lynsay
    MacDougall, Andrew H.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 14 (09) : 5863 - 5889
  • [6] Evaluation of global fire simulations in CMIP6 Earth system models
    Li, Fang
    Song, Xiang
    Harrison, Sandy P.
    Marlon, Jennifer R.
    Lin, Zhongda
    Leung, L. Ruby
    Schwinger, Jorg
    Marecal, Virginie
    Wang, Shiyu
    Ward, Daniel S.
    Dong, Xiao
    Lee, Hanna
    Nieradzik, Lars
    Rabin, Sam S.
    Seferian, Roland
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 17 (23) : 8751 - 8771
  • [7] Evaluation of soil carbon simulation in CMIP6 Earth system models
    Varney, Rebecca M.
    Chadburn, Sarah E.
    Burke, Eleanor J.
    Cox, Peter M.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2022, 19 (19) : 4671 - 4704
  • [8] Projections of precipitation over China based on CMIP6 models
    Jiaxi Tian
    Zengxin Zhang
    Zeeshan Ahmed
    Leying Zhang
    Buda Su
    Hui Tao
    Tong Jiang
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2021, 35 : 831 - 848
  • [9] Projections of precipitation over China based on CMIP6 models
    Tian, Jiaxi
    Zhang, Zengxin
    Ahmed, Zeeshan
    Zhang, Leying
    Su, Buda
    Tao, Hui
    Jiang, Tong
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2021, 35 (04) : 831 - 848
  • [10] Understanding Surface Air Temperature Cold Bias Over China in CMIP6 Models
    Wang, Liquan
    Liu, Zhaochen
    Lang, Xianmei
    Jiang, Dabang
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2023, 128 (19)