CRT Pacing: Midterm Follow-Up in LV Only Pacing without RV Lead in Patients with Normal AV Conduction

被引:9
|
作者
Cozma, Dragos [1 ,2 ]
Vacarescu, Cristina [1 ,2 ]
Petrescu, Lucian [1 ,2 ]
Mornos, Cristian [1 ,2 ]
Goanta, Emilia [2 ]
Feier, Horea [1 ,2 ]
Luca, Constantin Tudor [1 ,2 ]
Gusetu, Gabriel [3 ,4 ]
Vatasescu, Radu [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Farm Timisoara, Timisoara 300310, Romania
[2] Inst Cardiovasc Dis, Timisoara 300310, Romania
[3] Univ Med & Pharm Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj Napoca 400347, Romania
[4] Clin Rehabil Hosp, Cardiol Dept, Cluj Napoca 400347, Romania
[5] Univ Med & Pharm Carol Davila, Bucharest 014451, Romania
[6] Clin Emergency Hosp, Bucharest 014451, Romania
关键词
cardiac resynchronization therapy; right atrium/left ventricular pacing; normal atrioventricular conduction; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; HEART-FAILURE PATIENTS; BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK; PRIMARY PREVENTION; DEFIBRILLATOR; OPTIMIZATION; BACKUP; DEATH;
D O I
10.3390/jcm7120531
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of our study was to assess the real life cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) fusion left ventricular (LV) only pacing in patients with normal AV conduction (NAVc) without right ventricular (RV) lead. Methods: Consecutive NAVc patients with CRT indication were implanted with a right atrium RA/LV DDD pacing system. Complete follow-up at 1, 3 and every 6 months thereafter included echocardiography and stress testing. Results: We analysed 55 patients (62 +/- 11 years). All patients were responders with significant LV reverse remodelling (LV end-diastolic volume 193.7 +/- 81 vs. 243.2 +/- 82 mL at baseline, p < 0.002) and increased LV ejection fraction (38 +/- 7.9% vs. 27 +/- 5.2% at baseline, p < 0.001). Mitral regurgitation decreased in 38 patients (69%). During follow-up (35 +/- 18 months), 20 patients (36%) needed reprogramming sensed/paced AV delay or maximum tracking rate (MTR) because of inadequate or lost LV capture at exercise test; personalized programming to achieve up to 100% fusion pacing was used in all patients. One patient developed Mobitz II second degree AV block and triple chamber CRT-P upgrade was performed; defibrillator upgrade was not necessary. Conclusions: LV only pacing CRT-P without RV lead showed a positive outcome in carefully selected patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does CRT require RV pacing in patients with LBBB and normal AV conduction?
    Van Wessel, H.
    Meine, M.
    Wittkampf, F. H. M.
    De Jonge, N.
    Van Driel, V. J. H. M.
    Tuinenburg, A. E.
    Eykhout, A. C.
    Hauer, R. N. W.
    Doevendans, P. A.
    Loh, P.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 : 636 - 637
  • [2] LV only fusion pacing CRT without RV lead: clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of super-response
    Vacarescu, C.
    Petrescu, L.
    Luca, C. T.
    Mornos, C.
    Goanta, E. V.
    Crisan, S.
    Cozma, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2019, 21 : 373 - 373
  • [3] Double chamber CRT pacing using only right atrium/left ventricle leads in patients without ischemic etiology and normal AV conduction
    Vacarescu, C.
    Petrescu, L.
    Goanta, E. V.
    Cozma, D.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 : 1172 - 1173
  • [4] AV delay optimisation in LV only CRT: constant fusion pacing is easier in patients with first degree AV block
    Vacarescu, C.
    Luca, C. T.
    Petrescu, L.
    Ionac, A.
    Mornos, C.
    Goanta, E., V
    Crisan, S.
    Lazar, M. A.
    Cozma, D.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 : 810 - 810
  • [5] Exercise test is essential in LV-only fusion CRT pacing without right ventricle lead
    Vacarescu, Cristina
    Cozma, Dragos
    Petrescu, Lucian
    Dragan, Simona
    Mornos, Cristian
    Crisan, Simina
    Feier, Horea
    Lazar, Mihai-Andrei
    Cozlac, Ramona Alina
    Luca, Constantin Tudor
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2019, 14 : 969 - 975
  • [6] Pacing from a Novel Quadripolar LV Lead Improves LV Synchrony in CRT Patients
    Tomassoni, Gery F.
    Muir, Melody
    O'Brien, Erin
    Ryu, Kyungmoo
    Hesselson, Aaron
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2011, 17 (08) : S9 - S9
  • [7] How do patients with previous RV pacing respond to upgrading to CRT? Important messages for pacemaker and ICD follow-up
    Linde, Cecilia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2014, 16 (11) : 1157 - 1159
  • [8] Acute hemodynamic comparison of biventricular, LV only and multipoint pacing in CRT patients
    Zanon, F.
    Baracca, E.
    Pastore, G.
    Marcantoni, L.
    Lanza, D.
    Picariello, C.
    Aggio, S.
    Roncon, L.
    Noventa, F.
    Prinzen, F. W.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 : 840 - 840
  • [9] LV Pacing is Superior to RV Pacing in Children with Structurally Normal Hearts and AV Block: Preliminary Results of a Multi-Center Study
    van Geldorp, Irene E.
    Janousek, Jan
    Gebauer, Roman
    Vanagt, Ward
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    Delhaas, Tammo
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2010, 72 (03) : 264 - 264
  • [10] Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in chronic right ventricular apical pacing: a midterm follow-up study
    Erdal Safak
    Hüseyin Ince
    Lito Gkouvatsou
    Heinz-Peter Schultheiss
    Jasmin Ortak
    Evren Caglayan
    Alper Oener
    Giuseppe D’Ancona
    European Journal of Medical Research, 24