Uncertainty analysis of fluvial outcrop data for stochastic reservoir modelling

被引:16
|
作者
Martinius, AW
Næss, A
机构
[1] Statoil Res Ctr, N-7005 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Statoil Explorat & Prod, N-7501 Stjordal, Norway
关键词
uncertainty analysis; fluvial sedimentology; stochastic reservoir modelling;
D O I
10.1144/1354-079303-615
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Uncertainty analysis and reduction is a crucial part of stochastic reservoir modelling and fluid flow simulation studies. Outcrop analogue studies are often employed to define reservoir model parameters but the analysis of uncertainties associated with sedimentological information is often neglected. In order to define uncertainty inherent in outcrop data more accurately, this paper presents geometrical and dimensional data from individual point bars and braid bars, from part of the low net:gross outcropping Tortola fluvial system (Spain) that has been subjected to a quantitative and qualitative assessment. Four types of primary outcrop uncertainties are discussed: (1) the definition of the conceptual depositional model; (2) the number of observations on sandstone body dimensions; (3) the accuracy and representativeness of observed three-dimensional (3D) sandstone body size data; and (4) sandstone body orientation. Uncertainties related to the depositional model are the most difficult to quantify but can be appreciated qualitatively if processes of deposition related to scales of time and the general lack of information are considered. Application of the N(0) measure is suggested to assess quantitatively whether a statistically sufficient number of dimensional observations is obtained to reduce uncertainty to an acceptable level. The third type of uncertainty is evaluated in a qualitative sense and determined by accurate facies analysis. The orientation of sandstone bodies is shown to influence spatial connectivity. As a result, an insufficient number or quality of observations may have important consequences for estimated connected volumes. This study will give improved estimations for reservoir modelling.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 214
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stochastic modelling of a fluvial reservoir: a comparative review of algorithms
    Journel, AG
    Gundeso, R
    Gringarten, E
    Yao, T
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 1998, 21 (1-2) : 95 - 121
  • [2] Stochastic modelling of a fluvial reservoir: a comparative review of algorithms
    Geol. and Environ. Sci. Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
    不详
    不详
    J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 1-2 (95-121):
  • [3] RESERVOIR HETEROGENEITIES IN FLUVIAL SANDSTONES - LESSONS FROM OUTCROP STUDIES
    MIALL, AD
    AAPG BULLETIN-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGISTS, 1988, 72 (06): : 682 - 697
  • [4] RESERVOIR HETEROGENEITIES IN FLUVIAL SANDSTONES: LESSON FROM OUTCROP STUDIES.
    Miall, Andrew D.
    American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 1988, 72 (06): : 682 - 697
  • [5] Modelling uncertainty in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis
    Durbach, Ian N.
    Calder, Jon M.
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2016, 64 : 13 - 23
  • [6] Quantification of uncertainty modelling in stochastic analysis of FRP composites
    Sriramula, Srinivas
    Chryssanthopoulos, Marios K.
    COMPOSITES PART A-APPLIED SCIENCE AND MANUFACTURING, 2009, 40 (11) : 1673 - 1684
  • [7] Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis on water quality modelling of Aguamilpa reservoir
    Rangel-Peraza, Jesus G.
    De Anda, Jose
    Gonzalez-Farias, Fernando A.
    Rode, Michael
    JOURNAL OF LIMNOLOGY, 2016, 75 : 81 - 92
  • [8] Modelling a fluvial reservoir with multipoint statistics and principal components
    Wong, PM
    Shibli, SAR
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2001, 31 (2-4) : 157 - 163
  • [9] Controlling the uncertainty in reservoir stochastic simulation
    Cui Yong 1
    Petroleum Science, 2010, (04) : 472 - 476
  • [10] Controlling the uncertainty in reservoir stochastic simulation
    Cui Yong Chi Bo Chen Guo Ouyang Cheng and Xia Bairu China University of Geosciences Beijing China Research Institute of Daqing Oilfield Company Ltd Heilongjiang China Geological Exploration Development Research Institute PetroChina Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company Chengdu Sichuan China
    Petroleum Science, 2010, 7 (04) : 472 - 476