Effects of Pulse Shape and Polarity on Sensitivity to Cochlear Implant Stimulation: A Chronic Study in Guinea Pigs

被引:15
|
作者
Macherey, Olivier [1 ]
Cazals, Yves [2 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, Cent Marseille, CNRS, LMA,UPR 7051, 4 Impasse Nikola Tesla, F-13013 Marseille, France
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LNIA, UMR 7260, 3 Pl Victor Hugo, F-13331 Marseille, France
关键词
Inferior colliculus; Electrical stimulation; Asymmetric pulses; Auditory nerve; MONOPHASIC STIMULATION; ACTION-POTENTIALS; NERVE; RESPONSES; MONOPOLAR; MODEL; CAT;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_15
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Most cochlear implants (CIs) stimulate the auditory nerve with trains of symmetric biphasic pulses consisting of two phases of opposite polarity. Animal and human studies have shown that both polarities can elicit neural responses. In human CI listeners, studies have shown that at suprathreshold levels, the anodic phase is more effective than the cathodic phase. In contrast, animal studies usually show the opposite trend. Although the reason for this discrepancy remains unclear, computational modelling results have proposed that the degeneration of the peripheral processes of the neurons could lead to a higher efficiency of anodic stimulation. We tested this hypothesis in ten guinea pigs who were deafened with an injection of sysomycin and implanted with a single ball electrode inserted in the first turn of the cochlea. Animals were tested at regular intervals between 1 week after deafening and up to 1 year for some of them. Our hypothesis was that if the effect of polarity is determined by the presence or absence of peripheral processes, the difference in polarity efficiency should change over time because of a progressive neural degeneration. Stimuli consisted of charge-balanced symmetric and asymmetric pulses allowing us to observe the response to each polarity individually. For all stimuli, the inferior colliculus evoked potential was measured. Results show that the cathodic phase was more effective than the anodic phase and that this remained so even several months after deafening. This suggests that neural degeneration cannot entirely account for the higher efficiency of anodic stimulation observed in human CI listeners.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 142
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Polarity Sensitivity of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers Based on Pulse Shape, Cochlear Implant Stimulation Strategy and Array
    Heshmat, Amirreza
    Sajedi, Sogand
    Schrott-Fischer, Anneliese
    Rattay, Frank
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [2] Effects of pulse shape on pitch sensitivity of cochlear implant users
    Arslan, Niyazi O.
    Luo, Xin
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2024, 450
  • [3] Effect of Pulse Rate and Polarity on the Sensitivity of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implant Users to Electrical Stimulation
    Robert P. Carlyon
    John M. Deeks
    Colette M. McKay
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2015, 16 : 653 - 668
  • [4] Effect of Pulse Rate and Polarity on the Sensitivity of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implant Users to Electrical Stimulation
    Carlyon, Robert P.
    Deeks, John M.
    McKay, Colette M.
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 16 (05): : 653 - 668
  • [5] Sensitivity to pulse phase duration in cochlear implant listeners: Effects of stimulation mode
    Chatterjee, Monita
    Kulkarni, Aditya M.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2014, 136 (02): : 829 - 840
  • [6] Asymmetric pulses in cochlear implants: Effects of pulse shape, polarity, and rate
    Macherey, Olivier
    Van Wieringen, Astrid
    Carlyon, Robert P.
    Decks, John M.
    Wouters, Jan
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2006, 7 (03): : 253 - 266
  • [7] Asymmetric Pulses in Cochlear Implants: Effects of Pulse Shape, Polarity, and Rate
    Olivier Macherey
    Astrid van Wieringen
    Robert P. Carlyon
    John M. Deeks
    Jan Wouters
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2006, 7 : 253 - 266
  • [8] The relation between polarity sensitivity and neural degeneration in a computational model of cochlear implant stimulation
    Kalkman, Randy K.
    Briaire, Jeroen J.
    Dekker, David M. T.
    Frijns, Johan H. M.
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2022, 415
  • [9] Polarity Sensitivity in Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners
    Jahn, Kelly N.
    Arenberg, Julie G.
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2019, 23
  • [10] EFFECTS OF STIMULATION BY COCHLEAR IMPLANT ON THE COCHLEAR NERVE
    TERR, LI
    SFOGLIANO, GA
    RILEY, SL
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1989, 99 (11): : 1171 - 1174