An external validation study of the Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP), an interpretable machine learning-based triage score for the emergency department

被引:6
|
作者
Yu, Jae Yong [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Feng [3 ]
Nan, Liu [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Yoon, Sunyoung [1 ]
Ong, Marcus Eng Hock [3 ,6 ]
Ng, Yih Yng [2 ,7 ]
Cha, Won Chul [1 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Adv Inst Hlth Sci & Technol SAIHST, Dept Digital Hlth, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Digital & Smart Hlth Off, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Duke Natl Univ, Singapore Med Sch, Programme Hlth Serv & Syst Res, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Singapore Hlth Serv, Hlth Serv Res Ctr, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Inst Data Sci, Singapore, Singapore
[6] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Singapore, Singapore
[8] Samsung Med Ctr, Digital Innovat Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[9] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, 115 Irwon Ro, Seoul 06355, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41598-022-22233-w
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Emergency departments (EDs) are experiencing complex demands. An ED triage tool, the Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP), was previously developed using an interpretable machine learning framework. It achieved a good performance in the Singapore population. We aimed to externally validate the SERP in a Korean cohort for all ED patients and compare its performance with Korean triage acuity scale (KTAS). This retrospective cohort study included all adult ED patients of Samsung Medical Center from 2016 to 2020. The outcomes were 30-day and in-hospital mortality after the patients' ED visit. We used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) to assess the performance of the SERP and other conventional scores, including KTAS. The study population included 285,523 ED visits, of which 53,541 were after the COVID-19 outbreak (2020). The whole cohort, in-hospital, and 30 days mortality rates were 1.60%, and 3.80%. The SERP achieved an AUROC of 0.821 and 0.803, outperforming KTAS of 0.679 and 0.729 for in-hospital and 30-day mortality, respectively. SERP was superior to other scores for in-hospital and 30-day mortality prediction in an external validation cohort. SERP is a generic, intuitive, and effective triage tool to stratify general patients who present to the emergency department.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An external validation study of the Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP), an interpretable machine learning-based triage score for the emergency department
    Jae Yong Yu
    Feng Xie
    Liu Nan
    Sunyoung Yoon
    Marcus Eng Hock Ong
    Yih Yng Ng
    Won Chul Cha
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [2] Inter hospital external validation of interpretable machine learning based triage score for the emergency department using common data model
    Yu, Jae Yong
    Kim, Doyeop
    Yoon, Sunyoung
    Kim, Taerim
    Heo, Sejin
    Chang, Hansol
    Han, Gab Soo
    Jeong, Kyung Won
    Park, Rae Woong
    Gwon, Jun Myung
    Xie, Feng
    Ong, Marcus Eng Hock
    Ng, Yih Yng
    Joo, Hyung Joon
    Cha, Won Chul
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [3] Inter hospital external validation of interpretable machine learning based triage score for the emergency department using common data model
    Jae Yong Yu
    Doyeop Kim
    Sunyoung Yoon
    Taerim Kim
    SeJin Heo
    Hansol Chang
    Gab Soo Han
    Kyung Won Jeong
    Rae Woong Park
    Jun Myung Gwon
    Feng Xie
    Marcus Eng Hock Ong
    Yih Yng Ng
    Hyung Joon Joo
    Won Chul Cha
    Scientific Reports, 14
  • [4] To score or not to score during triage in the emergency department?
    Melot, Christian
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 41 (06) : 1135 - 1137
  • [5] To score or not to score during triage in the emergency department?
    Christian Mélot
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2015, 41 : 1135 - 1137
  • [6] Using emergency department triage for machine learning-based admission and mortality prediction
    Tschoellitsch, Thomas
    Seidl, Philipp
    Bock, Carl
    Maletzky, Alexander
    Moser, Philipp
    Thumfart, Stefan
    Giretzlehner, Michael
    Hochreiter, Sepp
    Meier, Jens
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 30 (06) : 408 - 416
  • [7] Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes for Children During Emergency Department Triage
    Goto, Tadahiro
    Camargo, Carlos A., Jr.
    Faridi, Mohammad Kamal
    Freishtat, Robert J.
    Hasegawa, Kohei
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (01)
  • [8] Identifying a Clinical Risk Triage Score for Adult Emergency Department
    Zhu, Aiqun
    Liu, Xiao
    Zhang, Jingping
    CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (08) : 1135 - 1143
  • [9] Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Korean Triage and Acuity Scale Level in Emergency Department Patients
    Choi, Sae Won
    Ko, Taehoon
    Hong, Ki Jeong
    Kim, Kyung Hwan
    HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS RESEARCH, 2019, 25 (04) : 305 - 312
  • [10] EXTERNAL VALIDATION OF THE QSOFA SCORE IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS WITH PNEUMONIA
    George, Naomi
    Elie-Turenne, Marie-Carmelle
    Seethala, Raghu R.
    Baslanti, Tezcan Ozrazgat
    Bozorgmehri, Shahab
    Mark, Kemba
    Meurer, David
    Bihorac, Azra
    Aisiku, Imoigele P.
    Hou, Peter C.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 57 (06): : 755 - 764