Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRT) of the breast is known to reveal breast cancer with higher sensitivity than mammography alone. The specificity is, however, compromised by the observation that several benign masses take up contrast agent in addition to malignant lesions. The aim of this study is to increase the objectivity of breast cancer diagnosis in contrast-enhanced MRI by developing automated methods for computer-aided diagnosis. Our database consists of 27 MR studies from 27 patients. In each study, at least four MR series of bath breasts are obtained using FLASH three-dimensional (3D) acquisition at 90 s time intervals after injection of Gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) contrast agent. Each series consists of 64 coronal slices with a typical thickness of 2 mm, and a pixel size of 1.25 mm. The study contains 13 benign and 15 malignant lesions from which features are automatically extracted in 3D. These features include margin descriptors and radial gradient analysis as a function of time and space. Stepwise multiple regression is employed to obtain an effective subset of combined features. A final estimate of likelihood of malignancy is determined by linear discriminant analysis, and the performance of classification by round-robin testing and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. To assess the efficacy of 3D analysis, the study is repeated in two-dimensions (2D) using a representative slice through the middle of the lesion. In 2D and in 3D, radial gradient analysis and analysis of margin sharpness were found to be an effective combination to distinguish between benign and malignant masses (resulting area under the ROC curve: 0.96). Feature analysis in 3D was found to result in higher performance of lesion characterization than 2D feature analysis for the majority of single and combined features. In conclusion, automated feature extraction and classification has the potential to complement the interpretation of radiologists in an objective, consistent, and accurate way. (C) 1998 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.