A dosemetric and radiobiological impact of VMAT and 3DCRT on lumbosacral plexuses, an underestimated organ at risk in cervical cancer patients

被引:4
|
作者
Soni, Sweta [1 ,3 ]
Pareek, Puneet [1 ]
Manna, Sumanta [1 ]
Gayen, Sanjib [1 ]
Pundhir, Ashish [2 ]
Tiwari, Ramakant [1 ]
Vyas, Rakesh Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Community Med, Kalyani, W Bengal, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
关键词
lumbosacral plexuses; VMAT; 3DCRT; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; NORMAL TISSUE; PLEXOPATHY; IMRT; TOLERANCE; BOWEL; ARC;
D O I
10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0079
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate dosimetric and radiobiological difference between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in organ at risk (OAR) lumbosacral plexus (LSP) in cervical cancer patients. Materials and methods: 30 patients of cervical cancer who were treated using 3DCRT or VMAT along with chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy were enrolled. LSP was delineated retrospectively. Dosimetric and radiobiological difference was evaluated. Patients were followed for radiation induced lumbosacral plexopathy (RILSP). Results: Median follow-up was 12 months (3-16 months). 53.3% of patients were treated by 3DCRT and 46.7% by VMAT. The mean (+/- SD) LSP volume: 119.03 +/- 15 cm(3). The mean volume percentages (%) of the LSP: V5, V10, V20, V30, V40, V50, V55, and V60 were 100%, 99.8%, 99.2%, 94.3%, 84.03%, 59.7%, 0%, 0%, respectively. All patients received doses to the LSP in excess of 50 Gy, one patient received 55 Gy. A statistically significant difference was observed in the median value of V20, V30, V40, V50, D50, P2, P4, P7, P8, P9, and P10 across two different techniques of radiotherapy - VMAT and 3DCRT. None of the patients presented with RILSP. NTCP value was less in VMAT plans compared to 3DCRT, which is also statistically significant. Conclusion: RILSP is a rare and often refractory complication of pelvic radiotherapy. Advance radiotherapy technique with proper OAR delineation and constraint can prevent the occurrence of RILSP. VMAT has potential benefits for the probability of dose reduction in LSP. Further studies are required focusing on dose distribution in LSP-OAR and radiotherapy modality.
引用
收藏
页码:624 / 633
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Outcome and toxicity of nasopharyngeal cancer patients treated with 3DCRT or VMAT
    Franzese, C.
    Fogliata, A.
    Franceschini, D.
    Clerici, E.
    De Rose, F.
    Cozzi, L.
    Tomatis, S.
    Scorsetti, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S457 - S458
  • [2] Second Cancer Risk in Breast Cancer after Treatment with 3DCRT, IMRT and VMAT
    Abo-Madyan, Y.
    Aziz, M. H.
    Schneider, F.
    Sperk, E.
    Clausen, S.
    Herskind, C.
    Steil, V
    Afzal, M.
    Wenz, F.
    Glatting, G.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2013, 189 : 139 - 139
  • [3] Excess risk of second cancer induction from 3DCRT and VMAT breast radiotherapy
    Fogliata, A.
    De Rose, F.
    Franceschini, D.
    Stravato, A.
    Scorsetti, M.
    Cozzi, L.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 (06) : 605 - 605
  • [4] Hypofractionation with VMAT versus 3DCRT in Post-operative Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Alongi, Filippo
    Cozzi, Luca
    Fogliata, Antonella
    Iftode, Cristina
    Comito, Tiziana
    Clivio, Alessandro
    Villa, Elisa
    Lobefalo, Francesca
    Navarria, Piera
    Reggiori, Giacomo
    Mancosu, Pietro
    Clerici, Elena
    Tomatis, Stefano
    Taverna, Gianluigi
    Graziotti, Pierpaolo
    Scorsetti, Marta
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 33 (10) : 4537 - 4543
  • [5] A Comparison of VMAT, IMRT, and 3DCRT in the Treatment Planning of Patients with Distal Esophageal Cancer
    Patil, S. S.
    May, K. S.
    Hackett, R. A.
    Hales, L. D.
    VanBenthuysen, L. T.
    Malik, N. K.
    Schmitt, J. D.
    Yang, G. Y.
    Warren, G. W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S324 - S325
  • [6] Dosimetric Comparison of 3DCRT, IMRT and VMAT for Spine Radiotherapy based on Secondary Cancer Risk
    Rehman, Jalil ur
    Ashraf, J.
    Isa, Muhammad
    Afzal, Muhammad
    Ibbott, G.
    Chow, James
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2015, 51 : 633 - 636
  • [7] Evaluations of secondary cancer risk in spine radiotherapy using 3DCRT, IMRT, and VMAT: A phantom study
    Rehman, Jalil Ur
    Tailor, Ramesh C.
    Isa, Muhammad
    Afzal, Muhammad
    Chow, James
    Ibbott, Geoffrey S.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2015, 40 (01) : 70 - 75
  • [8] Dosimetric Comparison of Hybrid Plan, 3DCRT and VMAT in Patients with Left-Sided Breast Cancer
    Ahn, S.
    Ju, E.
    Jung, N.
    Kim, Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E753 - E753
  • [9] Second cancer risk after RT for rectal cancer: 3DCRT vs VMAT using different fractionation schemes
    Zwahlen, D.
    Bischoff, L.
    Gruber, G.
    Schneider, U.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S747 - S747
  • [10] Dosimetric Comparison of 3DCRT, IMRT, and Rapid Arc Treatment Techniques in Cervical Cancer: Evaluating Plan Quality and Organ at Risk Sparing
    Patil, Deepali Bhaskar
    Zope, Mukesh Kumar
    Singh, Devraj
    MAPAN-JOURNAL OF METROLOGY SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2025,