Uncertainty about the impact of social decisions increases prosocial behaviour

被引:46
|
作者
Kappes, Andreas [1 ]
Nussberger, Anne-Marie [2 ]
Faber, Nadira S. [2 ,3 ]
Kahane, Guy [3 ]
Savulescu, Julian [3 ]
Crockett, Molly J. [4 ]
机构
[1] City Univ London, Dept Psychol, London, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford Uehiro Ctr Pract Eth, Oxford, England
[4] Yale Univ, Dept Psychol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
来源
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR | 2018年 / 2卷 / 08期
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
MORAL WIGGLE ROOM; DICTATOR GAMES; ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY; ILLUSORY PREFERENCE; MECHANICAL TURK; CLOSE OTHERS; RISK; SELF; COORDINATION; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1038/s41562-018-0372-x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Uncertainty about how our choices will affect others infuses social life. Past research suggests uncertainty has a negative effect on prosocial behaviour(1-12) by enabling people to adopt self-serving narratives about their actions(1,13). We show that uncertainty does not always promote selfishness. We introduce a distinction between two types of uncertainty that have opposite effects on prosocial behaviour. Previous work focused on outcome uncertainty (uncertainty about whether or not a decision will lead to a particular outcome). However, as soon as people's decisions might have negative consequences for others, there is also impact uncertainty (uncertainty about how others' well-being will be impacted by the negative outcome). Consistent with past research(1-12), we found decreased prosocial behaviour under outcome uncertainty. In contrast, prosocial behaviour was increased under impact uncertainty in incentivized economic decisions and hypothetical decisions about infectious disease threats. Perceptions of social norms paralleled the behavioural effects. The effect of impact uncertainty on prosocial behaviour did not depend on the individuation of others or the mere mention of harm, and was stronger when impact uncertainty was made more salient. Our findings offer insights into communicating uncertainty, especially in contexts where prosocial behaviour is paramount, such as responding to infectious disease threats.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 580
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uncertainty about the impact of social decisions increases prosocial behaviour
    Andreas Kappes
    Anne-Marie Nussberger
    Nadira S. Faber
    Guy Kahane
    Julian Savulescu
    Molly J. Crockett
    Nature Human Behaviour, 2018, 2 : 573 - 580
  • [2] The social psychology of prosocial behaviour
    Carlo, Gustavo
    Armenta, Brian
    JOURNAL OF MORAL EDUCATION, 2007, 36 (04) : 537 - 539
  • [3] Investor behaviour in an environment of uncertainty: the impact of persuasion on investor decisions
    Broietti C.
    Rover S.
    do Carmo Azevedo G.M.
    International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2022, 15 (06) : 663 - 680
  • [4] Encouraging Prosocial Decisions: The Role of Fairness Salience and Uncertainty
    Sleesman, Dustin J.
    Conlon, Donald E.
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2017, 30 (02) : 502 - 515
  • [5] Social Observation Increases Functional Segregation between MPFC Subregions Predicting Prosocial Consumer Decisions
    Jung, Daehyun
    Sul, Sunhae
    Lee, Minwoo
    Kim, Hackjin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [6] Social Observation Increases Functional Segregation between MPFC Subregions Predicting Prosocial Consumer Decisions
    Daehyun Jung
    Sunhae Sul
    Minwoo Lee
    Hackjin Kim
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [7] Encouraging children to mentalise about a perceived outgroup increases prosocial behaviour towards outgroup members
    McLoughlin, Niamh
    Over, Harriet
    DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2019, 22 (03)
  • [8] Uncertainty Increases the Reliance on Affect in Decisions
    Faraji-Rad, Ali
    Pham, Michel Tuan
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2017, 44 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [9] Active Decisions and Prosocial Behaviour: a Field Experiment on Blood Donation
    Stutzer, Alois
    Goette, Lorenz
    Zehnder, Michael
    ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2011, 121 (556): : F476 - F493
  • [10] Students' Evaluations about Prosocial and Violent Behaviour and Attitudes
    Koiv, Kristi
    RURAL ENVIRONMENT, EDUCATION, PERSONALITY. (REEP), 2019, (12): : 63 - 69