Validity and cross-cultural differences of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition in typically developing infants

被引:23
|
作者
Hoskens, Jasmine [1 ,2 ]
Klingels, Katrijn [1 ,2 ]
Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leuven, KU Leuven, Fac Kinesiol & Rehabil Sci, Dept Rehabil Sci,Neuromotor Rehabil Res Grp, Herestr 49,Box 1510, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Hasselt Univ, REVAL Rehabil Res Ctr, BIOMED, Agoralaan Debouw D, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
[3] Univ Cape Town, Dept Hlth & Rehabil, Groote Schuur Hosp, Old Main Bldg, Cape Town, South Africa
关键词
Developmental assessment; Motor development; Bayley-III; Validity; Cross-cultural differences; MOTOR SCALE; SLEEP POSITION; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; REFERENCE VALUES; PRETERM INFANTS; CHILD-CARE; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; NORMS; DELAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.07.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: The Dutch translation of Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BayleyIII-NL) is a comprehensive tool assessing cognitive, language and motor development in children up to 42 months. Aims: The first aim of this study was to evaluate concurrent validity of the Bayley-III-NL Gross Motor Scale (GMS) in relation to the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Secondly, divergent validity between the other subscales mutually and the AIMS was investigated. Finally, the importance of population-specific reference values was examined. Methods and procedures: A sample of 122 healthy, typically developing Flemish children (mean age: 9 months 7 days), born full term was assessed with the Bayley-III-NL and the AIMS. Outcomes and results: Concurrent validity of the Bayley-III-NL GMS and the AIMS was moderate to high (0.59-0.98; p < 0.001). In addition, weak correlations (-0.10-0.27) between the non-motor-Bayley-III-NL subscales and the AIMS were found. Finally, significant differences were found between Bayley-III scores based on Flemish and American norms (p < 0.001), except for fine motor skills (p = 0.11). Conclusions and Implications: This study provides support for the concurrent validity of the Bayley-III-NL GMS and divergent validity of the different Bayley-III-NL subscales. Secondly, population-specific reference values should be used to avoid over- and under estimation of infant's development.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 25
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Bayley scales of infant and toddler development, third edition.
    Albers, Craig A.
    Grieve, Adam J.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2007, 25 (02) : 180 - 190
  • [2] Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition - Deutsche Fassung
    Macha, Thorsten
    Petermann, Franz
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHIATRIE PSYCHOLOGIE UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE, 2015, 63 (02): : 139 - 143
  • [3] COMPARISON OF THE VINELAND ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SCALES, SECOND EDITION, AND THE BAYLEY SCALES OF INFANT AND TODDLER DEVELOPMENT, THIRD EDITION
    Scattone, Dorothy
    Raggio, Donald J.
    May, Warren
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2011, 109 (02) : 626 - 634
  • [4] Developmental Characteristics of High-Risk Infants According to the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition
    Park, Ju-Young
    Jung, Nam-Hae
    CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2025, 51 (01)
  • [5] Comparison of the Bayley scales of infant development, second edition and the Bayley scales of infant development with premature infants
    Goldstein, DJ
    Fogle, EE
    Wieber, JL
    OShea, TM
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 13 (04) : 391 - 396
  • [6] Usefulness of the Bayley scales of infant and toddler development, third edition, in the early diagnosis of language disorder
    Torras-Mana, Montserrat
    Guillamon-Valenzuela, Montserrat
    Ramirez-Mallafre, Ariadna
    Brun-Gasca, Carme
    Fornieles-Deu, Albert
    PSICOTHEMA, 2014, 26 (03) : 349 - 356
  • [7] Concurrent validity of the Warner Initial Developmental Evaluation of Adaptive and Functional Skills and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition
    Peyton, Colleen
    Msall, Michael E.
    Wroblewski, Kristen
    Rogers, Elizabeth E.
    Kohn, Michael
    Glass, Hannah C.
    DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2021, 63 (03): : 349 - 354
  • [8] A psychometric study of the Russian-language version of the "Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-third edition": An assessment of reliability and validity
    Pavlova, Polina
    Maksimov, Dmitry
    Chegodaev, Dmitry
    Kiselev, Sergey
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [9] Cross-cultural differences in infant and toddler sleep
    Mindell, Jodi A.
    Sadeh, Avi
    Wiegand, Benjamin
    How, Ti Hwei
    Goh, Daniel Y. T.
    SLEEP MEDICINE, 2010, 11 (03) : 274 - 280
  • [10] The Predictive Value of Language Scales: Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Third Edition in Correlation With Korean Sequenced Language Scale for Infant
    Doh, Joung Hyun
    Kim, Soo A.
    Oh, Kiyoung
    Kim, Yuntae
    Park, Nodam
    Park, Siha
    Heo, Nam Hun
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2020, 44 (05): : 378 - 385