Do neck-proprioceptive and caloric-vestibular stimulation influence covert visual attention in normals, as they influence visual neglect?

被引:45
|
作者
Rorden, C [1 ]
Karnath, HO
Driver, J
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Psychol, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Tubingen, Dept Cognit Neurol, Tubingen, Germany
[3] UCL, Inst Cognit Neurosci, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
human; perception; spatial attention; temporal order judgement;
D O I
10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00126-3
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Neck-proprioceptive and caloric-vestibular stimulation have been shown to ameliorate the spatial bias exhibited by patients suffering from unilateral visual neglect. These interventions might in principle have their effect by biasing covert attention towards the neglected side. Tf so, the same interventions should also modulate covert attention in neurologically-intact subjects. However, we demonstrate here that neither neck-proprioception (vibration of left neck muscles) nor caloric-vestibular stimulation (injection of iced water into the left ear) affect covert visual attention in healthy individuals. These results from normals may distinguish between different accounts for unilateral neglect in patients. In particular, they argue against explanations of neglect solely in terms of a pathological misperception of body orientation within an otherwise normal neural representation of space. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 375
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] The perception of body orientation after neck-proprioceptive stimulation - Effects of time and of visual cueing
    Karnath, HO
    Reich, E
    Rorden, C
    Fetter, M
    Driver, J
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 143 (03) : 350 - 358
  • [2] Convergent and divergent effects of neck proprioceptive and visual motion stimulation on visual space processing in neglect
    Schindler, I
    Kerkhoff, G
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2004, 42 (09) : 1149 - 1155
  • [3] CORIOLIS VESTIBULAR STIMULATION AND INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT VISUAL SURROUNDS
    COLLINS, WE
    AEROSPACE MEDICINE, 1968, 39 (02): : 125 - &
  • [4] The Influence of Visual, Vestibular, and Hindlimb Proprioceptive Ablations on Landing Preparation in Cane Toads
    Cox, S. M.
    Ekstrom, L. J.
    Gillis, G. B.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 58 (05) : 894 - 905
  • [5] Influence of vestibular and visual stimulation on split-belt walking
    Marques, B.
    Colombo, G.
    Mueller, R.
    Duersteler, M. R.
    Dietz, V.
    Straumann, D.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 183 (04) : 457 - 463
  • [6] Influence of vestibular and visual stimulation on split-belt walking
    B. Marques
    G. Colombo
    R. Müller
    M. R. Dürsteler
    V. Dietz
    D. Straumann
    Experimental Brain Research, 2007, 183 : 457 - 463
  • [7] Developmental processes on posture control in children. Influence of proprioceptive, visual and vestibular afferences
    Steindl, R
    Ulmer, H
    Scholtz, AW
    HNO, 2004, 52 (05) : 423 - 430
  • [8] Do supine position and deprivation of visual environment influence spatial neglect?
    Gassama, Sahawanatou
    Deplancke, Antoine
    Saj, Arnaud
    Honore, Jacques
    Rousseaux, Marc
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2011, 258 (07) : 1288 - 1294
  • [9] Do supine position and deprivation of visual environment influence spatial neglect?
    Sahawanatou Gassama
    Antoine Deplancke
    Arnaud Saj
    Jacques Honoré
    Marc Rousseaux
    Journal of Neurology, 2011, 258 : 1288 - 1294
  • [10] Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention
    Mueller, Matthias M.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 77 (03) : 292 - 303