A Call for a Standardized Approach to Reporting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Clinical Relevance Ratio

被引:46
|
作者
Orr, Melissa N. [1 ]
Klika, Alison K. [1 ]
Gagnier, Joel J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bhandari, Mohit [1 ,4 ]
Piuzzi, Nicolas S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME | 2021年 / 103卷 / 22期
关键词
TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; P VALUES; REGISTRIES; CARE;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.21.00030
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
A shift toward a value-driven health-care model has made prospective collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) inextricably tied to measuring the success of orthopaedic surgery and patient satisfaction. While progress has been made in optimizing the utilization of PROM data, including establishing appropriate PROMs for a procedure and determining the clinical importance of unique tools, if these PROMs are not accurately analyzed and reported, a proportion of patients who do not reach the clinical thresholds may go unnoticed. Furthermore, parameters are unclear for setting a statistically and clinically important PROM threshold along with a minimum period for follow-up data collection. In this forum, we walk through simulated data sets modeling PROMs with the example of total joint arthroplasty. We discuss how the commonly used method of reporting PROMs by mean change can overestimate the treatment effects for the cohort as a whole and fail to capture distinct populations that are below a clinically relevant threshold. We demonstrate that when a study's outcome is PROMs, clinical importance should be reported using clinical thresholds such as the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), the smallest change in the treatment outcome that a patient perceives as beneficial, and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), the highest level of symptoms beyond which a patient considers himself or herself well. Finally, we propose a standardized reporting of PROMs that incorporates both the MCID and the PASS, and introduce a "clinical relevance ratio," which relies on a clinically relevant threshold to dichotomize outcomes and reports the number of patients achieving clinical importance at a given time point divided by the total number of patients included in the study. Unlike other common PROM-reporting approaches, the clinical relevance ratio is not skewed by patients who are lost to follow-up with increased time.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Research
    Weinfurt, Kevin P.
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 328 (05): : 472 - 473
  • [2] Patient-reported Outcome Measures - A Call for More Narrative Evidence
    Meadows, Keith
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [3] Development of EMPRO: A tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measures
    Valderas, Jose M.
    Ferrer, Montse
    Mendivil, Joan
    Garin, Olatz
    Rajmil, Luis
    Herdman, Michael
    Alonso, Jordi
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (04) : 700 - 708
  • [4] Patient-reported outcome measures
    Ribeiro, Bernard
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2007, 100 (09) : 397 - 397
  • [5] An alternative approach to implementing patient-reported outcome measures
    Gibbons E.
    Fitzpatrick R.
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 4 (1)
  • [6] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Their Clinical Applications in Dermatology
    Ashley M. Snyder
    Suephy C. Chen
    Mary-Margaret Chren
    Laura K. Ferris
    LaVar D. Edwards
    Robert A. Swerlick
    Nicholas D. Flint
    Amy M. Cizik
    Rachel Hess
    Jacob Kean
    Aaron M. Secrest
    American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, 2023, 24 : 499 - 511
  • [7] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Their Clinical Applications in Dermatology
    Snyder, Ashley M.
    Chen, Suephy C.
    Chren, Mary-Margaret
    Ferris, Laura K.
    Edwards, LaVar D.
    Swerlick, Robert A.
    Flint, Nicholas D.
    Cizik, Amy M.
    Hess, Rachel
    Kean, Jacob
    Secrest, Aaron M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 24 (04) : 499 - 511
  • [8] Heterogeneity of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research
    Terheyden, Jan Henrik
    Gittel, Lisa
    Jungblut, Julie
    Taylor, Deanna J.
    Holz, Frank G.
    Crabb, David P.
    Finger, Robert P.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [9] Reporting recommendations for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures
    Gagnier, Joel
    Mokkink, Wieneke
    Terwee, Caroline
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 : S19 - S19
  • [10] A patient-centred approach to measuring quality in kidney care: patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan L.
    Kyte, Derek
    Cockwell, Paul
    Anderson, Nicola
    Calvert, Melanie
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION, 2017, 26 (06): : 442 - 449