Energy sector in transition - technologies and regulatory policies in flux

被引:29
|
作者
Jorgensen, U [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Mfg Engn & Management, Sect Innovat & Sustainabil, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2004.12.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A transition of the energy sector towards a renewable-based system is one of the challenges that results from the debate on the global climate problems and diminishing fossil fuels. This will demand access to innovations in energy production technologies and usage. However, policies directly focussing on innovation and diffusion of new technologies are losing ground. Policy discussions have been dominated by the liberalisation of energy markets and the introduction of new economic instruments all over Europe. Whether this delegation of responsibility for the transition to new economic instruments provides the expected innovations is questionable. In Europe, Denmark has served as an example country being one of the front runners in the development of energy technologies based on renewable sources, especially wind turbines. But also in Denmark policy preferences have changed from the support for technological innovation and implementation to support for delegating responsibility to a market for green energy and CO2 certificate trading. The different policy regimes marking this change are analysed concerning their ability to support technological innovation. Important elements for the construction and legitimacy of policy regimes comes from academic disciplines involved in policy design. The analysis highlights the basic arguments and the type of knowledge involved and indicates some of the limitations in the measures' ability to solve the problems delegated to them. Experience thus far provides little if any evidence that simple, market-based models can facilitate the need forfuture energy technology innovations in a satisfactory way, which leads to a need for more complex and heterogeneous sets of measures. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 731
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The spatial dimension of energy transition policies, practices and technologies
    Caragliu, Andrea
    Graziano, Marcello
    ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 168
  • [2] Technologies and policies for the transition to a sustainable energy system in china
    Chai, Qimin
    Zhang, Xiliang
    ENERGY, 2010, 35 (10) : 3995 - 4002
  • [3] Future technologies for building sector to accelerate energy transition
    Ascione, Fabrizio
    Nizetic, Sandro
    Wang, Fuqiang
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2025, 326
  • [4] Enhancing Energy Transition through Sector Coupling: A Review of Technologies and Models
    Wang, Qichen
    Hou, Zhengmeng
    Guo, Yilin
    Huang, Liangchao
    Fang, Yanli
    Sun, Wei
    Ge, Yuhan
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (13)
  • [5] Electrical energy storage systems in electricity generation: Energy policies, innovative technologies, and regulatory regimes
    Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L.
    Arabatzis, Garyfallos
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 56 : 1044 - 1067
  • [6] Industrial prosumption-based energy transition technologies investigation for wastewater sector
    Zhao, Chuandang
    Xu, Jiuping
    Wang, Fengjuan
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2025, 211
  • [7] Technologies in transition, policies in transition: Foresight in the risk society
    Webster, Andrew
    Technovation, 1999, 19 (06): : 413 - 421
  • [8] Technologies in transition, policies in transition: foresight in the risk society
    Webster, A
    TECHNOVATION, 1999, 19 (6-7) : 413 - 421
  • [9] Assessment of energy-efficient appliances: A review of the technologies and policies in India's residential sector
    Singh, Vivek Kumar
    Henriques, Carla Oliveira
    Martins, Antonio Gomes
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 8 (03)
  • [10] Elements for the development of public policies in the residential sector of Mexico based in the Energy Reform and the Energy Transition law
    Alberto Rosas-Flores, Jorge
    ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 104 : 253 - 264