Domain Effects and Financial Risk Attitudes

被引:31
作者
Vlaev, Ivo [1 ,6 ]
Kusev, Petko [2 ,3 ]
Stewart, Neil [4 ]
Aldrovandi, Silvio [3 ]
Chater, Nick [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Div Surg, Fac Med, London W2 1NY, England
[2] Kingston Univ, Dept Psychol, Kingston upon Thames KT1 2EE, Surrey, England
[3] City Univ London, Dept Psychol, London EC1V 0HB, England
[4] Univ Warwick, Dept Psychol, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[5] UCL, London WC1H 0AP, England
[6] UCL, ESRC Ctr Econ Learning & Social Evolut, London WC1H OAN, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Financial risk; framing effects; risk attitudes; risk perception; DECISION-MAKING; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; PROSPECT RELATIVITY; PERCEPTION; CHOICE; JUDGMENT; INSURANCE; AVERSION; DEMAND; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01433.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
We investigated whether financial risk preferences are dependent on the financial domain (i.e., the context) in which the risky choice options are presented. Previous studies have demonstrated that risk attitudes change when gambles are framed as gains, losses, or as insurance. Our study explores this directly by offering choices between identical gambles, framed in terms of seven financial domains. Three factors were extracted, explaining 68.6% of the variance: Factor 1 (Positive)-opportunity to win, pension provision, and job salary change; Factor 2 (Positive-Complex)-investments and mortgage buying; Factor 3 (Negative)-possibility of loss and insurance. Inspection of the solution revealed context effects on risk perceptions across the seven scenarios. We also found that the commonly accepted assumption that women are more risk averse cannot be confirmed with the context structure suggested in this research; however, it is acknowledged that in the students' population the variance across genders might be considerably less. These results suggest that our financial risk attitude measures may be tapping into a stable aspect of "context dependence" of relevance to real-world decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:1374 / 1386
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior
[2]   Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans [J].
Benartzi, S ;
Thaler, RH .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (01) :79-98
[3]   How much is investor autonomy worth? [J].
Benartzi, S ;
Thaler, RH .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (04) :1593-1616
[4]   RISK-AVERSION AND CREDIT CONSTRAINTS IN FARMERS DECISION-MAKING - A REINTERPRETATION [J].
BINSWANGER, HP ;
SILLERS, DA .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 1983, 20 (01) :5-21
[5]   More than risk reduction: The investment appeal of insurance [J].
Conner, RA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 17 (01) :39-54
[6]   Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk [J].
Eckel, CC ;
Grossman, PJ .
EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2002, 23 (04) :281-295
[7]   Prudence, risk aversion, and the demand for life insurance [J].
Eisenhauer, JG ;
Halek, M .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1999, 6 (04) :239-242
[8]   Choice preferences without inferences: Subconscious priming of risk attitudes [J].
Erb, HP ;
Bioy, A ;
Hilton, DJ .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2002, 15 (03) :251-262
[9]   VALUE ELICITATION - IS THERE ANYTHING IN THERE [J].
FISCHHOFF, B .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1991, 46 (08) :835-847
[10]   GENDER, RACE, AND PERCEPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL-HEALTH RISKS [J].
FLYNN, J ;
SLOVIC, P ;
MERTZ, CK .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (06) :1101-1108