Detection of anti-dsDNA by ELISA using different sources of antigens

被引:16
|
作者
Janyapoon, K [1 ]
Jivakanont, P
Surbrsing, R
Siriprapapan, W
Tachawuttiwat, T
Korbsrisate, S
机构
[1] Rangsit Univ, Fac Med Technol, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Dept Immunol, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
关键词
anti-dsDNA; bacterial genomic DNA; human genomic DNA; ELISA; SLE;
D O I
10.1080/09638280400025036
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Aim: To compare different sources of DNA for use in ELISA-based assays for anti-dsDNA antibody detection in systemic lupus erythernatosus (SLE) diagnosis. Method: Bacterial genomic DNA from Flavobacterium menignosepticum, Proteus vulgalis, Seratia marcescens, Streptococcus pyogenes and Salmonella typhimurium and genomic DNA from human blood were used as antigens for IgG anti-dsDNA detection by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Eighty-six sera were tested, 28 derived from patients with SLE, 28 from patients with other rheumatic diseases and 30 from normal human subjects. Results: Genomic DNA from Flavobacterium menignosepticum and human blood had high sensitivity (75%, 82%) and specificity (91%, 91%) for anti-dsDNA detection in diagnosis of SLE. However, human genomic DNA was the most effective antigen of all antigens studied. The assay had a higher sensitivity but lower specificity than commercial ELISA (61 % sensitivity and 95% specificity). There was a high level of correlation between commercial ELISA and ELISA using human genomic DNA as antigen (r=0.776, p<0.001) and they exhibited a high level of diagnostic agreement with each other (K=0.890, p<0.001). Conclusion: The genomic DNA from human blood is a potentially useful source of antigen for the detection of anti-dsDNA by ELISA. However, further studies are required to compare the performance of ELISA using this source of antigen against commercial radioimmunoassays for antidsDNA detection.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 68
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A FLUOROGENIC ELISA FOR ANTI-DSDNA ANTIBODIES
    CHIANG, TR
    SCOTT, JR
    FASEB JOURNAL, 1991, 5 (04): : A643 - A643
  • [2] THE SPECIFICITY OF THE ANTI-DSDNA ELISA - A CLOSER LOOK
    BRINKMAN, K
    TERMAAT, R
    VANDENBRINK, H
    BERDEN, J
    SMEENK, R
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 1991, 139 (01) : 91 - 100
  • [3] Anti-dsDNA antibody testing in the clinic: Farr or ELISA?
    Michael Mahler
    Marvin J Fritzler
    Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology, 2007, 3 : 72 - 73
  • [4] Anti-dsDNA antibody testing in the clinic: Farr or ELISA?
    Mahler, Michael
    Fritzler, Marvin J.
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 3 (02): : 72 - 73
  • [6] Three different antigens for a highly specific anti-dsDNA ELISA in the diagnosis of SLE in comparison to the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test.
    Matthias, T
    Wigand, R
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 42 (06) : 117 - 117
  • [7] Comparison of different methods in detection of Anti-DsDNA antibodies and their diagnostic utility
    Dalgic, Tunakan C.
    Gokmen, Mete E. N.
    Sin, A. Z.
    ALLERGY, 2019, 74 : 377 - 377
  • [8] Anti-dsDNA antibody testing by Farr and ELISA techniques is not equivalent
    Neogi, Tuhina
    Gladman, Dafna D.
    Ibanez, Dominique
    Urowitz, Murray
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2006, 33 (09) : 1785 - 1788
  • [9] DETECTION OF ANTI-DSDNA AS DIAGNOSTIC-TOOL
    SWAAK, AJG
    GROENWOLD, J
    AARDEN, LA
    FELTKAMP, TEW
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1981, 40 (01) : 45 - 49
  • [10] DETECTION OF ANTI-DSDNA AS A DIAGNOSTIC-TOOL
    MCHARDY, KC
    RENNIE, JAN
    REID, TMS
    HORNE, CHW
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1985, 44 (08) : 573 - 574