Damage to Residual Stand Caused by Mechanized Selection Harvest in Uneven-Aged Picea abies Dominated Stands

被引:24
|
作者
Modig, Emil [1 ]
Magnusson, Bo [2 ]
Valinger, Erik [3 ]
Cedergren, Jonas
Lundqvist, Lars [3 ]
机构
[1] Statens Fastighetsverk, Jokkmokk, Sweden
[2] Skogsstyrelsen, Bracke, Sweden
[3] SLU, Deparment Forest Ecol & Management, SE-90183 Umea, Sweden
关键词
selection cutting; logging damage; continuous cover management; residual stand; logging methods; NORWAY SPRUCE; FORESTS; GROWTH; SWEDEN;
D O I
10.14214/sf.442
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Permanent field plots were established in two uneven-aged Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst) dominated stands in west-central Sweden. The objective was to quantify level and type of damage caused by harvesting and to quantify the difference between two treatments: T20) only skid road harvest (20 m distance between ca. 4 m wide roads), and T40) skid road harvest (40 m distance between ca. 4 m wide roads) combined with thinning between the roads. In T40, the goal was to harvest approximately the same standing volume as in T20. After harvest, two circular sample plots (radius 18 m, i.e. 1018 m(2)) were established at random locations within each treated area. All mechanical damage on the stem caused by harvest was measured and registered, including bark stripping larger than 15 cm(2), stem broken or split, and tearing of branches causing damage on the stem. About 70-90 per cent of the damaged trees were smaller than 15 cm dbh. Very few trees larger than 25 cm dbh were damaged. In T20, more than 50 per cent of the damaged trees were located less than 5 in from the skid road, compared to less than 25 per cent for T40, in which more than 50 per cent of the damaged trees were located 5-10 m from the skid road. Creating only half the number of skid roads caused no more damage, and was probably more profitable because mean stem volume was about 1.5 times larger than in T20.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 274
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] MODELING THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN UNEVEN-AGED STAND OF PICEA-ABIES
    KOLSTROM, T
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 1993, 8 (03) : 373 - 383
  • [2] Damage to saplings in mechanized selection cutting in uneven-aged Norway spruce stands
    Surakka, Heikki
    Siren, Matti
    Heikkinen, Juha
    Valkonen, Sauli
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2011, 26 (03) : 232 - 244
  • [3] Influence of local stand basal area on density and growth of regeneration in uneven-aged Picea abies stands
    Lundqvist, L
    Fridman, E
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 1996, 11 (04) : 364 - 369
  • [4] Stand development in uneven-aged sub-alpine Picea abies stands after partial harvest estimated from repeated surveys
    Lundqvist, L
    FORESTRY, 2004, 77 (02): : 119 - 129
  • [5] Tree Damage in Mechanized Uneven-aged Selection Cuttings
    Siren, Matti
    Hyvonen, Juha
    Surakka, Heikki
    CROATIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST ENGINEERING, 2015, 36 (01) : 33 - 42
  • [6] Stand development after different thinnings in two uneven-aged Picea abies forests in Sweden
    Lundqvist, Lars
    Chrimes, Dillon
    Elfving, Bjorn
    Morling, Tommy
    Valinger, Erik
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 238 (1-3) : 141 - 146
  • [7] Ingrowth,survival and height growth of small trees in uneven-aged Picea abies stands in southern Finland
    Kalle Eerikinen
    Sauli Valkonen
    Timo Saksa
    ForestEcosystems, 2014, 1 (01) : 31 - 40
  • [8] Stand density index in uneven-aged ponderosa pine stands
    Woodall, CW
    Fiedler, CE
    Milner, KS
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 2003, 33 (01): : 96 - 100
  • [9] Estimation of stand density in uneven-aged natural pine stands
    Kramer, H
    Aguirre, O
    Katsch, C
    Jimenez, J
    ALLGEMEINE FORST UND JAGDZEITUNG, 1997, 168 (11-12): : 197 - 202
  • [10] Contrasting the temporal dynamics of stand structure in even- and uneven-sized Picea abies dominated stands
    Zenner, Eric K.
    Lahde, Erkki
    Laiho, Olavi
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2011, 41 (02) : 289 - 299