共 50 条
Comparison of fourteen rule-out strategies for acute myocardial infarction
被引:51
|作者:
Wildi, Karin
[1
,2
,4
,15
]
Boeddinghaus, Jasper
[1
,2
,4
,16
]
Nestelberger, Thomas
[1
,2
,4
,16
]
Twerenbold, Raphael
[1
,2
,4
,17
]
Badertscher, Patrick
[1
,2
,4
]
Wussler, Desiree
[1
,2
,4
,16
]
Gimenez, Maria Rubini
[1
,2
,4
]
Puelacher, Christian
[1
,2
,4
,16
]
de Lavallaz, Jeanne du Fay
[1
,2
,4
,16
]
Dietsche, Sebastian
[1
,2
,4
]
Walter, Joan
[1
,2
,4
,16
]
Kozhuharov, Nikola
[1
,2
,4
,16
]
Morawiec, Beata
[4
,7
]
Miro, Oscar
[4
,5
]
Javier Martin-Sanchez, F.
[4
,6
]
Subramaniam, Sinthuri
[4
,16
]
Geigy, Nicolas
[18
]
Keller, Dagmar I.
[12
]
Reichlin, Tobias
[1
,2
,4
]
Mueller, Christian
[1
,2
,4
]
Mueller, Deborah
[1
,2
]
Sazgary, Lorraine
[1
,2
]
Marbot, Stella
[1
,2
]
Sabti, Zaid
[3
,4
]
Flores, Dayana
[1
,2
,3
,4
]
Meissner, Kathrin
[1
,2
]
Kulangara, Caroline
[1
,2
]
Freese, Michael
[1
,2
,4
]
Osswald, Stefan
[3
]
Stelzig, Claudia
[1
,2
]
Bingisser, Roland
[3
,4
]
Lopez, Beatriz
[5
]
Martinez Aguero, Maria
[6
]
Nowalany-Kozielska, Ewa
[7
]
Kawecki, Damian
[7
]
Parenica, Jiri
[4
,9
]
Ganovska, Eva
[8
,9
]
Lohrmann, Jens
[1
,2
]
Buser, Andreas
[10
,11
]
Flores, Dayana
[1
,2
,3
,4
]
Grimm, Karin
[1
,2
]
Hartmann, Beate
[1
,2
]
Muzyk, Piotr
[7
]
Rentsch, Katharina
[13
]
von Eckardstein, Arnold
[12
,14
]
机构:
[1] Univ Basel, Univ Basel Hosp, CRIB, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel, Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Basel, Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Basel, Switzerland
[4] GREAT Network, Rome, Italy
[5] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Emergency Dept, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
[6] Hosp Clin San Carlos, Serv Urgencias, Madrid, Spain
[7] Med Univ Katowice, Dept Cardiol 2, Div Dent Zabrze, Katowice, Poland
[8] Univ Hosp Brno, Dept Cardiol, Brno, Czech Republic
[9] Masaryk Univ, Fac Med, Brno, Czech Republic
[10] Swiss Red Cross, Ctr Blood Transfus, Basel, Switzerland
[11] Univ Basel, Dept Hematol, Univ Basel Hosp, Basel, Switzerland
[12] Univ Hosp Zurich, Emergency Dept, Zurich, Switzerland
[13] Univ Hosp Basel, Dept Lab Med, Basel, Switzerland
[14] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Lab Med, Zurich, Switzerland
[15] Prince Charles Hosp, Crit Care Res Grp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[16] Univ Basel, Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Basel, Switzerland
[17] Hamburg Univ, Ctr Heart, Dept Gen & Intervent Cardiol, Hamburg, Germany
[18] Kantonsspital Liestal, Emergency Dept, Liestal, Switzerland
基金:
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词:
Acute myocardial infarction;
Diagnosis;
Rule-out;
High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and I;
Rule-out algorithm;
Efficacy;
SENSITIVITY CARDIAC TROPONIN;
EARLY-DIAGNOSIS;
RAPID RULE;
EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT;
INCREMENTAL VALUE;
2-HOUR ALGORITHM;
VALIDATION;
COPEPTIN;
PROTOCOL;
DISEASE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.11.140
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background: The clinical availability of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) has enabled the development of several innovative strategies for the rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Due to the lack of direct comparisons, selection of the best strategy for clinical practice is challenging. Methods: In a prospective international multicenter diagnostic study enrolling 3696 patients presenting with suspected AMI to the emergency department, we compared the safety and efficacy of 14 different hs-cTn-based strategies: hs-cTn concentrations below the limit of detection (LoD), dual-marker combining hs-cTn with copeptin, ESC 0 h/1 h-algorithm, 0 h/2 h-algorithm, 2 h-ADP-algorithm, NICE-algorithm, and ESC 0 h/3 h-algorithm, each using either hs-cTnT or hs-cTnI. The final diagnosis of AMI was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists using all available clinical information including cardiac imaging and serial hs-cTn concentrations. Results: AMI was the final diagnosis in 16% of patients. Using hs-cTnT, safety quantified by the negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity was very high (99.8-100% and 99.5-100%) and comparable for all strategies, except the dual-marker approach (NPV 98.7%, sensitivity 96.7%). Similarly, using hs-cTnI, safety quantified by the NPV and sensitivity was very high (99.7-100% and 98.9-100%) and comparable for all strategies, except the dual-marker approach (NPV 96.9%, sensitivity 90.4%) and the NICE-algorithm (NPV 99.1%, sensitivity 94.7%). Efficacy, quantified by the percentage of patients eligible for rule-out, differed markedly, and was lowest for LoD-algorithm (15.7-26.8%). Conclusion: All rapid rule-out algorithms, except the dual-marker strategy and the NICE-algorithm using hs-cTnI, favorably combine safety and efficacy, and can be considered for routine clinical practice. Clinical trial registration: NCT00470587, http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00470587. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 47
页数:7
相关论文