Whole-pelvic volumetric-modulated arc therapy for high-risk prostate cancer: treatment planning and acute toxicity

被引:14
|
作者
Ishii, Kentaro [1 ]
Ogino, Ryo [1 ]
Hosokawa, Yukinari [2 ]
Fujioka, Chiaki [1 ]
Okada, Wataru [1 ]
Nakahara, Ryota [1 ]
Kawamorita, Ryu [1 ]
Tada, Takuhito [3 ]
Hayashi, Yoshiki [2 ]
Nakajima, Toshifumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tane Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Nishi Ku, Osaka 5500025, Japan
[2] Tane Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Nishi Ku, Osaka 5500025, Japan
[3] Izumi Municipal Hosp, Dept Radiol, Izumi 5940071, Japan
关键词
prostate cancer; whole-pelvic radiotherapy; volumetric-modulated arc therapy; treatment planning; image-guided radiotherapy; acute toxicity; CONFORMAL RADIATION-THERAPY; PHASE-III TRIAL; LOCALLY ADVANCED-CARCINOMA; IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY; LYMPH-NODE INVOLVEMENT; ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION; DOSE-ESCALATION; DEFINITIVE RADIOTHERAPY; RECTAL TOXICITY; ADJUVANT;
D O I
10.1093/jrr/rru086
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The objectives of this study were to evaluate dosimetric quality and acute toxicity of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and daily image guidance in high-risk prostate cancer patients. A total of 100 consecutive high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with definitive VMAT with prophylactic whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) were enrolled. All patients were treated with a double-arc VMAT plan delivering 52 Gy to the prostate planning target volume (PTV), while simultaneously delivering 46.8 Gy to the pelvic nodal PTV in 26 fractions, followed by a single-arc VMAT plan delivering 26 Gy to the prostate PTV in 13 fractions. Image-guided RT was performed with daily cone-beam computed tomography. Dose-volume parameters for the PTV and the organs at risk (OARs), total number of monitor units (MUs) and treatment time were evaluated. Acute toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. All dosimetric parameters met the present plan acceptance criteria. Mean MU and treatment time were 471 and 146 s for double-arc VMAT, respectively, and were 520 and 76 s for single-arc VMAT, respectively. No Grade 3 or higher acute toxicity was reported. Acute Grade 2 proctitis, diarrhea, and genitourinary toxicity occurred in 12 patients (12%), 6 patients (6%) and 13 patients (13%), respectively. The present study demonstrated that VMAT for WPRT in prostate cancer results in favorable PTV coverage and OAR sparing with short treatment time and an acceptable rate of acute toxicity. These findings support the use of VMAT for delivering WPRT to high-risk prostate cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 150
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Treatment Planning and Acute Toxicity of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) in the Treatment of High-Risk Prostate Cancer With Whole Pelvic Radiation Therapy
    Ishii, K.
    Ogino, R.
    Hosokawa, Y.
    Fujioka, C.
    Nakahara, R.
    Okada, W.
    Kawamorita, R.
    Hayashi, Y.
    Nakajima, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S360 - S360
  • [2] Comparison of dosimetric parameters and acute toxicity after whole-pelvic vs prostate-only volumetric-modulated arc therapy with daily image guidance for prostate cancer
    Ishii, Kentaro
    Ogino, Ryo
    Hosokawa, Yukinari
    Fujioka, Chiaki
    Okada, Wataru
    Nakahara, Ryota
    Kawamorita, Ryu
    Tada, Takuhito
    Hayashi, Yoshiki
    Nakajima, Toshifumi
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 89 (1062):
  • [3] Bowel and urinary quality of life after whole-pelvic versus prostate-only volumetric-modulated arc therapy for localized prostate cancer
    Ishii, Kentaro
    Yamanaga, Toshiko
    Ogino, Ryo
    Hosokawa, Yukinari
    Kishimoto, Shun
    Nakahara, Ryuta
    Shimada, Chiaki
    Kawamorita, Ryu
    Tada, Takuhito
    Hayashi, Yoshiki
    Nakajima, Toshifumi
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8 (02) : E49 - E55
  • [4] Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy
    Buschmann, Martin
    Sharfo, Abdul Wahab M.
    Penninkhof, Joan
    Seppenwoolde, Yvette
    Goldner, Gregor
    Georg, Dietmar
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    Heijmen, Ben J. M.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2018, 194 (04) : 333 - 342
  • [5] Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Standard IMRT: GI and GU Toxicity in the Pelvic Nodal Treatment of High-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Hentschel, B.
    Oehler, W.
    Strauss, D.
    Berger, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S345 - S345
  • [6] A Dosimetric Comparison of Tomotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in the Treatment of High-Risk Prostate Cancer With Pelvic Nodal Radiation Therapy
    Pasquier, David
    Cavillon, Fabrice
    Lacornerie, Thomas
    Touzeau, Claire
    Tresch, Emmanuelle
    Lartigau, Eric
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 85 (02): : 549 - 554
  • [7] Early Toxicity Assessment of Pelvic Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) With Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost to Prostate for High-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Ferrer, F.
    Boladeras, A.
    Pineiro, R.
    De Blas, R.
    Nunez, M.
    Del Carpio, A.
    Bejar, S.
    Zardoya, E.
    Picon, C.
    Gueda, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S388 - S388
  • [8] Multi-criteria optimization for planning volumetric-modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer
    Park, Jongmoo
    Park, Jaehyeon
    Oh, Sean
    Yea, Ji Woon
    Lee, Jeong Eun
    Park, Jae Won
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (09):
  • [9] Volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using multicriteria optimization for localized prostate cancer
    Ghandour, Sarah
    Matzinger, Oscar
    Pachoud, Marc
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (03): : 258 - 269
  • [10] Evaluation of Knowledge-Based Versus Manual Treatment Planning of Whole-Pelvic Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Node-Positive Prostate Cancer
    Fujii, K.
    Mukumoto, N.
    Nakamura, K.
    Nakamura, M.
    Takayama, K.
    Mizowaki, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : E660 - E661