Comparison of Oncotype DX With Modified Magee Equation Recurrence Scores in Low-Grade Invasive Carcinoma of Breast

被引:2
|
作者
Hou, Yanjun [1 ]
Zynger, Debra L. [1 ]
Li, Xiaoxian [2 ]
Li, Zaibo [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Pathol, Wexner Med Ctr, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Lobular; Mucinous; Tubular; Magee equation; Oncotype DX; Recurrence score; GENE-EXPRESSION; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; STATISTICS; PREDICTION; PATHOLOGY; THERAPY; BENEFIT; WOMEN; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1093/AJCP/AQX059
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Objectives: Several specific histologic types of invasive carcinoma of breast, including invasive tubular carcinoma (ITC), invasive mucinous carcinoma (IMC), and classical invasive lobular carcinoma (CILC), are considered low-grade carcinomas with favorable outcomes. We aimed to investigate the utility of Oncotype DX test in these tumors by comparing its recurrence score (RS) with the modified Magee equation RS. Methods: Oncotype DX RSs were collected and modified Magee equation RSs were calculated in 163 low-grade invasive breast carcinomas, including 105 CILCs, 41 ITCs, and 17 IMCs. Results: In total, 105 (64.4%) cases had an Oncotype DX RS less than 18, 56 (34.4%) were between 18 and 30, and two (1.2%) were more than 30. Of the cases, 124 (76.1%) had a modified Magee RS less than 18, 39 (23.9%) were between 18 and 30, and no case was more than 30. The overall agreement between Oncotype DX RS and modified Magee RS risk categories was 68.7%. Two CILCs with an Oncotype DX RS more than 30 had modified Magee equation RSs of 20.3 and 20.0, respectively, and both had not shown recurrent disease. Conclusions: Performing Oncotype DX on low-grade invasive carcinomas is unlikely to provide additional useful information beyond Magee equation RS, and eliminating Oncotype DX from these cases could lead to substantial cost savings.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 172
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Oncotype DX and Magee Recurrence Scores in 60 Infiltrating Breast Carcinomas
    Ozerdem, Ugur
    Tavassoli, Fattaneh
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2017, 30 : 62A - 63A
  • [2] Comparison of Oncotype DX and Magee Recurrence Scores in 60 Infiltrating Breast Carcinomas
    Ozerdem, Ugur
    Tavassoli, Fattaneh
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2017, 97 : 62A - 63A
  • [3] Comparison of Magee and Oncotype DX Recurrence Scores in estrogen receptor positive breast cancers
    Walts, Ann E.
    Mirocha, James M.
    Bose, Shikha
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (06): : 951 - 956
  • [4] Validation of Modified Magee Equation to Predict the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score
    Neely, Cameron
    Yang, Jing
    Bhattarai, Shristi
    Peng, Limin
    Krishnamurti, Uma
    Aneja, Ritu
    Li, Xiaoxian
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2016, 29 : 61A - 62A
  • [5] Oncotype DX Testing Does Not Benefit Patients with Low-Grade Breast Invasive Carcinoma
    Hou, Yanjun
    Zynger, Debra L.
    Li, Zaibo
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2017, 97 : 47A - 47A
  • [6] Validation of Modified Magee Equation to Predict the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score
    Neely, Cameron
    Yang, Jing
    Bhattarai, Shristi
    Peng, Limin
    Krishnamurti, Uma
    Aneja, Ritu
    Li, Xiaoxian
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2016, 96 : 61A - 62A
  • [7] Oncotype DX Testing Does Not Benefit Patients with Low-Grade Breast Invasive Carcinoma
    Hou, Yanjun
    Zynger, Debra L.
    Li, Zaibo
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2017, 30 : 47A - 47A
  • [8] Clinicopathologic Analysis of Low Grade Invasive Breast Carcinomas (BC) with intermediate and High Oncotype DX Recurrence Scores
    Acs, G.
    Esposito, N. N.
    Laronga, C.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2011, 91 : 25A - 25A
  • [9] Clinicopathologic Analysis of Low Grade Invasive Breast Carcinomas (BC) with intermediate and High Oncotype DX Recurrence Scores
    Acs, G.
    Esposito, N. N.
    Laronga, C.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2011, 24 : 25A - 25A
  • [10] Is Oncotype DX Testing Necessary For Patients With Node Negative, Low-Grade Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma?
    Ali, M.
    Mandich, D.
    Assaad, M.
    Cartun, R. W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2021, 156 : S26 - S26