Assessment of reversible dyssynergic segments after acute myocardial infarction: Dobutamine echocardiography versus thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography

被引:26
|
作者
LeFeuvre, C
Baubion, N
Aubry, N
Metzger, JP
deVernejoul, P
Vacheron, A
机构
[1] Clinique Cardiologique, Ho̧pital Necker, Paris
[2] Clin. Cardiologique Hop. Necker, 75015 Paris
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-8703(96)90269-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Only a moderate degree of concordance has been reported between stress-redistribution-reinjection thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and dobutamine echocardiography for the identification of myocardial viability after acute myocardial infarction. SPECT with rest-reinjection performed 4 hours after exercise testing and digitized two-dimensional (2-D) ultrasound reconstruction of the left ventricle at baseline and after low-dose dobutamine (5 to 10 mu g/kg/min) infusion were compared in 50 patients greater than or equal to 8 days (12 +/- 7 days) after acute myocardial infarction, Five patients were excluded because of technically inadequate echocardiograms, Both SPECT and dobutamine echocardiography were assessed in a 16-segment model and interpreted in the remaining 45 patients. Digitized 2-D reconstruction of the left ventricle in each wall motion was scored from 1 (normal) to 4 (dyskinesia). Myocardial viability was identified on ultrasound wall-motion improvement of one or more grades from baseline to echocardiography performed greater than or equal to 30 days (60 +/- 41 days) after systematic revascularization procedure of the infarct-related artery. Reversible defect under thallium-201 SPECT and wall-motion improvement under dobutamine echocardiography were concordant in 163 (69%) of the 235 baseline dyssynergic segments and in 30 (67%) patients. Myocardial viability was identified after angioplasty (n = 37) or surgery (n = 8) in 29 patients and 109 segments Positive and negative predictive values per patient in the diagnosis of myocardial viability were 86% and 57%, respectively, for stress thallium-201 SPECT with reinjection, and 100% and 62% for dobutamine echocardiography. Positive;and negative predictive values per segment were 80% and 69% for the isotopic method and 91% and 70% for dobutamine echocardiography. We conclude that dobutamine echocardiography and stress thallium-201 SPECT with reinjection have similar accuracies to identify myocardial viability after acute myocardial infarction, with excellent positive but relatively low negative predictive values.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 675
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Low dose dobutamine echocardiography is more predictive of reversible dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction than resting single photon emission computed tomographic thallium-201 scintigraphy
    Smart, S
    Stoiber, T
    Hellman, R
    Duchak, J
    Wynsen, J
    Kitapci, M
    Isitman, A
    Krasnow, A
    Collier, BD
    Sagar, K
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1997, 134 (05) : 822 - 834
  • [2] Dobutamine stress thallium-201 single-photon emission tomography versus echocardiography for evaluation of the extent and location of coronary artery disease late after myocardial infarction
    Elhendy, A
    Bax, JJ
    van Domburg, RT
    Valkema, R
    Cornel, JH
    Reijs, AEM
    Krenning, EP
    Roelandt, JRTC
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1999, 26 (05) : 467 - 473
  • [3] Dobutamine stress thallium-201 single-photon emission tomography versus echocardiography for evaluation of the extent and location of coronary artery disease late after myocardial infarction
    Abdou Elhendy
    Jeroen J. Bax
    Ron T. van Domburg
    Roelf Valkema
    Jan H. Cornel
    Ambroos E. M. Reijs
    Eric P. Krenning
    Jos R. T. C. Roelandt
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 1999, 26 : 467 - 473
  • [4] Comparative study of dobutamine stress echocardiography and dual single-photon emission computed tomography (Thallium-201 and I-123BMIPP) for assessing myocardial viability after acute myocardial infarction
    Yasugi, N
    Koyanagi, S
    Ohzono, K
    Sakai, K
    Matsumoto, T
    Sako, S
    Homma, T
    Azakami, S
    Hiroki, T
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2002, 66 (12) : 1132 - 1138
  • [5] Identification of functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction: Comparison among myocardial contrast echocardiography, dobutamine echocardiography, and thallium-201 tomography
    Catapano, O
    Galvani, M
    Sorbello, F
    Florentini, G
    Roval, D
    Ferrini, D
    CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (17) : 428 - 428
  • [6] Comparative value of dobutamine stress thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography and echocardiography in the diagnosis of cardiac allograft arteriopathy
    Lakkis, NM
    Nagueh, SF
    He, ZX
    Mahmarian, JJ
    Verani, MS
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 29 (02) : 99150 - 99150
  • [7] Diagnostic and prognostic value of dobutamine thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography after heart transplantation
    Wu, YW
    Yen, RF
    Lee, CM
    Ho, YL
    Chou, NK
    Wang, SS
    Huang, PJ
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 24 (05): : 544 - 550
  • [8] Thallium-201 scintigraphy and dobutamine echocardiography in the assessment of myocardial viability
    Peral, V
    Vilacosta, I
    de la Peña, A
    San Román, JA
    Fernández, C
    Hernández, M
    Batlle, E
    Carreras, JL
    Bethencourt, A
    REVISTA CLINICA ESPANOLA, 2001, 201 (01): : 5 - 15
  • [9] Comparison of simultaneous dobutamine echocardiography and thallium-201 stress-reinjection single-photon emission computed tomography in predicting improvement of chronic myocardial dysfunction after revascularization
    Lin, LC
    Ho, YL
    Wu, CC
    Chen, MF
    Liau, CS
    Su, CT
    Huang, PJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 86 (03): : 293 - 298
  • [10] Comparison of prognostic value of negative dobutamine stress echocardiography versus single-photon emission computed tomography after acute myocardial infarction
    Acampa, W
    Spinelli, L
    Petretta, M
    Salvatore, M
    Cuocolo, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 96 (01): : 13 - 16