Influence of image-capturing parameters on digital X-ray radiogrammetry

被引:33
|
作者
Böttcher, J
Pfeil, A
Rosholm, A
Malich, A
Petrovitch, A
Heinrich, B
Lehmann, G
Mentzel, HJ
Hein, G
Linss, E
Kaiser, WA
机构
[1] Univ Jena, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-07747 Jena, Germany
[2] Pronosco AS, DK-2950 Vedbaek, Denmark
[3] Univ Jena, Dept Rheumatol & Osteol, Clin Internal Med, D-07747 Jena, Germany
[4] Univ Jena, Inst Anat 1, D-07740 Jena, Germany
关键词
digital X-ray radiogrammetry; bone mineral density (BMD); Metacarpal Index; tube voltage; X-ray equipment;
D O I
10.1385/JCD:8:1:087
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the importance of different image-capturing conditions, which might influence the characteristics of radiographs and, consequently, impact calculations of bone mineral density (BMD) and Metacarpal Index (MCI) using digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR). Radiographs of the left hand of deceased males were acquired three times using systematically varied parameters: 4-8 miliamp seconds (mA); 40-52 kV; film-focus distance (FFD); 90-130 cm; film sensitivity, 200/400; and different image modalities (conventional vs original digital radiographs as well as digital printouts). Furthermore, the interradiograph reproducibility using both conventional equipment and printouts vs originals of digital images and the intraradiograph reproducibility (either conventional or digital printouts) were evaluated. All BMD and MCI measurements were obtained with the DXR technology. The interradiograph reproducibility of DXR-BMD using conventional images under standardized conditions (6 mAs; 42 kV; I m FFD; film sensitivity of 200) was calculated to be coefficient of variation (CV) = 0.49% for Agfa Curix film and CV = 0.33% for Kodak T-MAT-Plus film, whereas reproducibility error using digital images ranged from CV = 0.57% (digital printouts; Philips) to CV = 1.50% (original digital images; Siemens). The intraradiograph reproducibility error was observed to be CV = 0.13% (conventional; Kodak film) vs CV = 0.27% (digital printouts; Philips). The BMD calculation was not noticeably affected by changes of FFD, exposure level, or film sensitivity/film brand, but was influenced by tube voltage (CV = 0.99% for Kodak film to CV = 2.05% for Siemens digital printouts). No significant differences were observed between the BMD and MCI data. DXR provides measurements of MCI and BMD with high precision and reproducibility. The measurements are unaffected by all tested image-capturing conditions, with the exception of tube voltage. In addition, different digital image devices clearly have an effect on DXR reproducibility.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 94
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Experimental study to detect the influence of image capturing parameteras on digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR)
    Pfeil, A.
    Boettcher, J.
    Schaefer, M. L.
    Petrovitch, A.
    Lehmann, G.
    Heinrich, B.
    Linss, W.
    Malich, A.
    Wolf, G.
    Hein, G.
    Kaiser, W. A.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 17 : S35 - S36
  • [3] The impact of image capturing parameters on cortical bone mineral density measured by digital x-ray radiogrammetry (DXR)
    Boettcher, J.
    Pfeil, A.
    Petrovitch, A.
    Lehmann, G.
    Schaefer, M. L.
    Heinrich, B.
    Linss, W.
    Malich, A.
    Kaiser, W. A.
    Hein, G.
    Wolf, G.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 17 : S290 - S290
  • [4] Correction factors for digital x-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) parameters in case of varied tube voltage during image capturing
    Boettcher, J.
    Pfeil, A.
    Petrovitch, A.
    Schaefer, M. L.
    Lehmann, G.
    Eidner, T.
    Mentzel, H. J.
    Linss, W.
    Malich, A.
    Kaiser, W. A.
    Hein, G.
    Wolf, G.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 17 : S292 - S292
  • [5] Digital x-ray radiogrammetry
    Rosholm, A
    Arnbjerg, D
    Paulsen, R
    Thodberg, HH
    Jorgensen, JT
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 11 : 38 - 39
  • [6] Precision of digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR)
    不详
    CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 78 : S153 - S153
  • [7] Influence of Tomographic Parameters on the Image Quality of Digital X-ray Tomosynthesis
    Oh, J. E.
    Cho, H. S.
    Choi, S. I.
    Kim, K. Y.
    Lee, S. Y.
    Lee, B. S.
    Kim, S.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, : 451 - 454
  • [8] Digital X-ray radiogrammetry on hand X-rays
    Baadegaard, N
    Linde, R
    Wendt, O
    Rosholm, A
    BONE, 2001, 28 (05) : S176 - S176
  • [9] Fracture discrimination by digital X-ray radiogrammetry.
    Hyldstrup, L
    Timm, W
    Glueer, C
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2000, 15 : S399 - S399
  • [10] The application of digital X-ray radiogrammetry to the diagnosis of osteoporosis
    Ward, KA
    Cotton, JE
    Adams, JE
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2001, 16 (06) : 1187 - 1187