A Multi-Indicator Evaluation Method for Spatial Distribution of Urban Emergency Shelters

被引:10
|
作者
Wang, Xinxiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guan, Minglei [1 ,4 ]
Dong, Chunlai [3 ]
Wang, Jingzhe [1 ,4 ]
Fan, Yong [1 ,4 ]
Xin, Fei [3 ]
Lian, Guoyun [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Polytech, Inst Appl Artificial Intelligence Guangdong Hong, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Salvage Bur, Guangzhou 510260, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Ocean Univ, Sch Marine Technol & Geomat, Lianyungang 222005, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Lab Artificial Intelligence & Digital E, Shenzhen 518107, Peoples R China
关键词
emergency shelter; spatial distribution; multi-indicator evaluation; Shanghai; SELECTION;
D O I
10.3390/rs14184649
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Evaluation of the spatial distribution of urban emergency shelters can effectively identify defects in the current distribution of urban emergency shelters and weaknesses in the overall evacuation service capacity of the city and provide reference for improving the level of urban emergency shelters and evacuation and disaster relief capacity. At present, evaluation of the spatial distribution of urban emergency shelters is mainly carried out on three aspects: effectiveness, accessibility, and safety. However, there are problems, such as individual evaluation scales and incomplete indicator systems, unreasonable allocation of indicator weights, and ignoring the influence of fuzzy incompatibility between different indicator attributes on the evaluation results. In this paper, we start from two scales, the individual emergency shelter and the regional groups of emergency shelters. Based on the five criteria of effectiveness, accessibility, safety, suitability, and fairness, the evaluation indicator system of the spatial distribution of urban emergency shelters was constructed. It was combined with AHP, CRITIC, the optimal weight coefficient solution method based on the maximum deviation sum of squares theory, and fuzzy optimization theory to construct a multi-indicator evaluation model. Further, the spatial distribution condition of the existing emergency shelter in Shanghai was evaluated. The results show that: among the existing ninety-one emergency shelters in Shanghai, there are nine places with unreasonable spatial distribution; nineteen places are comparatively unreasonable. From the scale of regional groups, there is one district (Pudong New District) with unreasonable spatial distribution: its relative superiority value is far lower than other districts, and there are three districts that are comparatively unreasonable. Further, the evaluation scores of the spatial distribution reasonableness of emergency shelters in each region of Shanghai show a high-low-middle distribution from the downtown area of Shanghai outward. The evaluation indicator system and evaluation method used in this paper can effectively reflect the deficiencies in the spatial distribution of urban emergency shelters, thus providing a reference for the relevant departments to improve and plan emergency shelters.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spatial Distribution Study on Emergency Shelters in Beijing Urban Area
    Zhou Aihua
    Li Chen
    Chen Jing
    Meng Bin
    PROGRESS IN SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL. VIII, PTS A AND B, 2010, 8 : 539 - 544
  • [2] Multi-indicator evaluation method of important members of truss string structures
    Liu, Wenhao
    Zeng, Bin
    Zhou, Zhen
    Zheng, Yifan
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2024, 33 (04):
  • [3] Multi-indicator comprehensive evaluation: reflection on methodology
    Qiu, Dong
    Liu, Tingyi
    DATA SCIENCE IN FINANCE AND ECONOMICS, 2021, 1 (04): : 298 - 312
  • [4] Integrating multi-agent evacuation simulation and multi-criteria evaluation for spatial allocation of urban emergency shelters
    Yu, Jia
    Zhang, Chuanrong
    Wen, Jiahong
    Li, Weidong
    Liu, Rui
    Xu, Hui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2018, 32 (09) : 1884 - 1910
  • [5] Combining optimization of multi-indicator comprehensive evaluation
    Liu, YC
    Gao, LQ
    Zhang, JF
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, : 635 - 639
  • [6] Multi-indicator Active Queue Management Method
    Abualhaj, Mosleh M.
    Hussein, Abdelrahman H.
    Kharma, Qasem M.
    Shambour, Qusai Y.
    COMPUTER SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 38 (02): : 251 - 263
  • [7] Ranking and Prioritization of Emergency Departments Based on Multi-indicator Systems
    Enrico di Bella
    Luca Gandullia
    Lucia Leporatti
    Marcello Montefiori
    Patrizia Orcamo
    Social Indicators Research, 2018, 136 : 1089 - 1107
  • [8] Ranking and Prioritization of Emergency Departments Based on Multi-indicator Systems
    di Bella, Enrico
    Gandullia, Luca
    Leporatti, Lucia
    Montefiori, Marcello
    Orcamo, Patrizia
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2018, 136 (03) : 1089 - 1107
  • [9] An improved indicator standardization method for multi-indicator composite evaluation: A case study in the evaluation of ecological civilization construction in China
    Zhang, Linbo
    Liang, Tian
    Wei, Xiaoxuan
    Wang, Hao
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2024, 108
  • [10] Multi-criteria Satisfaction Assessment of the Spatial Distribution of Urban Emergency Shelters Based on High-Precision Population Estimation
    Yu, Jia
    Wen, Jiahong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE, 2016, 7 (04) : 413 - 429